Having read the actual article, you cite the “firing tear gas at children” part but ignore this:
I honestly don’t see the problem. I’m all for treating these people with compassion and offering them help and a legal path to entry, but if they are going to act like animals they can fuck off and go back where they came from.
If you don’t want your kids to get gassed, don’t try to hurdle a fence right in front of the cops! Duh!
Uh, it is very likely that those jumpers did not have little children with them. As usual, it is the ones that are not doing the illegal thing the ones who get affected.
They “act like animals” because they’ve led a pretty harsh existence, which doesn’t entitle them to be able to jump a fence, but I think it entitles them to some compassion and understanding. The real issue, as I (and apparently others) see it, is that rather than working with Mexico and Latin American countries to perhaps find a more constructive and non-dramatic way to resolve an international humanitarian crisis, Trump has deliberately sought to maximize the political utility of the situation, and in so doing, he is potentially making a manageable humanitarian situation into a full-blown political crisis. Fuck Trump, not the migrants. Show some fucking leadership, maybe.
How many personnel, including troops, did Trump send to the border? Imagine what we could have accomplished if he’d sent the same number of people down there to process asylum claims, and to separate gang members and terrorists (if any) from those truly seeking safety and security.
I think we’re seeing what nativists and anti-immigration activists want, an example that they can use to inflame passions so that they can engender alarm and antipathy toward non-European immigration.
The United States government, yesterday, fired tear gas into another country. At toddlers. Wave your hands however you want, but we are the only villains in that story.
What is the status of Plan Frontera Sur (the USA funded plan/operation for Mexico to stop people from illegally crossing Mexico’s southern border)? Is the USA still shovelling money to Mexico for this?
Article I read said things got out of hand after officials refused to let any migrants approach the point of entry. Isn’t that the legal way for them to proceed?
Well, if we encourage them do it legally, then we won’t have a reason to tear gas them, amirite? There goes a great photo-op. “People standing in line.” Bo-ring! That won’t make the front page.
I’ve only read the details sporadically, but this seems to have been the Trump strategy all along. Close or otherwise obstruct the normal point of application (which I believe is required to be there by international law), then call people animals and use force when they try to enter through another point.
Please fact check me on this, I may be out of date or mistaken.
To change up the clusterfuckery discussion a bit, GM to slash production and jobs, from line workers to executives, as tariffs on steel have cost it over $1 billion this year. So. Much. Winning!!
It’s been something they did before the child-separation policy; applications for asylum not taken at point of entry, while removing the ability to present them if you’re already in the country.
I’m all for “let people use the legal paths”, but that’s only valid so long as there are legal ways.