Your horror imagination needs some tweaking. Sure, couples would most likely have to sleep in separate rooms with the door closed and all that. Sucks, but people will adapt.
However, what happens if a fetus dies 6 months in utero? Hmmmmm? No horror/chills with that?
Interesting, I was wondering what the flashes were supposed to mean and it never occured to me that it was Shane’s mind that was doing that.
Either they simply weren’t infected when they died, or they did reanimate but were trapped in the car with the windows rolled up in a Georgia summer and baked to (re)death. I assume being turned into jerky is just as effective in the long run as a head wound.
Well the farmhouse isn’t big enough for everyone to have their own bedroom. Also small children would need to be locked into some sort of cage to sleep. I’ve don’t recall miscarriages ever being address in any zombie film. Well the remake of Dawn of the Dead did have a zombie baby, but the mother was already bitten and a zombie when she gave birth. Also that wasn’t an “everyone who dies reanimates” scenario either. A zombie infant is disturbing enough (though IMHO it gets downright comical if the audience is allowed to actually see it), but a fetus reanimating inside it’s mother’s womb? Who far along would the pregnancy need to be for it to reanimate anyway? Would embryos & zygotes be a threat as well?
The other explanation for the hospital scene that I had considered at the time was that the soldiers were somewhat rationally ordered to kill everybody there in a “shotgun approach” to exterminate everybody that might be sick due to the zombie virus.
But I still think there’s something to the theory of a not-so-dormant virus. It goes a long way to explaining how society deteriorated so quickly.
The other niggling question to consider is the whole genesis of the zombie virus. Could it have been some sort of bio-weapon deployed by a hostile nation? CDC experiment gone awry?
I find it completely plausible that Little Mister Unsupervised went back for the gun, but when Rick told him to keep it all I could think was "Did you really just GIVE him DARRYL’S gun? Really? Like you don’t have another gun you could give the kid? What the hell?
Yeah. I mean, a scene where Rick discusses it with Darryl would have been boring and flow-breaking (and there’s already plenty of that to go around), but Rick could have tossed out a throwaway line like “Keep it. I’ll talk to Darryl.”
My niggling nitpick for this week’s episode - the way those idiots were trying to nail boards. Tink tink tink… - I think you would have needed a sledgehammer to pound a nail through those boards Shane had, and the other guy was just playing with those nails.
When did he go back and get it? Before Dale died? We’re expected to believe that he went back to the same woods where the zombie that he’d effectively freed was roaming? Stupid. So after Dale died, then? When? Dale died at night–surely even “Shittiest Mom Ever” at least keeps tabs on her kid at night after a zombie attack. The episode resumes the next morning, and Carl gives the gun to Shane early in the day. Even then, if Carl did go get it that morning, they have to show us why we were supposed to take note that it was dropped. Remeber, they focussed on it when it dropped, so we were supposed to say, “Hey, Carl just dropped the gun he stole from Darryl. Wonder how that’s gonna play out.” Folks on here were speculating that Randall would find it, or Darryl would reach for it and it wouldn’t be there. But no. Next day, Carl has it. No explanation. No purpose behind the drop other than to create a plot hole, calling for one more fanwank patch.
Anybody else disappointed with the zombie makeup on Randell & Shane? It should’ve been much subtler IMHO. Hell, Shane was only dead for a few minutes; he should’ve have had zombie makeup on at all.
Agreed. How can this be such a huge showstopper for people? He got it when he wasn’t on camera. Big deal.
My question is why the two punks in the bar didn’t reanimate, since they had plenty of time to do so. I don’t recall whether they were headshot or not. I don’t find it upsetting that they didn’t, though, since we don’t really know anything about how this works other than that it worked on Shane and Randall sans bite. Maybe it only works that way on brunettes, or people who haven’t had alcohol in their system for more than 48 hours, or people whose first names come after “Quentin,” alphabetically.
Did you read through the thread? Its been postulated by many that its a combination of the increase in noise they’d been making lately what with all the gunfire and hammering and yelling, along with the fact that (Herschel?) one of the characters mentions that one of their natural barriers, the creek/river or whatever was causing the walkers to get stuck in the mud, dries up “this time of year”.
That’s an interesting point re: the guys in the bar. I don’t think they were both shot in the head, but maybe they were. If they weren’t, then that’s some sloppy editing to introduce this new twist like that with no explanation on the second to last episode of the season. It’ll be interesting to hear the characters discussing this new wrinkle in the next episode at any rate.
They clearly showed us headshots on both. Rick killed the guy who was behind the bar reaching for the gun with a perfect headshot, spun around and shot the fat guy in the chest, then stepped closer, aimed at his head, and shot again.
EDIT: I think that week’s thread also had a couple mentions of Zombieland’s “double tap” rule in reference to the bar shootout.