[QUOTE=Wee Bairn]
I’m not talking about looks as far as the actual world of Tony Stark, I’m talking about you have a blockbuster summer action movie, its tradition to get someone attractive to play the female lead.
[/QUOTE]
Besides the fact that I think Paltrow IS attractive, she has more than that going for her. She’s a smart, sweet, genuinely nice and likable person, and that shines through in this role. She has a subtle charisma that works well with Downey’s more blatant charisma. Like Downey, she’s older than the typical superhero-movie female lead, which lends more experience to her role as a super high-level Executive Assistant. Tradition be damned. Iron Man already broke with tradition by casting Downey. They did well in their choice of Pepper too.
[QUOTE=Wee Bairn]
Those roles generally don’t get cast for acting ability, which is why you don’t see Helen Mirren as a Bond girl. Plus Paltrow is not a great actress anyway, contrary to popular opinion-
[/QUOTE]
Uh, Mirren could well have played a Bond Girl in her beautious youth, had the filmmakers had an ounce of sense. She was (and still is) a knockout. And though Paltrow has had trouble getting the roles she deserves, she also has a not-undeserved Best Actress Oscar for Shakespeare In Love. Btw, I say that (“not-undeserved”) as someone who was NOT rooting for her to win and was disappointed by her win. I still think Cate Blanchett or Fernanda Montenegro should have gotten that Oscar (or even Emily or maybe even Meryl though I haven’t seen that movie), but what I’m saying is that even though I personally believe that others deserved the Oscar more, Paltrow didn’t not deserve it. She was luminous, beautiful and wonderful in SiL.) No, she’s not a “great” actress. Paltrow is no Emily Watson or Cate Blanchett, but few are, few are.
[QUOTE=Wee Bairn]
her wooden acting nearly ruined Sky Captain, among others.
[/QUOTE]
I can’t defend that role, but I think there were other factors that came into play. That movie should have been brilliant, but something went wrong, and it, IMO, just turned out interesting and beautiful-looking, but not brilliant. Blame the script perhaps, and/or the newbie writer/director, but it’s not all Paltrow’s fault.
In any case, I was delighted to see her in Iron Man and I’m glad that, for the most part, she’s getting compliments. I’ll look forward to seeing her in the sequels.