Yes, yes. This brings me to that other unfortunate and wholey unconsitutional mandate. The one overlooked in the whole Obamacare debate.
The idea that the goverment can force you to buy clothing!
Don’t think they can? Just try going without.
This thread is simply too sad to be funny.
**This board is a bunch of hypocritical douchebags **
This revelation took you 12 years?
You are a slow learner. I hope I’m not typing too fast for you.
You also forgot that we are the smartest hypocritical douchebags on the net. The problem with your clothes is not a little ink, but too little ink. Buy yourself a bottle of ink and put it and all your clothes back in the washer. You will no longer have ink spots on your work clothes. You will probably start a fashion trend of ink-dyed garments. Bic Chic.
No thanks needed, that’s what we are here for.
Is there an operationalised scientifically accepted measure of “reproductive success”? Haldane was famed for discussing the Creator’s “inordinate fondness for beetles” - or in sourced form, “The Creator would appear as endowed with a passion for stars, on the one hand, and for beetles on the other”. On yet another, bacteria. Generally speaking though, I’d claim there is no falsifiable information contained in a statement like “this species is more evolved than that species”.
Then the onus is on the stained to perform excellently and demonstrate that the taboo is unwarranted. They’ll be discriminated against at first, as is always the case of those violating a taboo - which’ll mar people’s perceptions of their behaviour. Then eventually they’ll come to be accepted. Of course, taboos about behaviour integral to personality are more important to overcome.
It’s possible that the OP has dyspraxia, which causes difficulties with carrying out sequential tasks such as doing the laundry.
It’s more likely he suffers from cerebrum rectumitis.
Suffers hell, He revels in it!
Oh yeah?
Bwhaaaa!
That post you quoted reads like a William Shatner parody.
Dog carcass in alley this morning, tire tread on burst stomach. This city is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of blood and when the drains finally scab over, all the vermin will drown. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout “Save us!”… and I’ll look down and whisper “No.”
Mmm…sex and murder foam!
…still brandishing the SDMB Elitist Flagpole, pushes spotted-shirt-clad Wolfman into the foaming, shouting gutterish mayhem of the whores and politicians …
I’ll have you know I am a very sincere douche-bag.
That makes me want to howl. Ginsberg, is that you, reincarnated?
Nah, but it might be another expert on ink stains.
“I have seen the greatest
hypocritical douchebag minds
of my generation…”
graffiti in restroom,
city lights bookstore
As I’m not really composing, so much as typing as I would speak, I use more commas. It helps to accurately reflect the cadence of my speech, more than anything else.
A thousand pardons should they offend your eyes.
But any objection is an editorial choice at best, to my mind. And I often read posts that could benefit from a well placed comma.
As you apparently understood what I was saying, I’ll go ahead and count it a success anyway! But thanks for the editorial commentary, I’ll take it under advisement!
Seems like it’s always the negative, never the positive that’s accentuated. I mean Christ, talk about a clean fucking pen.
Um, ok, but I think you missed the point, which is you took a dig at somebody’s grammar while completely screwing up your own.
That is, unless you were going for some kind of 19th century style comma revival.
So, Dallas Jones was right.
Think ink blots.