Yer. I just found your last thread that was locked and you were threatened with a mod stabbing a mere 36 hours ago.
I’ll just exit this thread, then.
There is an elasticity associated with the aether which I referred to in the second part of my response here: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=17344888&postcount=16
If you were to place a bowling ball into a tank of water the water would be displaced evenly. If there were a grid used to represent the water the grid would remain the same except for where the bowling ball now exists.
The following image represents the grid associated with water. If you were to place a bowling ball in the water the grid would not change its structure.
The bowling ball in the aether would change the grid associated with the aether. This is often described as the rubber sheet analogy. The rubber sheet analogy is not very good as it doesn’t represent the state of displacement of the aether in three dimensions.
The further you get from the object the less the aether is displaced by the object.
What is referred to as the curvature of spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the aether.
“a “field” in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position”
A “field” in physics is space filled with aether, and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its relativistic rest position.
The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid. By definition, objects will not slow down as the move through a supersolid.
Why haven’t you formalized your hypothesis and submitted it for a Nobel Prize yet?
This makes you a pamphleteer, not a peer reviewed and published scientist.
Are you expect this pdf to make its way through the aether to the Nobel Prize committee?
Nope. I expect physics to eventually pull its head out of its ass and realize the Milky Way’s halo is curved spacetime.
You’ll forgive me for not holding my breath.
You’ll forgive me for not being surprised at your inability to understand the Milky Way’s halo is curved spacetime.
That would make a great t-shirt.
Are you telling us that you have actual evidence of what happened before the event we all consider the Big Bang, that we are somehow ignoring???
I like this one:
All for understanding in a double slit experiment it is the aether which waves.
A simple search reveals that you’ve been pleading your case on various science related boards for over two years. The most frequent response has been, and continues to be, ‘Show your work!’. It seems that circular reasoning and un-tested, un-proven ideas obscured by pseudo-scientific language continue to fail to pass as evidence.
Is your approach for acceptance of your position purely to wear ‘physics’ down through the repetitive nature of your argument alone?
Don’t get me wrong. All evidence to the contrary, perhaps you are really on to something here. Perhaps what you really need is to find the Mileva Marić to your Albert Einstein. But until you do and are finally able to ‘Show Your Work!’, I’m afraid you’re in for continued disappointment.
There is no evidence of a before the Universal jet. That doesn’t mean there was, or wasn’t, a before the Universal jet, just that there is no evidence of it.
The work already exists. All mainstream physics has to realize is aether has mass, there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter and matter moves through and displaces the aether.
Curved spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether.
You can either understand it, or not.
Let’s lock mpc & karol in the same room together and see which is the first to break down.
Surely there must be some simple experiment that could be performed to confirm this, right?
I predict a nuclear reaction. Maybe even a new element.
The following is a modified so-called ‘delayed choice quantum eraser’ experiment. If the results of the experiment are as I predict nothing is delayed and nothing is erased and the two interference patterns at D0 will be discerned. A combination of Dac1 and (Dbc1 or Dbc2) will allow for one of the interference patterns at D0 to be discerned. A combination of Dac2 and (Dbc1 or Dbc2) will allow for the other interference pattern to be discerned. Interference patterns at D0 are being created regardless of what else occurs in the experiment. Since only certain photons arrive at Dac1, Dac2, Dbc1 and Dbc2 after interacting with the second beam splitter they allow for the two interference patterns at D0 to be discerned.
rofl
can i still say that? it feels dated but i couldn’t resist
ROFL