A good “oops”. That link takes you right to the page. Scroll down to “medical opinions”. Disregard the linking info I just supplied above.
You know what’s really strange about this link, it can be edited by anyone, hardly something that one would believe in.
Here’s the source of that is linked to on that page:
http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050318/NEWS01/503180350/1006
Glad I can help you.
You know what’s even stranger? That link is literally filled with links to primary sources, especially legal documents, that confirm what it says. Fancy that.
Here is what the court found then, regarding the scan and the verdict of 2002:
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder11-02.txt
The Problem for Dr. Maxfield was that his opinion was not deemed credible.
The doctors the Schindlers found to support their position, were what I would call quacks…
The more I read of the court decisions, the angrier I get at congress and the president being so ignorant.
IIRC there was a government office that gave unbiased scientific information to congress on controversial topics until the late 90’s, now I see that closing that department was a colossal mistake.
Where in heck they got their info on this case?
From the lies Terri’s parents told everyone.
(more of the same, just pointing out the guilty party)
This sort of thing is what really scares me about paranormal nonsense.
Every sentence bleeds with using total crap to make decisions.
“AWWWWW WAAAAAAAA” had more validity.
I am really glad you cleared that up for us.
Horse to water and all that.
You can stick a feeding tube into a horse, but you can’t make it drink. No wait! You can make it drink.
The mission of the board is to fight ignorance, not foster it.
Really? Here I thought it was to find truth – hence “Straight Dope.”
Of course, everyone knows that ignorance is all those things people believe that you don’t. I fight ingnorance also. Heck, we all fight ignorance.
Even assuming the spirit exists doesn’t mean we have to assume that people can communicate with spirits.
Instead of all the evidence one persistently and willfully ignores?
You don’t find ignorance when you ask people to set aside their demands for proof of highly dubious claims. You foster it.
As for the mission of the SDMB, heck – look at that thing up there with the name of the board. See the second line?
Wanted to talk about spiritual healing.
In Russia psychics work alongside doctors to help the patients. They have done this for many years. There are other countries where spiritual people are working with doctors on a day-to-day basic. Even here in America, in Boston, one of the Hospitals had some of their nurses learn Reiki, which is a type of spiritual healing. The nurses liked to use it and their patients improved faster than those who didn’t get Reiki.
Accupuncture, chi, and other forms of oriental healing are spiritual in nature.
Unfortunately in this country our young are taught that any from of spiritualism is ignorance and superstition. This teaching has been applied for more than a decade now, and during that time the suicide rate has tripled. Depression, mental illness, anxiety attacks and other mental (spiritual) maladies are on the increase. By trying to eliminate all vestages of religion and spiritualism science has eliminated the “tools” used to cope with these illnesses for centuries.
It is well known that “12 step” programs using spiritual tools cure more people of additions than secular programs.
In spiritualism healing is accomplished by love, the unconditional spiritual kind of love. Those who have an excess of it pass it to those who need it. Only spiritual people who practice love will be any good at helping healing others.
People can heal themselves by using spiriual tools and live peaceful, happy lives. I will not list any of the tools here, those who are really interested can easily find them.
In the OP it talks about how if everyone knew they had a spirit. The proper way to put that is if everyone knew they were spiritual would that improve the world we live in? It doesn’t seem to make a difference now among those that believe. I agree with this, knowing that you are spiritual doesn’t make you kind and loving.
However knowing the consequences of your actions might do the trick. In some near death experiences the individual goes through a life review. His life on earth is played back for him with one important difference. He gets to feel exactly how each person he interacted with felt. If he helped someone, he felt their joy, if he hurt someone he felt their pain. Now all NDEs don’t have life reviews, but I know of no experiencer who didn’t change his life style because of the experience. They, I, saw what our deeds, actions, and thoughts did to us. So, we, I, became a lot more tolerant and loving of our fellow man.
If there were some way to teach others this, some churches do teach this, it would help. Spiritual justice is perfect, all kindness is rewarded, and all hurts are redressed.
Even if this statement were remotely accurate, you might consider that spirituality is associated with reduced stress and feelings of helplessness, which, tentatively, may correlate positively with improved prognosis, at least for some ailments. Non-spiritual stress-coping mechanisms (such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, guided imagery, etc.) have also shown efficacy in terms of improved recovery outcome, though those claims are also rather tentative. Further research on the subject is needed, but it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that much of what falls in the heading of “spiritual healing” is simply an elaborate means of achieving a salutogenic psychological state, and further, that it may be possible to promote such a state with equal efficacy in patients with no spiritual beliefs through the use of psychotherapy. This approach might have the added benefit of being controlled, e.g., it might limit the exposure of patients to harmful substances used in certain “alternative” remedies, or simply victimization by quacks and scammers who prey on the weak and gullible.
Dr. Gary Schwartz uses flawed methods, says Ray Hyman, professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Oregon.