There are specific ways to take down individuals depending on the extent of the threat that individual may pose.
I have seen 140 lb young (compared to me) women take down 200lb prisoners who were stone sober, distressed and bent upon harm others or themselves.
One drunk male is not very capable of making effective defensive judgements, and is a far better proposition to deal with. What we have here is quite a number of law enforcement officers with not much clue, we have a number of them pretty much intervening only to contribute to a beating, not to immobilise or even to make an arrest.
Proper physical intervention is as much about self protection and protection of the subject, and no time could I see this taking place. We regularly have to make interventions, we don’t have tasers or firearms, and usually batons are not extended, in fact use of movement restriction with batons has to be justified in every single incident, use of force in every case is also subject to post event oversight and scrutiny.
There was no leadership in the Rodney King arrest whatsoever, and that as much as anything is what led to the beating.Not one of those law officers used the proper equipment they have available for this sort of activity, other than the taser - which they relied upon exclusively to immobilise their man, they didn’t even follow up the taser shot properly - which show a startling lack of competence.
When taser is deployed the idea is to follow it up extremely quickly whilst the subject is still trying to recover, in this case, not so much.
As an example of training this was a superb example of what not to do - which was mainly a case of half measures and lack or proactive measures, they pretty much left the initiative up to the subject, I hope you can understand what is wrong with that and perhaps even realise this could have been dangerous to both the officers and the subject.
Force must be applied proportionally, quickly, effectively. Its not how hard you go in, its all about what you do and how you do it.