Well, with the Rockies pulling off the greatest two-week stretch run in baseball history, we have our playoff matchups. Here’s your Division Series battles, so make your predictions!
National League
- Arizona Diamondbacks (90-72) vs. 3.Chicago Cubs (85-77)
Has there ever been a time when the BEST team in the league was just 90-72? This is partiually parity, but it’s also partially due to the NL losing a lot of games to the AL.
The D-Backs are arguably the worst 90-win team in the history of baseball; they actually allowed more runs than they scored, and were very, very lucky to win as many games as they did. There aren’t any REALLY good hitters here; Eric Byrnes had a really good season but it’s not like he’s Albert Pujols, and beyond Brandon Webb and Jose Valverde the pitching’s not spectacular. Chicago is legitimately a good, but not great, team, with vasty superior pitching. Webb could win two games for Arizona and steal this one, but Chicago’s better in every other way so I’m going for the Cubs in four.
- Philadelphia Phillies (89-73) vs. 4. Colorado Rockies (90-73)
Geez, I don’t know who to cheer for; the team that went on a huge hot streak to knock a New York team out of the playoffs, or the team that went on the greatest end-of-season hot streak EVER.
Thsi Phillies squad is actually similar to the last Phillies squad to make the playoffs, which walked off the field in shock in 1993 to fourteen years of October golf. They’re all hitting, and no pitching; then as now, the Phils have a tremendous attack featuring a multitude of guys who can get on base and hit home runs, starring an exciting, scrappy leadoff man. The pitching is, however, highly suspect, with a legitimate ace backed up by a grab bag of guys featuring a talented but frighteningly inconsistent closer.
Although Coors Field isn’t as much of a super-hitter-paradise as it once was it still warps offensive numbers quite a lot, so actually the Rockies’ hitting is not as fabulous as it appears, and their pitching is much better than it appears. Colorado’s pitching is going to be hard pressed to stop the major leagues’ best offense, but I’m not sure the Phillies could get my sister out. The teams looke evenly matched, and in that case always bet on the team with better starting pitching. Rockies in four, or five, or maybe three.
American League
- Boston Red Sox (96-66) vs. 3. Anaheim/Los Angeles/California (94-68)
Boston was actually even a bit better than the record suggest, but the loss of Tim Wakefield is a bit disconcerting. Still, they present the league’s finest pitching staff by a fairly wide margin - they allowed 42 runs FEWER than the next-best team, Toronto, which is a lot of runs - and Tim Wakefield was actually worse than the average Sox pitcher.
Anaheim is, statistically, a bit worse in almost every important respect, but the upfront pitching is respectably frightening, with Lackey and Escobar capable of beating absolutely anyone. The Angels may want to go to a 3-man rotation, because it’s a huge dropoff after Jered Weaver, and if they do, who knows. I’ll go with Boston in 4, but you never know with starting pitching that good.
- Cleveland Indians (96-66) vs. 4. New York Yankees (94-68)
Yawn, the Yankees again. Let me give you the Fox broadcast now: Jeter, Jeter, Jeter, Jeter, Jeter. The story here will probably be what Joe Torre does with his rotation, which is essentially Wang and Pettite and Pray They Forget It. The Yankees present the highest scoring offense in baseball (I gave the Phils credit for being better because they don’t use a DH, but you could argue that) and it’s just a frightening thing to face; everyone can get on base and most of them hit home runs. The TEAM batted .290. Any team that can score that easily can beat anyone, but they need the pitching to not blow up, as it was prone to do from time to time.
The Indians, by contrast, have a reputation for being a big scoring team that they do not deserve; their offense was only a bit above the AL average, and while they have some excellent hitters, there are weak spots in the lineup and their big guns aren’t as elite as New York’s. The pitching is much better than the Yankees’, however, with the 1-2 of Sabathia and Carmona having better years than any Yankee starter, and a reasonably tolerable back end. The bullpen’s a mixed bag.
New York is a better team numberswise in the 2007 season, but Cleveland is the pitching team, which is an advantage in postseason ball, so I don’t know who to pick and will go with the team with home field advantage: Cleveland in 5.