There’s always something with Clinton. The media hasn’t pursued the Epstein story yet. They also haven’t even come close to mining the Broaddick story, speaking of paying off rape accusers. Or just outright intimidating them.
I think what the convention showed is that Trump, unlike Clinton, still has upside. Everything the public has heard about him or from his own mouth has been negative. His convention speech, while not great, was probably a lot of voters’ first time listening to him directly and at length. It seems to have worked for him.
Surprise stories aren’t going to surface. If there’s anything on Trump, it’s already kicking around in the fringe media or it doesn’t exist. The examples I cited from Clinton’s past are Fox News fodder now. Which means they could become CNN and NY Times fodder in October.
All of those stories are old news – Trump is welcome to stir them up again, but it’s nothing the public hasn’t heard already, multiple times.
And I’m skeptical there’s nothing on Trump, considering that none of his Republican opponents had any substantial anti-Trump strategy, and Hillary’s team will have had half a year to dig up dirt.
But we’ll see. Your predictions are no more than dice rolls right now.
I can only wish that were true, but you can never underestimate the GOP hate machine. You’d think they couldn’t go any further after a featured convention speaker and former front-running presidential candidate basically said she worships Lucifer - but they can always go further.
Oh, look! My point is made!
Nothing more exists on Trump? Seriously? When do we get to see the tax returns, anyway?
Old news that few know about. Very few people know about Bill and Jeffrey Epstein. Broaddick is somewhat known, but Broaddick has only just revealed details of how Hillary enabled Bill’s coverup of his alleged crimes. It’s a big story if the non-Fox media choose to make it a big story.
As for Trump what’s known is known. There aren’t going to be surprises in just five months. If anything, there’s enough scandal in Trump’s life and business right now to disqualify him from the Presidency. The problem is that his bluster and misstatements get all the attention. Which could very well be by design. If we’re focused on Trump the oaf we’re not focused on Trump the criminal.
First, the GOP hate machine has never been able to damage Clinton. That’s just a comforting lie she and her supporters delude themselves with. It’s CNN and the NY Times which damage Clinton, that and an FBI director who in hindsight may have been the one to kill her campaign dead.
Second, if you’ve been around candidates and scandal enough, nothing just comes out of the blue unless you’re a casual news consumer who is shocked that Gary Hart would have an affair or that Ed Kennedy apparently drinks and drives. Everything bad there is to know about a candidate starts out sloshing around fringe media. If there is something new on Trump, it’s on Huffington Post or CommonDreams, or the Nation, or Rachel Maddow found something. There are no secrets that only Hillary Clinton’s crack team can find. That’s a vain hope and I’d hope she isn’t spending a lot of money on it. That’s the media’s job and they are eager to do it.
It has damaged her, but not as much as they would have liked. Repeating BENGHAZI!™ ad nauseam has made some otherwise reasonable people think there is something to the matter that reflects poorly on her. Likewise the phony email controversy.
Still, Democratic presidential candidates generally trail behind root canals in Georgia. That she has ever been within spitting range of Cheetoface bodes well for her.
How many did not express a preference at this point in previous elections? 20% doesn’t sound particularly unusual, and as in previous elections, a significant number are genuinely undecided, even though that was unfathomable given the choice between Romney and Obama, or McCain and Obama. Let’s stipulate that disgusted break even for each party. The undecideds are what the candidates are competing for. Will Trump appeal to them by continuing his primary campaign of fear and anger? Or will he pivot and address the issues that are important to them, which are empirically different than the Trump base? I don’t think he can, he only knows one song, and that is insult your enemies, only one of which is Hillary, and make up gloom and doom facts that you will magically fix without explaining how. Maybe he is a political savant who sees something no one else does, but I think he is just so self absorbed, he can’t or won’t recognize that the general election is different from the primaries.
How do all these models work differently if the 20% are not persons torn in painful indecision but people who simply don’t give a rat’s. Because its July.
Trump has one glaring political weakness, its located just under his nose and above his chin.