Can you please respond to the issues in both emails to you?
Or else let SDMB provide a board where users can have civil UNLOCKED, UNINTERRUPTED dialogue with moderators, without each one jumping down the others’ throat and misjudging them.
Without vendetta’s, without cross-purpose communication.
I say this, why?
I was reading the post on GQ about Lieberman and endless repetitive BORING politics.
This led me to post the speculation about telepathy vs. speech (as an antidote to boredom).
So what happens? There’s a bug in the SDMB script; it didn’t allow for quotes. Therefore, I posted the MANNY post, and that in turn had a domino effect, where people warned me that it’s bad policy etc. etc. and when I finally wanted to respond to UncleBeer that “no” I didn’t take his response as criticism:
So what happens? I find that Manny locked the post. So then I wanted to private mail UncleBeer, but I know that SDMB doesn’t offer the PM feature. So I post another post addressed to UncleBeer. Whereupon again, somebody tells me “you could have emailed him” whereupon I respond that he better belive I would have sent a Private Message if SDMB would have offered it.
So what happens? I get a strong warning from Manny.
AND ALL BECAUSE OF THE ORIGINAL BUG, WHICH, BTW, WAS NOT INCLUDED IN FAQ.
But what Manny doesn’t know, is that I have DOUBLE frustration why? I have freenet, and today it was EXTREMELY slow, and “to boot” I often get booted off.
So, Manny, how’d you like to be in “my boots”? (forgive the pun)
And, Manny, are you on a vendetta? Do you for some reason think I’m a troublemaker? Or does SDMB in general have a policy of discrimination against right brained people? Do the moderators of SDMB enjoy keeping SDMB as a predominantly left-brained club?
Don’t get me wrong. I truly appreciate the generosity of left-brained people in providing needed facts. But I still get the feeling that anyone who doesn’t fit the “preferred mold” is discriminated against on SDMB. I don’t think this is an inaccurate assessment.