Um yeah, David42 is really obsessed with procreative aspects of marriage and trumpets the ‘heterosexual accidental pregnancy argument’ as justification to exclude same sex couples from marriage. Cause yanno, the problem is not the accidental/unintended pregnancy. Nope, it’s that heterosexuals who will inevitably suffer an accidental pregnancy (despite comprehensive sex education, contraceptives, abortion or adoption alternatives) will not marry because same sex marriage severs procreation from marriage. Yes, ‘responsible procreation’ is a shot-gun wedding - not preventing the ‘oopsie’ to begin with and planning your children to ensure they are born into stable emotional and financial environments.
After reading that nonsense in the “Predict how the Supreme Court will Decide the Same Sex Marriage Cases” thread, I decided to do a search on David42’s posts before responding and found this little gem.
He goes on to post that equating same sex relationships with heterosexuals is essentially saying “the shit on your dick is the equivalent of my son.”
Aside from his disgusting homophobic rhetoric; apparently, if you have sex without intending to procreate you are “mocking the creation of life in marriage.”
Back to the “Predict how the Supreme Court will Decide the Same Sex Marriage Cases” thread:
Huh? Delusional. Societal duty to marry? And he keeps tooting his horn about this Jones and Bricker thread, where apparently SCOTUS used his same argument in their ruling. Seriously dude, join MENSA or something. Going on and on about that makes you look pathetic.
It is quite obvious what a vile creature David42 is and engaging with him in an attempt to ‘fight his ignorance’ is futile.
I’m not so sure since he claims to have two casual girlfriends (one of which is bisexual). I think he really needs to go back to law school since dropping out has driven him to extreme lengths and delusion in order to prove his “intellect”.
It sounded to me that he was in law school for a while. Anyone know if he flunked out, was kicked out for being an asshole, or if the storefront closed?
I kind of believe him about the girlfriend. Anyone dating this guy must have the IQ of a turnip, so no wonder she is impressed. “Marrying involves children sometimes? Who knew?”
He also, if he’s to be believed, seems to be upset about people not being prosecuted for adultery and for women divorcing men who beat them.
He complained about how gay marriage was diminishing “the dignity of marriage”. I sarcastically added that marriage’s dignity was already destroyed when they allowed blacks and whites to intermarry to which he claimed:
I may not be Mr. Super Awesome Para-Illegal but I can fight a court case like nobodys’ business and as soon as I get out of jail for contempt of court I’ll show you all how good I am at law things.
Hmm, in David42’s ‘frothy mixture’ posts, he claims to have a child - a son. Yet, now he has two casual girlfriends, so apparently he is not married to the mother of his child (if one actually exists) or is committing adultery (something he thinks should be prosecuted). Interesting circumstances for someone against no fault divorce, who foams at the mouth over ‘responsible procreation’ and the ‘societal duty to marry’…
I think it’s partially the erratic shift in person that makes it baffling. Here, I’ll fix it.
She weeps over her abortion at 17 years old and says, “I have done what no man even gave me a hint needed doing before.”
Here’s a crazy theory: his wife left him because he beat her, and that’s why he keeps raving about how wrong it is that liberals turn every little instance of violence into a crisis that breaks up a family.
To be more than fair, if you procreated with David42, wouldn’t you eventually sober up, get the divorce (and restraining order), and ignore his entreaties that you are violating the natural order by divorcing him?
I dunno off the top of my head. Certainly it would hurt – might even hurt your chances of getting into (an ABA-approved) law school or registering for the Bar Exam. Depending on the state. For all I know, in Alaska (which has no ABA-approved law schools at all) they’re hungry enough for lawyers to overlook certain things.
So he’s been to law school, worked as a paralegal for 12 years, did his unlicensed law work for 2 more years and now runs a book store. He has(had) a wife and son.
So he’s a guy in his mid 30’s (at least) dating a bisexual 19 y.o.
And he thinks homosexuals are fucked up :smack:
Didn’t you get the (straight guy) bigot memo? Gay men are gross. Lesbians are invisible or nasty or just need a good fucking. Young, attractive women who proclaim to be bisexual are HOT.