Another term of which I’m blissfully ignorant.
Don’t ask about “rimming”. Please.
Another term of which I’m blissfully ignorant.
Don’t ask about “rimming”. Please.
I’m Becky.
As becky
It means very bad things to some people. It doesn’t bother me.
Just like I’m sure guys named John could care less about the often used term john
In any case, objections to this slang term have been debated at length here:
We have a new thread where the term “karen” used as a pejorative is the topic. Several posters, including myself have said that he term is hurtful, bigoted and sexist. More or less it is taking the place of “bitch” as used as a pejorative towards women only. No one denies it is a pejorative. No one denies it is used only against women. It has the added nastiness that it is hurtful towards women who are named “karen”. The casual use of this term should be against the rules just as “bitch” …
The stewards and stewardesses on a plane have a plan. Let them carry it out. Unless you’re having a health issue you should leave them be.
There was one of those fly-on-the-wall TV documentaries over here about a budget airline some years ago, not long after smoking was banned on planes but they were still selling duty-free cigarettes. One passenger was kicking off that she wasn’t allowed to open the packet she’d bought and light up right away. The attendant said “Listen - I’ll just say this - they sell condoms in Boots*”. Hilarity all round.
*For US readers, Boots = Walgreens
The Karen is alive and well.
As fans scrambled for a homerun ball, a man came up with it and gave it to a young boy. Both were wearing Phillies gear. Moments later, a woman wearing Phillies apparel approached the man and appeared to shout at him. The man then took the ball from...
@MrDibble , here’s another example that the insult “karen” is now in widespread use in a way that has nothing to do with racial implications.
The Karen is alive and well
It doesn’t say why the man gave her the ball. It’s possible he’d snatched it from her or her kid in the first place, and was giving it back after getting called out on it. I have a hard time believing he’d just hand it over if he hadn’t done something wrong.
It’s possible he’d snatched it from her or her kid in the first place, and was giving it back after getting called out on it.
From what I read that’s pretty much what happened.
no, from what I read on MSN, father rescued ball by vacant seats, gave ball to son, then “karen” ran over and confronted him screaming in his face, so to calm the situation gave her the ball. there’s a company offered her $5000 for ball with “I’m sorry” written on it
from what I read on MSN, father rescued ball by vacant seats,
Maybe you should watch the video…
I never said it wasn’t used that way. Just that I didn’t use it that way, and neither did the originators.
Although - not sure why you’re calling me out in this thread, as it was a completely different thread we had that convo in.
Yes, from the video, it looks rather like the ball came to her, he barreled over and grabbed it from her, (probably before she took unambiguous possession) trotted back to his seat to give it to his son, and then she followed him to his seat and yelled at him, and he took the ball from his son and gave it to her.
It’s quite obvious why she was pissed. I have no idea what the “norm” is. Maybe he acted entirely within the norm. If so, the norm scares the hell out of me.
thank you for clarifying this for me–now I see why she felt she was treated unfairly
I’d say you can’t grab it out of somebody’s hand, but it’s a free-for-all otherwise. Doesn’t matter if you came over a section to grab it. Until that ball is secure in someone’s hand, it’s there for the taking. To me, it looks like it’s fairly dad’s ball, but I guess I don’t have a perfect angle on whether the ball is in that woman’s hand or not when he grabs it. I don’t think it is, but that’s just a guess.
eh, yeah I think this is generally correct, but it’s also contextual. I mean, I think it’s fine to grab a home run ball bouncing around on the seats before the guy next to you does, but I’m not going to be wading into a swarm of 8 year old’s to see if I can catch a foul ball because I have a longer reach than them or snatch a ball that a player clearly intended to toss to someone else at the end of an inning.
I mean, sure. Everything is context dependent. Definitely not cool going full bore after kids, elderly, disabled, etc. I’m also the type who would give away my ball to the nearest kid, which I know people vary opinions on.
Agreed.
A ball coming generally your way happens fast. Not a lot of time for nuanced reasoning. But if your preconceived notion is that trampling women & children is OK, well, you’re not a Karen or Chad. You’re an asshole.
Given the nature of catching a ball, both contenders’ eyes & brains are totally focused on the ball, so hand to hand collisions are gonna occur. What happens next ought be more considered than that.
I read somewhere the dad’s account of what happened - everyone was watching the ball and then it landed on the empty seat in front of the Karen and was bouncing around. When he reached for the ball it stopped and he got it first. When confronted by the screaming woman, he gave the ball up so as not to risk additional escalation in front of his kid. IMHO any way you look at it, once the ball was in a kid’s hand it’s game over. Karen was out of line.
Yeah, that’s what it seemed like to me, but hard to tell from camera angle, but the last part — you don’t take a ball from a kid if you want to come out looking good.
IMHO any way you look at it, once the ball was in a kid’s hand it’s game over.
Yeah. It didn’t belong to her; her life is no poorer two minutes after the incident than before. Was this incident on a Jumbotron? If so, I wish the Jumbotron operator had keyed up “Let it Go”.