The Insurgents are spinning the war with the help of our media!

Finally.

Someone who’s intimately familiar with the operations in Iraq has put forth a viewpoint that (of course) differs from what we hear everyday from our media and those on these boards. Doom and gloom, “We’re loosing the war”, “The US if fouling everything up over there”, it would seem from reports that we can’t do anything right, that we’re loosing the war, that we’re suffering from record casualties, and that the entirety of Iraq is out of control, out of our grasp.

I would like to thank LTC Tim Ryan for his depart from the norm in reporting what HE sees over in Iraq, and for the courage to buck the media in an effort bring us something closer to the truth.

Please read the provided link (Finally) at the top of this post, digest what Tim has to say, and then feel free to comment. Maybe even provide a cite of someone in his position that may have an alternate view.

He leads with this;
*"All right, I’ve had enough. I am tired of reading distorted and grossly exaggerated stories from major news organizations about the “failures” in the war in Iraq. “The most trusted name in news” and a long list of others continue to misrepresent the scale of events in Iraq. Print and video journalists are covering only a fraction of the events in Iraq and, more often than not, the events they cover are only negative.

The inaccurate picture they paint has distorted the world view of the daily realities in Iraq. The result is a further erosion of international support for the United States’ efforts there, and a strengthening of the insurgents’ resolve and recruiting efforts while weakening our own. Through their incomplete, uninformed and unbalanced reporting, many members of the media covering the war in Iraq are aiding and abetting the enemy.

The fact is the Coalition is making steady progress in Iraq, but not without ups and downs. So why is it that no matter what events unfold, good or bad, the media highlights mostly the negative aspects of the event? The journalistic adage, “If it bleeds, it leads,” still applies in Iraq, but why only when it’s American blood? "*

For me, it is a breath of fresh air. By reading the news and browsing threads on these boards you would think the end of the world is right around the corner. Many of the posters here think that coming to the aid of Iraq was the biggest mistake the US has ever made.

LTC Ryan point out that the terrorists use our media’s disposition to report the way they do to their (the terrorists) advantage. (I would like to use the phrase Liberal Media but that may open a whole 'nother can of critters.)
He states that he and his men are sick of and offended by the US medias portrayal of events over in Iraq and that the spin that the media puts on events is possibly detrimental to our services there.
That our media highlights the negative and ignores the positive.
He gives examples, many.
Examples of the unfair light in which the US is being treated by it’s own media.

A couple of quips;

"Ironically, the press freedom that we have brought to this part of the world is providing support for the enemy we fight. I obviously think it’s a disgrace when many on whom the world relies for news paint such an incomplete picture of what actually has happened. Much too much is ignored or omitted. I am confident that history will prove our cause right in this war, but by the time that happens, the world might be so steeped in the gloom of ignorance we won’t recognize victory when we achieve it. "

"Postscript: I have had my staff aggressively pursue media coverage for all sorts of events that tell the other side of the story only to have them turned down or ignored by the press in Baghdad. Strangely, I found it much easier to lure the Arab media to a “non-lethal” event than the western outlets. Open a renovated school or a youth center and I could always count on Al-Iraqia or even Al-Jazeera to show up, but no western media ever showed up – ever. Now I did have a pretty dangerous sector, the Abu Ghuraib district that extends from western Baghdad to the outskirts of Fallujah (not including the prison), but it certainly wasn’t as bad as Fallujah in November and there were reporters in there. "

This is sad, really. Even if you don’t support the war now or the reasons why we first went in, you should at least be taken aback by the unfairness of the coverage that our supposedly, unbiased, news outlets have been providing.
This is not a debate about the actual events, but the way in which they are being portrayed.

I agree with the heartwarming sentiments of LTC Ryan and wish to discuss this extremely well written column with any of you who share his thoughts or disagree with him.

I have had it with negative reporting as well.

We need to see more headlines like “All But One US Airways Flight Makes It To Its Final Destination Safely; On-Time Goals For Month Met, Officials Say”.

“The media do not report on buildings that aren’t burning.” -Geraldo.

[QUOTE=Uncommon Sense
[SNIPITY]

Even if you don’t support the war now or the reasons why we first went in…[SNIP]
[/QUOTE]

Sorry this line made me laugh. Is there anyone who can claim to support the reason why Iraq was originally invaded now that the reason given has now been finally laid to rest by the folks who started it?

Reading Ryan’s piece takes one back to the Vietnam War era, when there would be a news report about how even though 17 Marines died in Operation Grim Reaper, hundreds of Vietcong were killed and the area was cleared of the enemy.

Who would move back later when U.S. forces were gone, and somehow make good his losses.

The Iraq/Vietnam situations are not equivalent but the parallels in terms of self-deception are striking.

Off topic.

The unfairness that Ryan shows is striking in that the media WILL report the burning buildings if it reflects negatively on US forces.

Anyone remember “the Troubles” in Northern Ireland?

“War-torn Belfast”?

Damn negative media.

There were only a few thousand bombings, shootings, and kneecappings, and even that was stretched over thirty years.

And literally tens of thousands of Northern Irish people survived, most of them uninjured.

Why did the media constantly report on the negative stuff?

Beats me.

[/sarcasm]

Mr. Ryan seems to be unable to tell the difference among straight reporting, feature writing and op-ed pieces. He also seems to be arguing for censorship of the press. Can’t go for that, really.

How unfortunate and unfair all this negative press is. Of course, maybe if there were fewer negative events to report, fewer would be reported.

Not just negative, but biased. Was the media biased to one side or the other?
That is the crux of the issue. The media will bend over backwards to report that one our guys screws up but will they report when a hundred innocent civilians are beheaded by insurgents or when they use their ‘sacred’ mosques as artillery wharehouses?
This is the type of reporting I refer to. Is it right? Are you defending it? If not, then feel free to show your displeasure.

Really?, or is he saying that some of the reporting can adversely affect the operations and possibly put troops in harms way.

How ironic. If we would EVER HEAR positive reports then the negative reports wouldn’t be so overwhelming.

Nonsense. I have seen reports of that nature lots and lots of times.

At this very moment the main story on BBC is about a insurgent car bomb
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4186519.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/middle_east/2002/conflict_with_iraq/default.stm

The above link has many stories that are about how some things are starting to work.

You’re just not looking at the right news sources if you think that it’s all negative. I’d guess this is more an issue of “infotainment” than bias.

So can unrealistically positive reports; what’s your point?

Thanks for posting that.

Much of the media reports on mainstream sources are mostly doom and gloom. IMO, muchly due their bias, as they’d rather the War not go well and have us believe as such.

I realise that.
Here in the US we have our news ‘presented’ to us by the likes of the major networks and newspapers. Very few will dig into the internet to find positive aspects of the war. Kudos to you for doing that, but the reality is is that I speak on behalf of the majority of Americans who get their news spoonfed to them by the same tired spinnsters.
And even if some people do dig around for such alternative news sources they are less likely to believe them then they are the Big Three. Not all people but many.

Ryan also says;
"More recently, a major news agency’s website lead read: “Suicide Bomber Kills Six in Baghdad” and “Seven Marines Die in Iraq Clashes.” True, yes. Comprehensive, no. Did the author of this article bother to mention that Coalition troops killed 50 or so terrorists while incurring those seven losses? Of course not. Nor was there any mention about the substantial progress these offensive operations continue to achieve in defeating the insurgents. Unfortunately, this sort of incomplete reporting has become the norm for the media, whose poor job of presenting a complete picture of what is going on in Iraq borders on being criminal. "

So, not only does the media report on the negative issues but they don’t even do that completely. Ever heard the term “Sometimes it’s what you don’t say.”?

Why should we have to look for alternative positive news sources Wrath, Fear Itself, wouldn’t it make sense to have that included in the regular news?

Ned I point out the irony of these two statements? It seems you do not object to being spoon fed, so long as it is Bush-position pablum.

Within five months after suffering one of history’s most devasting military defeats at Pearl Harbor, the US was bombing Tokyo.

After more than a year in Iraq, the capital still isn’t safe. For every month from May to December, the US monthly death toll was significantly greater than the year before.

If you believe this is progress, what would defeat be like?

How praytell did you think I found that link? I was looking for something different.

You are so far off base with that comment, this has nothing to do with Bush anything. Have you nothing to say regarding the linked article? Have you actually read it?

My point is;
I know what the media is presenting to the majority of my fellow Americans and I don’t agree with it.

You, on the other hand, seem unwilling to actually comment on the actions of the media which you seem to find offensive, yet offer no criticism of.

There seems to be a great deal of effort to avoid addressing your points, Uncommon…

Perhaps the sand is more comfortable for certain heads. It’s certainly warmer and darker than having to face the simple fact that the media is focusing almost exclusively on the negative.

Did we have ground troops in Tokyo?

But, you fail to say that as far as wars go this one’s particular death toll is gloriously low for US troops. Not better than not being there, but very low as far as occupations of hostile countries goes.

Ah, but that is the question of the OP. We are lead to believe that there is no progress. What would you like to see to indicate progress?. Free Elections this month?
Reports from a field commander that things are not nearly as bad as they are protrayed? That pockets of resistance are being minimized daily?

More;
"While the media was busy bashing the Coalition, Muqtada’s boys were kidnapping policemen, city council members and anyone else accused of supporting the Coalition or the new government, trying them in a kangaroo court based on Islamic Shari’a law, then brutally torturing and executing them for their “crimes.” What the media didn’t show or write about were the two hundred-plus headless bodies found in the main mosque there, or the body that was put into a bread oven and baked. Nor did they show the world the hundreds of thousands of mortar, artillery and small arms rounds found within the “sacred” walls of the mosque. Also missing from the coverage was the huge cache of weapons found in Muqtada’s “political” headquarters nearby. No, none of this made it to the screen or to print. All anyone showed were the few chipped tiles on the dome of the mosque and discussion centered on how we, the Coalition, had somehow done wrong. Score another one for the enemy’s propaganda machine. "