[quote=“Hentor_the_Barbarian, post:198, topic:735757”]
And? Since you seem confused, I’ll tell you the problem, but be forewarned, it contains spoliers:
The only thing I’m confused about is why you need spoiler tags in a thread that contains the words OPEN SPOILERS in the title.
[quote=“SykoSkotty, post:201, topic:735757”]
Oh shit. You’re one of those people. This is an argument I don’t give a fuck about. See ya.
Open spoilers for the episode we’re discussing, not the entire series. Which any thinking person should consider obvious.
I must not be thinking well today. The post in the spoiler tag had information about what has not yet happened?
Yes, obviously. Hentor already explained it, but I guess it’s still too confusing for some. I’ll give it a shot:[spoiler]The link includes a picture of the cast on set, including Glen, in a scene with a character who has not yet been introduced on the show. Therefore, Glen will appear in a future timeline on the show. Thus he is not dead.
The “character who has not yet been introduced” is named Jesus, and is apparently well known to readers of the comics, if that helps you understand any better.[/spoiler]
The title of this thread is - The Walking Dead; 6.03 “Thank You” (open spoilers)
I posted an “open spoiler” related to the events that occurred in TWD 6.03, which upset another member. I tried to work with that member and asked a mod to add spoiler brackets to my post.
The OP didn’t request - no spoilers - but I understand why some people don’t appreciate spoilers. When requested, only established TV characters and TV scripts would be included. Predictions would be allowed, of course. Attempts at humor would be allowed. But no comic book-only characters, no video game situations, and no slip-ups by the entertainment media.
This is not accurate. You posted a photo from a future episode - not 6.03. A photo that comes from a site called “The Spoiling Dead”.
The title of the Youtube video is -
The Walking Dead: Season 6 - GLENN IS ALIVE!!! (Theories, PROOF, & Speculation)
Someone identifying himself as thezeustuber created a video where he speculated as to why Schrodinger’s Glenn is still alive. He discussed Glenn’s alleged 6.03 death in detail, and he included a (future?) cast photo that had been released by ET (entertainment tonight) to support his theory.
Okay, a mistake was made and it was fixed. Let’s get back to the discussion of the show and off the subject of spoilers and what should have or should have not been spoiled.
Also, it’s as simple as:
If the talk is discussing this actual, specific show, it can be spoiled (if the person sees fit) or not (since the title says “Open Spoilers”)
If the talk is discussion about possible future happenings, please put it under a spoiler box.
Let’s dial back the slight hostilities now about a mistaken, unboxed spoiler and get back to the show.
If anyone wants to really rehash what went on, however, feel free to talk in PM, the Pit, or ATMB if you don’t like anything this note says.
I don’t like what this note says!
Well, more specifically, I think it could have been formatted a little nicer, as bullet points or at least with more consistent line spacing. Harrumph!
[QUOTE=Bryan Ekers;18826786 at least with more consistent line spacing. Harrumph![/QUOTE]
Yeah, in-consistent line spacing angers me more than spoilers or arguing about them, and socks.:dubious: