My my my. Far right alt right Trumpista neo nazi fascist troll shit heads are crying about “civility” now.
And insults.
And shit.
They can all go back to 4chan, 8chan, or Stormfront. GTFO.
So you whine about not being able to be a racist scumbag but it’s okay for your ilk to murder people with a vehicle based on anything at all.
Right-wing is an ethnicity?
Is Sartre on your Ignore List?
Mind posting your 23 and me results? I need to know if you are more gorilla or cunt.
For such a delicate flower you sure like to pick fights. But when you’ve got mod armor to hide behind why not?
Well I guess now that Scumpup’s gone someone else just *has *to become the new Special Kind Of Asshole.
So it’s a “delicate flower” to expect you “rah rah support the troops” types not to be hypocritical assholes when confronted with an actual soldier who was injured in one of your Republican wars?
Assholes like you are why so many young men fear to report they have PTSD, because you scumbags think taunting a soldier about PTSD is “delicate flower”.
You okay with that, asshole? You’re endorsing attacking a soldier for having PTSD? Just like you endorsed running over anybody who you label “antifa”?
You don’t even have the guts to be honest. You need a truck to go up against an unarmed dude with a stick. You’d need a fucking RPG to try and take me on.
Cordially hoping you get treated exactly as you’ve treated others.
Watch your fucking language.
Also, for someone who advocates violence against people that annoy them, you sure like to act like a little troll.
Bless your heart!
It must be rough being too dumb to read clearly written language saying political violence has no place in the USA. Honesty isn’t your forte though is it?
Dishonest and stupid? Sad.
Oh, so you DIDN’T celebrate the “consequencing” of someone that blocked a vehicle for a whole two seconds?
Because most people, obviously not cowardly little pricks like yourself, find two whole seconds of waiting to be an annoyance, not terrorism.
Thank you for showing, yet again, how conservatives treat our veterans. I’d say it’s been enlightening, but, ya know, Trump won. So we already knew about the pieces of shit claiming to be “conservative”.
“Clearly written language”? Get enough balls to own your shit, then we’ll talk. You’ve been drooling over the idea of “consequencing” a pedestrian with a 2-ton truck all over this thread, just because some other Reichwinger claimed he was antifa and another shrieked he might have a gun.
And I’ll reiterate my earlier comment so your cowardly, dissembling, whiny, weak, ass can’t escape.
You called me a delicate flower for objecting to being taunted over PTSD, when you knew I was a soldier.
Guys like you are why so many younger soldiers are afraid to come forward when they start experiencing symptoms.
Your whole contribution to this thread is whining about why you can’t be expected NOT to use hate language because it’s too much trouble to just NOT use hate language, while at the same time you want to run over anybody you falsely accuse of being antifa. Note: being antifa is STILL not an excuse to run people over, you tiny little excuse for a man.
On top of that you lie about what you and others have said, for example using “consequencing” as a substitute for “running over a pedestrian.”
And you keep trying to evade responsibility for your words by employing idiotic substitutes like that “alternate-facts”-esque “consequencing” or just repeatedly refusing to address peoples’ actual words and points.
Enough of the hyperbole and false virtue signaling. It’s unbecoming.
My issue is the taking shelter behind asymmetric rules.
I’ve thanked you for your service and your sacrifice. I’ve acknowledged that your bravery is more than mine. I’ve said knowing what I know I wouldn’t make the comments that shodan made. That’s irrelevant to my disdain for those who want to throw rocks but can’t take rocks back.
Yeah, no. Not even close. Address, for starters, how a civilian attacking me (and letting other vets observing know how you’ll treat them) for having PTSD from combat is equal to being a “delicate flower”. No evasions. No “Blah blah blah that’s awful BUT…” You flat out dismissed my comments on sexism.
You Republicans do not get to claim you thanked me for my service when you then call me A DELICATE FLOWER.
“Primate” is EXACTLY the same kind of insult “psych ward” or “primate” is. It is EXACTLY the kind of evasion “consequenced” is. You want credit for the bullshit you didn’t mean that you then negated with your “but…”
No wonder you get so excited about running over a pedestrian with a 4,000-lb truck. It takes that much weighting the scales on your side before you’re anything close to the level of just barely not gutless.
The language you choose so consistently excuses evil conservative male actions while inventing imaginary offenses committed by people you don’t even know are liberal that you cannot claim it’s accidental. The law of averages dictates a roughly even split.
I can say what I want.
Your different behaviors and actions deserve different comments.
Being a productive and brave member of society gets praise.
Crying about allowable behavior until a critical mass causes precedent to be ignored deserves criticism.
I do see what you and others are saying but it is the pit and the rules and clarifications are written in plain English that anyone can read.
Male and female has nothing to do with any of that or any of this.
Now please try for a little more honesty and a little less of what it is that your doing. 
Stopped reading books by philosophers in 1978, IIRC. I’ll cop to being a dilettante wrt the field.
Waitaminute, is there a Doper with that handle?
AND AGAIN: You don’t get to claim you “thank” me for my service AND THEN CALL ME A DELICATE FLOWER.
You’re the one whining about what you call “double standarda” when people object to you either lying outright or inventing shit, while people QUOTE YOU and you don’t like it. You refuse to answer uncomfortable questions because to answer honestly would expose what pustular rash you are.
People are quoting you, when you are lying about them, your actions, and your comments. Those are not the same things.
I’m typing this extra slow for you. You are lying when you claim that I advocate political violence. Clearing the roads of foolish fools is not political violence. Furthermore, predicting violence will escalate if violence is advocated is NOT encouraging violence. Not trying to be mean, but is English your first language?
You know that adults can have different feelings about different actions from the same person. It’s not difficult. For example, Ronald McDonald makes a good caramel sundae. Yet I can still be quite upset, quite upset I say!, when the damn ice cream machine is out of order.
You say it’s false. I say I wouldn’t hit a pedestrian with my car because he stood in front of me for a couple seconds, then “consequence” him when he retaliated in kind.
I know back in the day [it was 1982] at about 0200 I was rolling to a red light in a not so good part of town when a few guys came into the road [probably to harass me in some way] so I didn’t even bother stopping, I just went through the red light. I have always preferred avoiding issues.
I think doing a very slow roll along the legal road making the people blocking move or serious aggress [allowing me to be more directly defensive, they have got to make the first violent move for it to be defensive. SImply blocking the road is not an act of violence, and a slow roll allows them to back off without a fight.]