The Republicans are swine cunts

[elucidator]

Dissing a mod? But this is not the way of our people…

[duffer]

Damn, did I reveal the secret? :eek:

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

@duffer

Damn, did I reveal the secret? :eek:

Yup. There should be someone pounding on your door any minute now. Are your affairs in order?

[duffer]

Now the affair is common knowledge?!? AARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!

[lonesome_loser]

[QUOTE=duffer]
Considering the level of competence and intelligence shown around here, I trust one of you defenders of the truth will be on the ballot in 2008? If Bush was smart enough to surround himself with the people that would be able to get him elected, I have to assume you few enlightened ones could do the same. Shit, if just the members in this thread that avoid bacon based on the Bush comparison got together you’d be an obvious shoe-in. (Or is it shoo-in? Never really occured to me to ask which is correct.)

If I may paraphrase Stalin here…

I don’t care who you vote for, I count the votes.

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

@duffer

shoe-in. (Or is it shoo-in? Never really occured to me to ask which is correct.)

I meant to answer this earlier: It’s shoo-in.

[FinnAgain]

@EddyTeddyFreddy

P.S. In another Pit thread I equated FinnAgain’s Pit-posting style with yours. I’d like to retract that comparison as decidedly unfair to you.

And if you’d like to characterize my “posting style” in the Pit not by the vast majority of my posts which are calm and logically supported and continue to slander me in threads that have nothing to do with me…
~shrugs~

[EddyTeddyFreddy]

:: shrug ::

Can’t stand the heat? Get out of the kitchen.

[FinnAgain]

Oh, I can stand it.
I was merely pointing out that you are wrong.

[SteveG1]

http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Cheney2.htm

Over the last two months Mr. Cheney has been granted decreasing access to the Oval Office, the sources said on the condition of anonymity. The two men still meet, but the close staff work between the president and vice president has ended.
The sources said the indictment and resignation of Lewis “Scooter” Libby marked the final straw in the deterioration of relations between President Bush and Mr. Cheney. They said Bush aides expect that any trial of Mr. Libby, Mr. Cheney’s long-time chief of staff, would open a closet of skeletons regarding such issues as Iraq, the CIA and the conduct of White House aides.
“There’s a lack of trust that the president has in Cheney and it’s connected with Iraq,” a source said.
The sources said Mr. Bush has privately blamed Mr. Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for the U.S.-led war in Iraq. They said the president has told his senior aides that the vice president and defense secretary provided misleading assessments on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, as well as the capabilities of the regime of Saddam Hussein.

Um, yeah. Our great war preznit, who instigated a war that was condemned by the Army War Colletge in 2004 as being unnecessary and a war of choice, based on evidence that never existed (CIA report and Downing Street memo) , and who recently - along with Cheney - tried to brand all nonbelievers as traitors, and who have smeared so many people. Now the moron is trying to pin it on his own closest people, as if he had nothing to do with it (since he can’t blame the intelligence community, the military, or anyone else). He IS a pussy. It’s HIS war. It was HIS decision. HE twisted the evidence so many times and in so many directions, that NO WAY was it anything less than deliberate. But he still refuses to admit guilt. Fucking momma’s boy pansy ass wimp.

The Washington Note - Web Magazine 2021

Barbara Bush is allegedly TICKED off at Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Andy Card, nearly all of them – except Karen Hughes – for how her boy is faring in the hearts and minds of Americans.
The matriarch of the Bush clan is colder than North Pole ice right now to those around her son who she thinks have undermined him.
While TWN has been able to confirm that Laura Bush’s mother-in-law wants to do more than put coal in the stockings of the Vice President and the other top handlers of her son’s White House, we have not been able to confirm a slightly stronger bit of the rumor, which is that Barbara – not Laura – was planning to call on Nancy Reagan just to get a refresher lesson on how she took on and kicked out then Chief-of-Staff Donald Regan. (I embellish here; Barbara Bush is not going to take lessons from Nancy, it just sounded good. My source told me that Barbara was about to “pull a Nancy Reagan” on these attendants.)

Fucking momma’s boy pansy ass wimp.

[Scylla]

@SteveG1

l]

Um, yeah. Our great war preznit, who instigated a war that was condemned by the Army War Colletge in 2004 as being unnecessary and a war of choice.

No. Didn’t happen. One Prof. at the War College wrote an article (and also wrote other articles condemning the first gulf war,) This is something altogether completely different and not nearly as impressive as your hyperbolous claim.

[SteveG1]

@Scylla

No. Didn’t happen. One Prof. at the War College wrote an article (and also wrote other articles condemning the first gulf war,) This is something altogether completely different and not nearly as impressive as your hyperbolous claim.

Fair enough, I understood it had the “official blessings” but that does not negate what he had to say, and it does not negate anything else I have said or cited, does it? Either the professor was right or he wasn’t.

[SteveG1]

Continuation of pst 270 - where I cited Bush shifting blame to his “minions” …
I heard today that Rumsfeld is out, Lieberman is in, as the new Secretary of Defense. Is Cheney next?

[Scylla]

@SteveG1

Fair enough, I understood it had the “official blessings”

What do you mean by “official blessings?” I am not aware of the War College endorsing his viewpoint. Are you?

Record, the person who wrote it was simply a visiting professor at the time. His opinion of the war is not an official stance of the war college, though of course he is free to say or write whatever he likes.

The War College is pretty close and the report and the reactions to it figured pretty prominently in the local news for a while. I think I can say that his represents the minority viewpoint.

He makes some interesting and controversial arguments, and I think that’s a good thing. For example, he suggests that a certain level of terrorism is inevitable in today’s global environment. And, we need to recognize it as such rather than trying fruitlessly to eradicate it.

He also wrote a highly critical essay on the war in Iraq and another similarly critical report on Vietnam.

Record’s field is Strategic Studies. I am under the impression that his is a minority and dissenting viewpoint to the opinion of the War College faculty in general. As such characterizing his report as representing a consensus or United viewpoint of the War College is grossly innacurate.

but that does not negate what he had to say,

I haven’t tired to negate it, because we haven’t really talked about what it actually said. To do so, we’d have to read it.

and it does not negate anything else I have said or cited, does it?

What you’ve cited is interesting gossip from unnamed sources re: Bush and Cheney’s relationship (and Barbara being pissed off.) I’m not sure what to make of it, or how to credit it.

Either the professor was right or he wasn’t.

Having not read the report, I don’t know.

I’ve just been surprised that the provenance of the report has been so mischaracterized in the news.

[Scylla]

This should give you a fair view of the provenance of the report:

http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/article_01_12_04_Army_War_College.html

[World_Eater]

@SteveG1

I heard today that Rumsfeld is out, Lieberman is in, as the new Secretary of Defense. Is Cheney next?

huh?

[Frank]

@SteveG1

I heard today that Rumsfeld is out, Lieberman is in, as the new Secretary of Defense. Is Cheney next?

Double huh?

I would hope that Lieberman has enough loyalty to the party to not give up a Senate seat which would be filled by a Republican governor.

[Revtim]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21588-2005Feb13.html

There’s been K Street chatter, our colleague Jeffrey H. Birnbaum tells us, that Lieberman could be on an administration list to replace Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld in the next year or so.

[SteveG1]

@Scylla

This should give you a fair view of the provenance of the report:

http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/article_01_12_04_Army_War_College.html

OK, it was just one professor’s personal opinion. I withdraw the claim that it had War College approval, sanction or participation.