Everyone knows that condoms don’t prevent AIDS. So just poke a hole in one end.
And shipped to them by truck…
Hemophiliacs have asses on their sides?
I don’t recall any mention of homosexuals in the Constitution, nor do I think that it is fair to attribute the stupid comments of one person to an entire group of people.
Anything that Congress does, that it does not have the power to do, is a violation of the Constitution. If you don’t understand that, then you need to further your education before we can discuss it. Obamacare, social security, medicare, the Department of Energy, are a good start. This discussion is going to get very large, and very boring, if I try to bring up everything the government is doing that it should not be, so let’s start with these four things. Please, tell me which enumerated power justifies them.
Please enumerate why you believe that Congress does not have the power to do these things.
It is every bit as dumb as saying, “All of the tea baggers I’ve met feel this way”, which was exactly my point. Stupid comment deserves a stupid response.
Cite for where I said “all of the tea baggers I’ve met feel this way” you lying whore.
Your link provides no information whatsoever about what percentage of people pay taxes.
Ah, so you are a complete fucking idiot. Goodbye.
No, but it does point out that blue states tend to pay a hell of a lot more in federal tax per person than red. Which means this:
is irrelevant even if true, and most likely BS.
It took you until *just then *to figure it out? Really? Really?
P.S. I invited **Bricker **to come play with the claims of various things being unconstitutional. I really hope he shows up.
I’d guess the percentage of people who don’t pay taxes is way over 47%. I mean look at all those children running around all over the place. I’ll bet you not one of those fucking free loaders has ever even filled out a W2 let alone filed an income tax return.
And don’t get me going on the severely handicapped.
That wasn’t the point of my message, but if you can’t respond to my point, OK, we can argue this instead. Why don’t you enlighten me? Explain what 35,000 over the tandems does to the roads in 200 miles of driving, and why this hard-working driver should have been forced to pay for a ticket?
I assume that if you had a reason why the highwaymen at the scales should feel implelled to try to double this driver’s fine by withholding the documentation of his accusation, you would have responded to that, so I’ll show you some pity and let you slide on that part of it. Consider it your sympathy fuck for the day.
That’s like saying, “You loath the government, yet you expect the prosecutor to produce evidence when he charges you with a crime”?
I know there are non-stupid conservatives out there. But why don’t they ever come here?
I’m opposed to government control of health care, not specifically paying for it, but that’s beside the point.
The paradox is, the homos want the government to pay for AIDS, but they don’t want the government to tell them that they can’t have anal sex with each other. I’m saying that they can’t “have it both ways”, so to speak.
Wow.
I am reminded of a government-sponsored medical advertisement in which we were told that women should urinate both before and after sex. Ouais, ça te bande, n’est-ce pas? Your tax dollars at work.
Found that cite yet, you lying whore?
Please disprove a negative.
It degrades the roads at a faster rate than planned, costing more money in repairs. Money that the state and federal government ends up having to pay. Unless you think highways are an unconstitutional abuse of federal powers?
Because he broke the law. If he was speeding because the client wanted it there faster, it would still be his fault. We have a society with rules, the driver failed to follow those rules.
I’d tell you more, but it’s very complicated, and you wouldn’t understand.