The worst of the worst (SDMB version)

Seems you read a different thread than I did.

  1. D’Anconia’s first post (quoted) denies monstro’s claim that:
  1. But in the Wikipedia article D’Anconia links too, we have the statement that

monstro did never claim anything about the age of Sylvester Magee. She didn’t even mention the name, for chrissakes.

So, from what I can see:

  1. D’Anconia attacks another poster’s comments by citing an article, which, explicitly, supports her comments
  2. He then proceeds to attack a claim she didn’t make
  3. You, for some reason, make the link between a possible lie and another claim

Why?