not clever and dull? hmm…
Well, maybe the problem is you and Monty and whomever rather spend your time correcting people about what they don’t understand about religious labels and categories than deal with how bizarre it is for one of your leaders to denounce the game of chess.
Yes not clever, dull, actually stupid. the picture of a stupid person who thinks he is clever like your clumsy, boring and idiot interventions in the Jesus discussion…
Since I am not Saudi this person is not one of “my” leaders. I leave it to the Ibn Saud monarchy to explain why it continues to pay these people and promote them.
There is nothing for Monty, a Mormon or myself, not saudi, not salafi, to “deal with” other than idiot bigots who continue to promote hatred and the blaming of broad groups.
well, as far as I can tell your activity on this thread has been:
1- to call the grand mufasa dude in Saudi Arabia an idiot
2- to call any non religious person who agrees with you a racist bigoted asshole
do you not see some inherent contradiction between 1 & 2
I have no idea of the religious or not views of the bigot asshole OP. his bigotry stands on its own as** ñañi **has highlighted already.
Since it asserts things not known based on your bizarre belief system and poor intelligence reading of things not there, no there is no contradiction between the two. in fact there is not any logical relation between the dismissing of a stupid opinion by a stupid Saudi official and the stupid bigotry of the OP.
But it is super for showing us how stupid you are and what a strange distorted logic you have…
For the record the “Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia” is a completely powerless position (it probably does have influence though).
The position was abolished back in the 1960’s by King Faisal and its role subsumed into the Ministry of Justice; the title was restored back in 1993, shorn of its previous powers.
Its also a political sinecure and damn near heredity; all the holders bar one have been from a single family.
In short for a U.S example, its more akin to a statement on constitutional law from a law Professor at a major law school, not like an Act of Congress or a Supreme Court decision.
But you seem even more bothered/mad today than normal.
I’m not faulting you, I get mad and bothered too.
I don’t see how religion is doing you any benefit.
This thread is a perfect example of why I dislike religion.
It drives people apart, not together.
As long as there is religion there will be an in group out group dynamic.
who cares what you see or not? You are an idiot who thinks himself clever and smart.
this thread is a perfect example of your clumsy proselytizing of your own religious like beliefs and example of how stupid you are.
As long as there are humans there will be in-group / out-group dynamics. The physical signs of religious belief are as old as the signs of the intelligence in the human ancestors. It is an irrational superstitious belief to think in-group/out-group are something particular to religion.
Religion adds another level to it.
Et voila, the religious belief in the non-religion. It is funny how deep and how blind.
Oh really?
What exactly is it that I’m bling too?
oops!!!
blind too 
For someone who likes calling others stupid, you sure do make some stupid mistakes.
lol
i just caught this joke…
Oh terrible, I mistyped when typing in my fourth language. A typo is so much the same as being stupid.
Whoever. If you’re going to try to show how smart you are, try to use the correct case of the pronoun.
Next: coremelt asserted that Islamic scholars are functioning as priests. The fact is they are not.
Finally: Since I’m LDS, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia is certainly not one of my leaders.
Making a stupid mistake doesn’t make you stupid. Similarly, not being stupid doesn’t insulate you from making stupid mistakes.
This is also a stupid mistake: Someone’s antipathy towards religion doesn’t mean they have a “religious belief in the non-religion”, or however you’d phrase that in idiomatic English. It’s entirely possible to function without any form of unquestioned dogma, even if you dislike religion.
LDS?
is hostility one of their core teachings? or, did you add that part yourself?
No it is not a “mistake” of any kind it is a judgement about the silly person from observing his very stupid interactions and religious type dogmatism about all things religious across many threads…
So besides complaining about typos and raising irrelevant observations, what?
Nothing hostile hear. Well, nothing other than a dislike of stupidity.
I’m not sure if you realize this but pointing out my hostility towards religion is not going to get you anywhere.
If there was any solid, real, validity to any of you peoples beliefs about god, you wouldn’t have to waste your time getting mad at me.
It’s the weakness of your position that makes you attack those who attack your position.