I figure that 50 years is a reasonable statute of limitations for something like that.
This troll is also incredibly bad at constructing thread titles. I mean, “If I put ‘IF’”. WTF? Before I saw that it was in ATMB, and who had posted it, I thought it was some moronic grammar question. And I still have no idea what actual point they were trying to make, if any. Perhaps that the Select Committee was stupid for making a criminal referral against Dear Leader?
Does this mean that conservatives are going to be whining about not seeing Hunter Biden’s penis in the year 2070?
Ah, I see your confusion you are using the word reasonable where reason doesn’t really exist.
Janus is clearly trolling now.
Or, I should say clearly trolling again.
I bow out.
ETA: I’ll also note that they clearly don’t want to continue posting on these boards.
Janus is clearly banned now.
I’ll bet his first name is “Hugh”.
Now he is Bannus
That one caught our attention a while ago but really ramped up the trolling in the last day. The last thread was pure trolling and he is gone.

I’ll bet his first name is “Hugh”.
Hah!!
Done. lets see what happens
It’s almost as if the term “FAFO” was invented for this situation.

A more interesting, but still not particularly interesting, question: why Jane Fonda in particular?
I don’t think that what prompted Sir Mix-a-Lot’s 1992 reference to “playin’ workout tapes by Fonda” in “Baby Got Back” was Jane Fonda’s Vietnam-era activism, but rather the stupendous commercial success of her 1980s workout videos.
You young’uns might not remember it, but Jane Fonda was basically THE face of the female fitness industry in the 1980s, regardless of any lingering “Hanoi Jane” resentments (which I doubt the 1963-born Seattleite rapper was particularly involved with anyway).
His next handle will undoubtedly be “Drectum”
I think that’s called projection, since it’s obvious that what conservatives are concerned with is not the imagery but the fact that tech companies, the media, and intelligence/law enforcement are in collusion to suppress factual information on false pretenses in order to manipulate an election outcome. It’s no surprise since that’s standard MO for leftists.
Suppress factual information? You needed to see Hunter’s dick pics to be certain he has one?
C’mon, DNFTT
Hey, Octo, I’m willing to kick your ass again in a debate, but I have better things to do than help you adjust to your latent desires to see Hunter Biden’s cock.
But! Those feelings? They’re OK man! We’ll still love you regardless of your desires! Sorry they were thwarted by Jack Dorsey!
Dammit, why can’t I listen to my own good advice?

Does this mean that conservatives are going to be whining about not seeing Hunter Biden’s penis in the year 2070?

I think that’s called projection, since it’s obvious that what conservatives are concerned with is not the imagery but the fact that tech companies, the media, and intelligence/law enforcement are in collusion to suppress factual information on false pretenses in order to manipulate an election outcome. It’s no surprise since that’s standard MO for leftists.
… yes. Yes they will, EP.
Jesus Christ octo, you sound like the biggest whiner. What sort of man talks like this? Drop the whining, face up to the fact that your policies are unpopular, stop blaming everyone else for your moral and intellectual failures, and be better than… :waves hands: … this.
It’s just cabin fever.