Because there aren’t any non-stupid liberals here to argue with.
And we’ve reached a new low.
If you want to make it more complicated, try responding to my original post, not the part that you plucked out to change the context.
Do you piss during? I suppose it would distract from your powerful stupid.
If you ignore facts and cites and simply restate your premise, you aren’t really debating.
You’re just an angry, ignorant old bitch. But I have to admit, it is entrancing seeing you try to keep up.
I ignore facts that don’t support an argument, except for the few cases in which I’ve pointed out that they don’t. As an example, posting a link to revenue by state does not refute the suggestion that only 47% of Americans pay income tax.
What, me angry? Look at all of the personal insults I keep receiving, and ignoring. Who sounds angry around here?
To keep up with what? You? laugh
Are we still assuming that Morella is female? I’m having trouble with that.
Did he/she ever explicitly claim to be a woman? Sure, he/she hates the gays, but also used the term “diaperhead” earlier, and kinda/sorta claimed to be middle-eastern (at least to the same extent that he/she claimed to be female.)
Can you name any liberals whom you admire for their intellect?
If they pay more, it is because businesses are headquartered there. It does not mean that the majority of people in the blue areas pay more income tax, which, you and I both know, is nonsense. People are allowed to vote whether they pay tax or not, and that, not the total amount of revenue collected, is the point.
You ignore things that do not fit the narrative that you’ve decided to internalize. But since you’re stupid enough to think that shooting illegal aliens is an intelligent policy plan, I suspect that you simply are unable to do any better.
You sound angry. You sound like an angry old failure that can’t cut it in her/his business and flails around blaming the government for her/his stumbles.
Instead of bitching about the government or taxes, why not build a comfortable life and take responsibility for your future?
I’ve stopped trying to argue with you when I realized that you have no intention of even trying to be an honest debater.
It’s easy to be right when you just make shit up, isn’t it?
When did I say that I hated gays? Although it was mostly ignored, aside from one comment that did not merit a response, I suggested that I might enjoy eating pussy.
If you want to argue for or against something that I said, or something that I am, your argument will be worth more if you stick to what I actually said, not what you think I said, and not what you wish that I had said because it would make it easier for you to win an argument (the strawman).
If you don’t understand something that I say, as in the “Golden Age of Government Control” comment, you are welcome to ask for clarification. At this point, I can assure you, there is no point in worrying that I’m going to think you are stupid. That bridge has been crossed.
They do, but you call them stupid. Invariably. And more will come, and you will call them stupid. Invariably. Rinse and repeat, ad infinitum.
Given your unfailing propensity for calling everyone you disagree with “stupid”, or a “moron”, or variations thereof, I’d be keenly interested to know your I.Q. and/or level of educational acheivement. You know, something that would give us at least a hint as to your standing or qualifications to declare so many people stupid…because, you know, your posts themselves fall waaay short.
Can you name any conservatives whom you admire for their intellect?
Actually, you make a good point. People disagree for a lot of reasons, and very seldom do these reasons have anything to do with someone being less intelligent than anyone else. Assuming that someone is not intelligent because they do not agree is a sign of immaturity.
What is your sex and race?
Please, quote all of the instances in which I have accused people of being stupid for disagreeing with me. Take out the ones in which I was only responding in kind, and you will have a very large negative number. And see my previous post.
That wasn’t so difficult, was it? Female, and mixed.
Found that cite to what you claimed I said, you lying whore?
I only call people stupid who do stupid things. Disagree with me all you want. I want disagreements. Ignore facts to support your “gut instinct” and I’ll call you stupid.
There are people in this very thread that are more educated than me. That doesn’t mean they can’t hold stupid ideas. For instance, thinking that liberals have been working to destroy society for the last fifty years is a stupid idea. And anyone seriously holding it is simply unable to think hard enough to gain a reasonable view of reality.
Surely we can both agree about that, right?
However, assuming someone is not intelligent because they think that illegal aliens should be shot is perfectly reasonable. It’s a sign that they can’t model situations in a remotely realistic manner. It’s a cartoon view of reality that bespeaks an inability to think hard or deep.