The Third Jihad-recommended viewing

What is it about July? Is it the heat?

Someone will like it and others won’t, no big. When we get a few people commenting on this then I’ll invoke my opinion. Personal attacks, keep em coming, it’s your dime…

I watched part of the oeuvre. If the characterization of the dramatis personae is overall weak and the plotlines are quite full of holes, I found that the themes presented by this opus were interesting - man’s inhumanity to man, the essence of mistrust and phobia, the banal alienation of modern life, all laid bare by the artist in a vivid neo-modern canvas pulsating in tune with America’s zeitgeist of utter fuckwittery.

Hang on, what’s the artsy-fartsy word for “fuckwit” ?

When I was in India last summer, I saw this woman wearing a burqa decorated with lots of sparkly blue sequins. If my burqa can also be covered in sequins, I would appreciate that.

kthnxbye

I’m teetering on the end of my stool.

“Postmodernist”

Normal people don’t do that, they just wipe and flush, Activia might help…

Are you elucidator’s sock? :stuck_out_tongue:

Obviously not. It was actually funny.

I can’t watch it - I haven’t seen The First Jihad or The Second Jihad yet, and I don’t want to ruin the whole thing by watching them out of order.

And that was even funnier. Well done.

THERE we go. I was opening all the links, looking for that.

Yes, now that you mention it, that does sound like a good way to deal with the Tea Partiers! :slight_smile:

You need to ask? :wink:

I don’t think your objections necessarily work. One can be a Muslim and yet Islamophobic. You can be part of any group, yet be prejudiced or unnecessarily fearful of that same group.

It’s not the heat; it’s the stupidity.

So I take it you didn’t like it Mr. 3, or did I take that out (stupidity) of context?

Reasoned and informed explication of OP’s opinions coming in …

ohhh fuck it, probably never.

So, you chose to quote, but ignore the last sentence. Odd. you’ve not countered the point I’ve made. You attacked a position in which my objection summed up in Sentence #2 would “necessarily” work, i.e., work in all instances. I’m not of that opinion. Which explains why I added the third sentence. You know, the one you chose to ignore.

By the way, did you watch the video?

Only the third jihad? Those are toddler jihadists. I don’t take anyone seriously until the’re jihad teens – 13 or more.