The Great Phi Theory.

Because there was nothing humble about it?

DocCathode, it is obvious to me that you are too absorbed in the physical world. You must learn to reach out through Spirit, perhaps in the wild parts of the Umbra will you find truth and contentment.

The Umbra certainly lead me to truth and contentment…and they make great soccer equipment too.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by DocCathode *
**

Reality deviant…

You are using Universal Jell-O[sym]Ò[/sym], right? Maybe you just need to add some Quantum Foam[sym]Ò[/sym]. WARNING! Don’t freeze Jell-O 1,2,3[sym]Ò[/sym] or you’ll get Ice 9! Ice 9 is very dangerous. Always boil Ice 9 before you dispose of it!

Hey Hiryuu, pass me that spliff, man…

hmmm… already self contradicted. everything is waves, but… a jello made out of particle/waves.

If the ONLY self organizing shape is the donut (see 2), I guess there is no such thing as a self organizing spiral. I guess that rules out the Hebrew alphabet too, damn.

I’ve got to ask this… Do you know what a fractal is? What does fractal have to do with attraction other than you put the two words near each other in your sentence?

Does this suggest that every wave construction is sentient?

I will stop here, I assume that the lower points rest on the upper points being true? Lets clear these up first.

Wait, wait… I’ve got it… Back to the Hebrew letters for a minute. All you have to do to COMPLETELY convert me to your wacky ideas is this: Describe some/any experiment that I can perform where I will actually SEE the Hebrew alphabet.

Can I too post a site full of drooling nonsense and meaningless manufractured buzzwords and have people like Hiyruu proselytize for me?
'Cos I have some great ideas about clams . . .

Aw, man…you should check out this site. It will all come together for you: Golden Mean Spirals, Seven Color Toroidal Maps, and yes…even the Hebrew Alphabet. Don’t know if he’s on to something or not, but the website’s a trip. Heavy on the graphics, though. Enjoy.

I’m still waiting for Hiyruu to explain how one is supposed to examine/prove his theory. I wasn’t being rhetorical when I asked. I really want to know exactly how he intends to gather evidence for his notions.

I have a hunch you’ll have to wait quite a while for that. I’m still waiting for him to explain what the n stood for in his Grand Equation: G = C [sym]F[/sym][sup]n[/sup]. Haven’t gotten an answer out of him for that one either.

The ‘n’ refers to an nth power.

Damn, we can read math! What PARAMETER dictates what n should be? If n isn’t tied to something, there will always be a solution. If each and every VARIABLE in a formula isn’t tied to a PHYSICAL concept, it is NOT a physic formula, it is just a math excercise.

So, what do n refer to?

that should read:

“NOT a physics formula”

and,

“what does n refer”

You still haven’t answered the key questions, Hryuu.

What measurable real-world effects does your Phi theory predict?

What experiment can we perform to distinguish between your physics theory and conventional ones?

Unless you can answer those, you don’t have a physics theory. You have theology.

Well, I’d like to know what G and C stand for, for that matter. Last I knew, they were “gravity” and “light.” What units, man?

A colleague of mine found this in a PhD dissertation:

Perhaps not quite in Hiryuu’s league, but IMHO a worthy contender.

‘n’ is variable, it can have any value, this is because of the nature of the Phi power series.

Gravity=Light*Phi Power^n

Here is an explanation of the equation G=C*PHI^n

http://www.soulinvitation.com/MCSQUARED/mcsquared.html

Gravity is Recursive Light

Here is the quote of interest from the above referenced article.

from that webpage:

So they DO apparently make some hypotheses/predictions… Except that the ones that don’t sound like complete crap (the role of emotion in stabilizing gravity… nice one) would presumably be under way, and that doesn’t seem to be the case. I haven’t heard too much about magnetic monopoles lately anyway.