The handy depreciation society

Exagerration. Mocking. Satire. Tongue in cheek. Take yer pick of terms to explain that comment.

Please note, too, that I made that comment on the top of the second page of this thread. Not in the thread that started this, not at the start of the thread, in my OP, but in the second page. handy had almost 55 posts pertaining to his insipid, uncalled for, and still-warranting-of-a-valid-explanation comment about the housing situation of Galludet before I made that comment. So, I’d have to be a mind reader to know that handy wouldn’t deign us worthy of his presence when I started this thread because:
[list=1][li]I searched and saw that he never had been called out in the Pit before.[/li][li]I searched and saw that he has posted in the Pit as recently as last month.[/li][li]I didn’t realise that starting a thread flaming someone was considered “baiting” until it gets to be two pages long and they still haven’t bothered to show up.[/list=1]This thread exists because I, and several others, had issues to air about handy. I was hoping he’d be a man about it and reply to them. He hasn’t. Ahh well, I don’t mean to bait him.[/li]
This thread’s been hijacked a few times. I suppose I could ask a mod to close it. Maybe I will tomorrow. Somehow, I still hope handy will show up here and explain himself.

Is that too much to ask?

Now this part.

Essentially, in this internet world, we’re ALL deaf.

We try to make amends for the lack of facial expressions with smilies and the lack of inflection with bolding and italics. I just want handy to TRY!

If handy signed with as little cohesion as he displays here, I’m sure a lot of deaf people would be offended by him too.

The spoken word doesn’t translate well to internet conversations and I’m sure ASL doesn’t either. We try not to offend, why can’t he?

[housewife mode

BTW, dropzone when I had a porcelan (sp?) sink, I always mixed some liquid dishwasher detergent with water and let it sit in the sink for awhile.

It seemed to work better than straight bleach (tho’they usually DO have bleach in them) because it has all those grease cutters too.

[/housewife mode]

Fair enough, Monty. If this thread was about me, I’d address everyone with a legit point to make, and flame the ass off everyone who was acting like a jackass. But it ain’t about me, my opinion has been voiced, so with that, I’ll take my leave of this thread… unless some real jackassery starts up.

well I don’t know what all this is about. isn’t it always like this when someone asks something like this and nobody really knows what any of the replies are about and the joke was bad and ok that was my bad but many times my friends have said that although that virus is bad it’s not the worst thing that could happoen and the pit is not a place where i like to go very often or something like that so even if you have a problem that needs to be solved why don’t you remember that it’s quantity and not quality that counts and i think that that is true or at least what i’ve read means something like that. allegedley.

Well Sue, some people Just Don’t Get It. I think you did exactly the right and proper thing in the way you handled him - not too harsh, not too light. Someone who “rubbed his erection” against me would likely be punched in the face or cut - regardless of their relation to me or any other mitigating circumstances. I admire you for being able to show more composure than I would.

Sue, we have two ‘bones’ of contention:

On handy himself, I felt someone needed to say something about where and why handy was probably coming from apropos his posting style. As I’d never seen anything on the Board before and as this thread seemed a little short of counter-argument, it appeared to me the points about short notes needed to be made. I’m no expert and there may be other reasons that influence the posting style of the deaf – what I identified just seemed to be the most obvious influences on his style to me and at this time.

Yeah, I agree that there seems to be, on the face of it, no reason why he can’t make more effort with capitalisation, bolding and icons. Maybe someone should post a GQ on the subject of how deafness does or doesn’t influence posting styles.

As for content, handy is the first and only deaf person I have seen communicating over a period. I just don’t know how deaf people pick up and incorporate the subtleties of the hearing world although, one imagines, he’s seen enough posts on this board to get a general idea of message board conventions and accepted practice. Again, a genuine GQ might enlighten us all.

I do think – and I say again, I don’t know any deaf people – that the sense of humour among deaf people might well be a little ‘offbeat’ by the standards of the hearing world because of the absence of tone and timing. This is the core subject of the OP and, as I recall, my earlier posting and this paragraph are the only observation that address that point in the thread. Perhaps another GQ.

On the second bone:

There seems little point in exploring this (to me) for a couple of reasons. The first is that we have a different view that probably won’t alter through this debate. This is mine re-iterated:

FWIW, I think this guy has a lifetime of extreme emotional frustration locked away in his head and if he sometimes needs to be reminded of the appropriateness of his actions in the context of a world he doesn’t wholly understand, so be it. For all I know he might not have worked out the difference between sex and showing real affection for someone he clearly cares about i.e. you. But it isn’t necessary to humiliate.
The second reason is that I don’t know all the facts and some of those I do know confuse me. For example, you said:

“I stopped him with an outstreached palm and announced to the entire family, “Don’t hug me. I don’t want hugs from you. Don’t follow me around and don’t touch your penis in front of me, EVER AGAIN!!!””

Followed by in a subsequent post:

*”Did you miss the part when I said he is SEVERLY RETARDED? This man communicates with 5 words, and I’m not exaggerating (sp?). “ *

I misconstrued to whom you were directing the comment. I assumed it was the son as you spoke to him directly but as he couldn’t understand, I now see it was for the benefit of the family.

I wasn’t there, I imagine you found it a very difficult situation but I also think there were better ways of dealing with it other than alienating the mother and shouting at someone who can’t understand.

What is this, the fucking OK Corral? Wyatt Earp has called out one of the Clantons and, because he hasn’t shown, he’s a PUSSY?!?!? You are such a CHILD, Montfort! Why don’t you find some other children to play with and leave the SDMB to us grownups, okay?

No, this is the BBQ Pit. It’s for airing of gripes and complaints, and yes, even flames. I flamed handy. Several others have, too. He hasn’t bothered to reply. I feel it’s within my rights to make commentary on him for that.

Am I a CHILD for doing that? I sure don’t think so.

I like handy. He is funny.

Uh, yeah, it’s pretty childish. Adults don’t jump to conclusions like “he hasn’t responded so he’s guilty” unless they are drunk. Hmmmm, let’s look at what handy has done wrong. He:

  1. Has told a sick joke. Perhaps minor flame material, but really not worth the trouble, considering the general level of taste around here.

  2. Is not our most coherent poster. So fucking what?

  3. Flirted with your girlfriend. I think this is the one that REALLY has you pissed off. AND his actions are fully in keeping with the standards here. Your belligerent reaction is what’s out of place.

handy has chosen not to respond to your baiting. By doing so he has demonstrated a higher level of maturity than you OR me. We should emulate him.

Just an observation. Just because someone can’t speak more than a few words, doesn’t mean that they can’t understand more than that. The fact that he stopped doing it shows that he did understand and that he is clearly capable of learning that certain behavior is inapropriate. The mother and/or the institution should have taught him that that sort of behavior is inapropriate a long time ago. If any anyone is to blame, it is mother for not intervening, and puting Sue in the position of having to deal with the situation. It would have been less embarrassing for him if his mother had taken care of this.

Actually, if you’ve read this thread, you’d see that I have no problems with his “interest in Anniz.” Lots and lots of people have flirted with her, my good friend Olentzero chief among them. I have no problems with that, or them for doing so. I tease Olentzero about it, but he knows I’m just kidding (right?).

I gave that example as a reason why I could have a personal issue with handy, but I don’t. I don’t know the guy from Adam (Anniz had to remind me that his picture is on the Picture Pages). I have a problem with his horrible “joke” and posting style. I believe that I’ve made that very clear about that.

I’m not pissed at handy. Actually, I’m not pissed at anyone right now. I just wish he’d explain himself.

I forgot to ask - are we “deprecating” handy or is his value “depreciating” over time? This is so confusing to me.

The former.

Possibly both.

Oh, and dropzone soon as I figure out an appropriately pit-worthy way to tell you just where, exactly, you can stick your daisies, you ain’t getting 'em. Got that? Bitch?

:wink:

Until I figure out a way. Fuck, I hate me sometimes.

Well, through an amazing bit of coincidence, I came across a post of his today, 'course it was in a thread over a year old (I was doing some searching on…Satans ex to see what all the fuss was, I think it was one of the Anal threads). Anyhow, it didn’t strike me as a bad post. He’s 1 for 1 with me now on to the oter 8,800 and I’ll get back to you.

Oh, and have a nice and go fuck yourself, KK, I know how the damn search thingie works, my point was “where to start” in the mass of posts. Jackass.

[sub]This is still a Pit thread, right?[/sub]

Gee, you want to talk sometime about these feelings of self-loathing? It can’t be healthy and it is reflected in the low quality of your flames.

[sub]Please, nobody point out to him that he’s bursting a blood vessel over an original comment I said in jest, thinking its very preposterousness meant I didn’t need a winkie. I guess I was wrong and that I somehow managed to be too subtle for somebody. And continuing to taunt him is getting to be fun, in a childish way.[/sub]

I saw the post you thrice-cursed son of a motherless goat. I just figured this was as good a thread to practice my flaming in as many. You may now resume your squirrel squicking.

I mean I saw the winkie. Fuck. God, I hate you. :rolleyes: