I’m not attacking what anybody thinks they are. I think it’s silly and taken to an extreme, but i’m not attacking it.
What I am attacking is the reiterated belief that the transgendered person is under no moral or ethical obligation to reveal to their partners the fact that they are not what they seem to be. That is dishonest and despicable. Misrepresenting your financial status or job in order to score a girl who wouldn’t be interested otherwise is one thing (and bad - I’m not condoning it), but misrepresenting your sex is an entirely different level of deception. And no, I don’t think it should be revealed on the first date. I think it should be revealed before things ever progress as far as a date. Regardless of how unenlightened and uncool straight dope considers it, I would not go on a date or enter into any even remotely romantic situation with a man - even one who looks like a woman… And if I were fooled into doing so, I would be extremely angry. Even if it just meant staring into each other’s eyes or a peck on the cheek. Some people don’t shape their morality based on public perception.
Regarding self image, as I said above I’m not attacking the concept itself. But, let me make an analogy:
My self-image is something like this: I think of myself as having a sort of GQ-ish face (the magazine, not the forum), a solid, strong, athletic body, and unbeatable fighting skills.
Then I see a mirror, and the man I see looking back at me is not at all how I see myself: An average-looking face, slightly pale body that is about 10 pounds heavier and a bit less muscular than it should be, and somewhat less than deadly.
Now the dilemma is that the first description is my honest self-image. That’s how I see myself in my mind. But reality doesn’t bear it out. No matter how much I might believe that I’m an adonis trapped in an out-of-shape body, the fact is that I do not look like what I imagine myself as. The difference between me and KellyM is that I accept reality. If I believed I was a woman, no amount of wishing would make it so, and no amount of surgery would make it real, any more than wearing a muscle suit would make me a bodybuilder.
And regarding the “fight against ignorance” that everybody likes to invoke so often, see my last post. A woman cannot produce sperm or impregnate another woman, as KellyM has done. A woman does not have XY chromosomes. And a woman is not born with male plumbing. KellyM, et al, may believe that they are women, they may look like women, and they may have undergone surgery to make them appear to be women under all but the most thorough examinations, but they Are. Not. Women. That is not an attack. It is a fact.
And eve, don’t group me. And don’t make stupid hyperbole. I’m not interested in a lawsuit or trying to wipe anybody off the face of the earth, so quit acting like a drama queen. I don’t give a damn what you do to your body or who you involve in your love life. But be f-ing honest about it. It’s wrong to date a heterosexual man who is unaware of your situation, when you are yourself biologically a man. It is deceptive. It is fraudulent. I’m searching for the cite now, but the standard definition is having sex against the will of one of the participants. If a man drugs or gets a woman drunk to lower her resistance, it can be considered rape, depending on the circumstances. I’m pretty sure that posing as the opposite sex in order to accomplish sex fraudulently is the same type of situation. Sex with a man is against my will. If I were fooled into it by a cleve surgeon, I would feel violated and angry. That is rape, whether it meets the legal definition or not.
Yeah, I’m well aware. But we’re not talking about XXY people, are we? We’re talking about men who want to be women, and women who want to be men. And as for definitions, I don’t know. Does the reproductive system work? Is the person capable of giving birth or causing a pregnancy? If so, there’s your answer. Whichever set of pipes works is what you are. If neither, then a) I really don’t know, and b) it’s not what we’re talking about.