Two aspects of Lekatt (and therefore another two dimensions to “lekatting”) that haven’t been discussed yet are
1/ his penchant for flatly contradicting himself
2/ his habit (when being asked for cites) of stating that he’s already given them when he hasn’t, or giving a link to a site and insisting it supports his position when it does not.
If you’ll permit me these extensions to the definition of lekatting, fine examples of the technique can be found displayed by peter morris in the above thread.
[QUOTE=blanx]
We really need to stop feeding this nutjob- he’s useless, and should be locked in a small box.
[/QUOTE]
If we keep feeding him, he stays here and spends time trying to convince people who know hes a whackjob about his POV. If we let him wander off…he might find someone who believes him.
:eek:
Then more innocent lives will be forever steeped in ignorance.
[QUOTE=Sapo]
before this zombie is locked, I find it very curious that a pitting includes so many guests.
[/QUOTE]
They may not have been guests when they posted (over four years ago). Many may have simply not renewed their memberships and become guests.