[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
I just hope no insolent Mod locks this thread!
[/QUOTE]
Agreed, this topic is far too important to let go, even though there isn’t a single person in the entire world who knew the topic existed for the last 10 months.
[QUOTE=Cluricaun]
Is that a cookie? I hate that file. If I delete it after downloading then it either makes me do it again, or it displays the front page in code gibberish. Sometimes I go months without it asking again, and then sometimes I have to do it 3 or 4 times a day.
[/QUOTE]
That is due to the cookie setting in your browser. I allow cookies. Not the best thing in the world, but it makes life easier and so far no problems.
It never prompts me and I never delete it at home or at work. I only delete it when I am surfing the dope from somewhere else. I do not want to chance a Hal incident. ![]()
Jim
BrainGlutton, I am going to ask you this in a very serious tone and I want you to be completely honest with us. We won’t get mad at you, we just want to find you the right treatment.
Are you on drugs?
[QUOTE=Rigamarole]
BrainGlutton, I am going to ask you this in a very serious tone and I want you to be completely honest with us. We won’t get mad at you, we just want to find you the right treatment.
Are you on drugs?
[/QUOTE]
I think the board rules don’t allow discussion of current drug use. ![]()
[QUOTE=samclem]
I think the board rules don’t allow discussion of current drug use. ![]()
[/QUOTE]
He did not ask about illegal drugs, he was obviously asking about prescription drugs. Gee, samclem, amazing where your mind went immediately.
Jim ![]()
[QUOTE=What Exit?]
He did not ask about illegal drugs, he was obviously asking about prescription drugs. Gee, samclem, amazing where your mind went immediately.
[/QUOTE]
Yes. I call for an immediate inspection of the film canisters in sam’s sock drawer, and an immediate parceling out of the evidence to those of us who can be trusted to… um… er… destroy it.
[QUOTE=Frank]
Yes. I call for an immediate inspection of the film canisters in sam’s sock drawer, and an immediate parceling out of the evidence to those of us who can be trusted to… um… er… destroy it.
[/QUOTE]
You do know the only thorough method of destruction is to incinerate it.
On a serious note. Why are you accusing **sam ** of having multiple socks. I find that hard to believe. Are you sure about this? It is quite the serious charge.
We should slowly review this for the next 9½ months and then pit him for it if it is true.
Jim
[QUOTE=What Exit?]
On a serious note. Why are you accusing **sam ** of having multiple socks. I find that hard to believe. Are you sure about this? It is quite the serious charge.
[/QUOTE]
It’s clear you’ve never been inside. **Frank **was talking about looking for a film cannister. “Sock drawer” is prison lingo for … well, you know.
[QUOTE=Frank]
What brought this on, BrainGlutton? Did you get a parking ticket?
[/QUOTE]
More likely a farking ticket.
[QUOTE=jackelope]
Why original ATMB thread was locked: Because it was answered. ATMB isn’t generally known for long, looping discussions on such topics; in fact, the original thread had several suggestions that you bring up related issues in GD.
[/QUOTE]
I guess that’s the part I didn’t understand. I think of thread-locking as more in the nature of a sanction for misbehavior or total-clusterfuck derailment (except when used to eliminate duplicate concurrent threads on the same news).
That all, really.