toward being a free man on the land

[Inner_Stickler]

I don’t know about Australia, but FMOTL is a designation often used by british people while people in the united states will call themselves sovereign citizens. I don’t remember which way Canada tends to fall.

[Smapti]

@marcmcroy

And yes I did go to public schools but they were a state run agency then the federal government did not legislate curruculum.

So what you’re saying is that the federal government is an unholy dictatorship which uses magic words to enslave you by creating an imaginary person, but that the state government is a wholly legitimate entity whose laws are just and valid?

Please proceed, governor.

[marcmcroy]

@Saint_Cad

1. Gasoline tax alone does not pay for the building and maintainance of the road.
2. I did look it up. Interest on the debt is less than 6.1% of the US spending.
3. So you received the benefits of a free public education? Why didn’t that enter you into a contract with the state?
4. Does the Sheriff’s office provide you with safety and protection of you and your land?

So in short, if you want to be a Freeman of the land are you prepared to do one of two things:

1. Give up ALL benefits of being a US citizen include access to anything off of your property such as public roads.
   or
2. Pay the true cost of the benefits you use which I can guaranty is more than you pay in taxes. You can start by reimbursing your state for the cost of your education.

6% of spending not income
Entered into state contract not federal and yes my parents paid state taxes that included public education so it was paid in full
Sheriffs are state agency not federal.
US citizen and state citizen are two different entities.

[marcmcroy]

@Smapti

So what you’re saying is that the federal government is an unholy dictatorship which uses magic words to enslave you by creating an imaginary person, but that the state government is a wholly legitimate entity whose laws are just and valid?

Please proceed, governor.

yea I like the way you think…

[Czarcasm]

@marcmcroy

yea I like the way you think…

What about the questions you are avoiding from post #218?

[Caffeine.addict]

Maybe I missed this earlier, but what is so magical and desirable about the common law? What are you defining as common law? Why is it better than laws created by the legislature?

[Fear_Itself]

@marcmcroy

6% of spending not income

so what? You are still wrong about taxes all going toward paying interest on the debt. So just admit you were wrong.

[BrainGlutton]

@marcmcroy

Fasten the seat belts even gravity is suspect. Here
Everything is not as it seems.

That’s about gravity’s nature and mechanisms, not its existence.

[running_coach]

@marcmcroy

US citizen and state citizen are two different entities.

Explain, please.

[marcmcroy]

@Fear_Itself

so what? You are still wrong about taxes all going toward paying interest on the debt. So just admit you were wrong.

No I’m not HERE

[Czarcasm]

@marcmcroy

No I’m not HERE

Then where the hell are you, and when are you going to answer my questions from post #218?

[Hentor_the_Barbarian]

Fucking punctuation marks! How do they work?

[CannyDan]

@marcmcroy

No I’m not HERE

Your cite cites a report from 1984.
1984!!!
C’mon, sheeple, don’t you see now?!?!?!

[running_coach]

@Hentor_the_Barbarian

Fucking punctuation marks! How do they work?

He didn’t consent to be punctuated.

[Robot_Arm]

@Gorsnak

And even if he did, God’s laws are impotent.

@Learjeff

Well, they could be the laws of physics. I haven’t managed to break any of those, recently.

Fortunately, His speed limit is fairly generous.

[BrainGlutton]

@marcmcroy

US citizen and state citizen are two different entities.

No, they’re not. 14th Amendment.

[marcmcroy]

@CannyDan

Your cite cites a report from 1984.
1984!!!
C’mon, sheeple, don’t you see now?!?!?!

the article was updated 2012 and yes there is a quote from 1984. Do you think we are spending less now.. C’mon Mate..really?

[marcmcroy]

@BrainGlutton

No, they’re not. 14th Amendment.

ah… the usurping dogma.Can it be questioned? One Judge thinks so

[Running_with_Scissors]

@marcmcroy

No I’m not HERE

An anti-income-taxer, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, and a birther, all in one. There’s someone I want to get reliable information from…
</sarcasm>

[Czarcasm]

@marcmcroy

ah… the usurping dogma.Can it be questioned? One Judge thinks so

What sort of cites from the opposing posters will you accept as valid? Anything from the federal government? When it comes to what percentage of the roads the gas tax pays for, which you demanded a cite for, what is acceptable?