I heard that, will it really be true?
It started off as a pilot for a reality series and spiraled into this.
In the David Spade interview, the reality show producer said he had to go into therapy and actually spent a week in an inpatient mental health facility after he left the project, because he had such serious PTSD as a result.
Yeah, I don’t think he made all of his money legally. It would be interesting to see what all businesses he had and what his life was like before he disappeared.
What I don’t get is why did so many people hate Carole Baskin? I see all these memes about Carole Baskin hate.
Yeah she killed her husband, and yeah she was a hypocrite who criticized other people for keeping cats in cages when she did the same thing. And she is a multi millionaire who relies on slave labor while criticizing other people who do the same.
But every major character in this film was deeply fucked up. Joe Exotic was far and away the worst to me. The guy struck me as a narcissist, they even mentioned how he pretty much robbed his parents due to the lawsuits he brought on himself with his behavior with Baskin.
Well he is a doctor of mysticism.
I got the impression from the show he got 19% in the general election for governor, which horrified me. Actually, he came in third in the Libertarian primary with 19% of the vote (which is still pretty shocking, even if it only amounted to 664 total votes), and never reached the general election.
:dubious:
Yeah, I was going to post the same thing. Why do people hate Carole Baskin? Sure she did twenty bajillion evil and horrendous things, but Hitler did just as bad or worse so why the hate? ![]()
I’ll add that she used the money from her husband that she murdered to pursue Joe in a way that none of us would be financially able to do just as a jab to him knowing that she would never be able to collect, yet attempted to collect anyways. Tort lawyers around here call that “blood money” and as a gentleman’s (or gentlelady’s) agreement, never take those cases, but only go after insurance companies, except in the most extreme cases.
Joe was rightfully outraged by this, but he handled it in the single most irresponsible and reckless way possible. I saw that his father was alive. My father would have beat my ass if I had done that. No matter that I was an adult, he would have beat my ass if I acted that way. Where was his Dad in all of this?
I just saw the first episode last nigh and the one thing I couldn’t stop thinking was, where are the experts? The show seems to take place in an intellectual dead zone, with nobody involved on any side having any formal training in zoology, biology or veterinary science. All I see there is a bunch of amateurs, bumbling about without the slightest idea what they’re doing. I find this mind-boggling.
And the thing is, the documentations themselves don’t bring in any academics, either! I mean, I get it - if someone who actually knew something were to say what these bozos were doing right or wrong, it would take away much of the drama, but still, it all comes across as a terminal case of anti-intellectualism.
Only if you think the documentary is about the big cats.
But it’s not really. It’s a series of character studies about truly terrible people and how they function. The background - in this case - happens to be about small independent zoos with big cats.
But what we’re watching is how terrible people are and how they behave. The background could have been caverns or roadside attractions or small restaurants in mid-sized cities.
But the cats are what I care about!
Putting the filmmakers’ intentions aside, I just find it striking how little formal education anyone there has. Running a zoo or fashioning yourself an “animal rights activist” without any sort of training or licensing seems absurd to me, like being an unlicensed airline pilot or surgeon. Hell, all the farmers I know have degrees in agriculture, and they’re not raising exotic animals! If the show were about sideshow operators or restaurateurs, I wouldn’t be thinking, 5 minutes in, that none of these people should be doing what they’re doing - even if they weren’t terrible people.
He got 19% in the libertarian primary for governor but that was only 664 votes. He did not make the libertarian runoff so he was not on the ballot in the general election.
I don’t see any evidence he was on any ballot for president in 2016.
Probably made no ballot but he did file and announce in Ohio??? for some reason.
Links to his Presidential filing and run for governor back in post #58. They show up under older articles.
Yeah, the show was very deceptive on that point as it made it seem that Joe got 19% in a three way general election race, not that he got 19% in a third party primary with only 600 votes.
I have no cite, but I read somewhere where he made the presidential ballot in Colorado.
Joe was by far the biggest piece of shit in the series. Guy was a typical narcissist who only cared about fame and money and fucked over everyone he came into contact with.
Rick Kirkham basically said Joe burned down all the film and audio that Rick recorded since Rick informed him that he owned the rights to all the video. There was video of Joe killing animals and laughing about it, etc. that Joe didn’t want to get out.
[quote=“Wesley_Clark, post:94, topic:849966”]
Joe was by far the biggest piece of shit in the series. Guy was a typical narcissist who only cared about fame and money and fucked over everyone he came into contact with.
Rick Kirkham basically said Joe burned down all the film and audio that Rick recorded since Rick informed him that he owned the rights to all the video. There was video of Joe killing animals and laughing about it, etc. that Joe didn’t want to get out.
[/QUOTE]I know. You’re right. I have no justification at all for what I said. No cites, no anything. But I just got the feeling that deep, deep, deep, and I mean all the way down, that Joe was a decent guy. I think many people felt that way or else they wouldn’t be posting all of these memes.
I think it may be from the one clip of him from years ago. He was running the zoo as a sanctuary and seemed to be against breeding and everything he later became. It seems like it was the money that was the problem. It’s insanely expensive to maintain the animals, which leads to needing more revenue streams, which leads to breeding more animals which leads to more expense, which leads to gaining some fame, which leads to Carole Baskin. He was on a roller coaster he couldn’t control and always seemed to be one inch away from unraveling completely.
I like how the missing husband’s will (found by the wife) starts off with “Upon my disappearance…”. Like he knew he was going to “disappear,” not “die”.
The only plausible story that doesn’t lead to her offing him is that he had a very large amount of money in off shore accounts or something and he fucked off to Latin America to live comfortably. But she probably killed him.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that it is illegal to sell or buy a tiger in the United States. It is also illegal to kill a tiger under federal law because they are an endangered species. However, it remains legal for guys like Joe to continue to breed tigers and show them off as cute little pets to zoo visitors. However the law that Carole Baskin and her group was trying to enact would prohibit any private person from owning a tiger? Wouldn’t that outlaw all zoos which contain tigers or could local municipalities or states have zoos with tigers?
So, if I am correct, the ownership of tigers is pretty much grandfathered in, in that if you don’t already own tigers and can breed new ones, you cannot own one in the future.
If all of this is true, then you can hardly blame guys like Joe for breeding them. It’s either breed them now or come to a point where you can never own one in the future.
ETA: Could Carole Baskin keep her tigers under the proposed law? I guess my main point is: what is the bitch about people owning and breeding tigers so long as safety and anti-cruelty laws are followed?