Needs to be in the Pit, IMHO.
I find it incomprehensible that anyone would even care. Even granted that some men think of women as a collection of body parts they want to look at instead of an actual human being, this is a completely arbitrary standard created no more than a couple of years ago.
Are people so mindless that the immediately accept something like this as an actual standard?
Moderator Action
Let’s try IMHO instead. Feel free to start a Pit thread about it though, if you want.
Moving thread from General Questions to In My Humble Opinion.
I’ve heard this said over and over, but is there any proof that being thin makes you less fertile/less likely to successfully have babies? It all just seems a little like an evolutionary just-so tale after a while, but with no actual meaning attached to it.
Well said!
Also well said.
Ornery Bob for the win!
You know what big ears mean?
What about guys who like their women thick?
Allan does by definition.
That he’s a Ferengi? ![]()
You have to have a minimum percentage of body fat to menstruate, which kind of helps in having a baby the old-fashioned way.
No, but you could ask Noddy.
Damn good hearing.
Assuming the OP is serious, I find it hard to believe that *he *believes there exists a “very very large majority of men who hate thigh gaps”. Sorry, but that just flies in the face of what is and has been the “ideal” for women’s bodies for many years now. Sure, he might dislike thigh gaps (that has a somewhat oogy sound to me) but I just won’t believe for a minute that he’s in the majority. I also find it hard to believe a man who says he’s never heard of noticed them either, but that at least sounds more plausible.
Also, I agree with everything **elbows **said with one caveat; there is a vast difference between the ridicule faced by the overweight than the underweight (females that is). It’s shitty and wrong to judge anyone based on their looks, but I don’t think these to groups have it exactly the same. Fat people truly do get condemned. Buy yeah, shallow, judgmental people are cordially invited to piss off.
Sure, but a minimum percentage of body fat still includes thin women. That still encompasses an enormous range of women.
The size of the gap does not matter.
It’s what’s inside that counts.
Preferably me. 
Other than the answer about menstruation:
First, women have wider hips than men to allow the baby to pass through. In some ways, this is confusing fat with bone structure, but it’s still the case that a woman who is thin thanks to narrow hips may have more trouble delivering.
Second, it’s relatively rare that humans can count on reliable nutrition during pregnancy. Only in parts of the modern world can we take 2000 calories of nutritious food for granted. Once upon a time, if Og wasn’t able to kill a mammoth, a little extra body fat was the difference between baby surviving or not. That’s true even after the birth when the baby relies on milk.
Could someone please tell me what the devil a “thigh gap” is? An article of clothing?
I was going to see if Jennifer Lawrence has a thigh gap.
Then I realized: the point is that I don’t know if Jennifer Lawrence has a thigh gap.
It means that you can stand upright without your thighs touching. You can Google in a safe-for-work sense. You might get lots of pictures of swimsuits and underwear, but it shouldn’t be pornographic.
Some people define it very narrowly to mean that your knees are touching, but your thighs are not touching at any point. Other people seem to take a broader definition that some part of the thighs not touching is still called a thigh gap.
Again, it has a lot to do with bone structure and propositions, not just body fat.