I’m not a witch…I’m not a witch!
Oh.
'Tis a fair cop.
Go pack!
Yay. I’m quite happy to be wrong.
Sweet. One more tough Day and we can do this.
That was awesome. Way to go Town!
So rethinking the current scenario, we will wake to three town and one scum. (Otherwise, I think the game would have ended in a scum if there were originally five scum or a town win if only three.)
This is a rules clarification question: what occurs in the event of a mis-lynch today and scum lynch tonight, leaving one scum and one town for a tie? Does it come down to the random lynch tiebreaker or is that a scum win?
In that particular scenario (assuming you are correct in all of your assumptions), it will end with a coin flip.
In a game which has a “no lynch” policy rather than a tiebreaker in instances of no clear majority vote, your above scenario would end with a wolf victory.
*For the first night in a very long time, we were able to relax. Buoyed by the death of the dreaded Alpha, we unearthed a bottle of spirits long kept for an ocassion of import and toasted the memories of our comrades - those killed by the fearsome claws of wolf and those by the misguided hands of man. Though we few remaining had no illusions of our own safety, we felt that, perhaps, our story was finally drawing to a close.
For yet another of our comrades, it drew close far too quickly, far too soon.*
Dante G, a** standard village citizen**, has been killed.
**
It is now Day 6. Our remaining players are, in most recent posting order:
HookerChemical
Dead Cat
Biotop
snfaulkner
READ THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT THING:
In the interest of time and maintaining momentum, I am going to enact a hammer rule. Day 6 will end as soon as any player has had three votes for 24 consecutive hours. If this does not happen, the day will end as scheduled: Friday at 11:00 AM EST.**
Hooker, how can you ask this question???
I spent a good portion of yesterDay anguishing over why a wolf would settle for a tie. The coinflip was clearly in the rules at the start of the game. Did you not read and think about my posts at all yesterDay? And if not, why not? My jaw just about hit the floor when I read your question last night.
Explain please.
+++++
Sorry, Dante. I gave you a hard time, but you stood up for yourself, and by yesterDay’s end I was fairly sure you were Town, even without Scum Plankton’s big reveal.
Rereading your posts yesterday, the possibility of a tie comes up breifly and wasn’t part of the posts I was focusing on. The rules are stated such that the last day would result in the coin toss. That result feels… anticlimactic, so I wanted clarification and confirmation that I was interpreting the rule correctly.
It does mean that the strictly going by probability odds are in our favor, given that we have a one three chance of the right lynch, one in three chance of winning the coin toss, and one three chance of losing to scum on the coin toss.
Hooker, apologies if I’m missing something but I don’t see how we can rule out there being 5 wolves at the start, although 4 seems much more likely (clearly there can’t have been only 3 otherwise we would have won yesterDay). It seems to be possible that we started yesterDay with 3 town and 3 scum. If so, we now have 2 town and 2 scum. That would make things very easy from my perspective, as I know I am town and that snf is town, so provided we both vote to lynch the same player, there’s not much more we can do other than hope we win the coinflip, then hope whoever survives wins the second coinflip.
However, I feel it is more likely that we have just one scum to find, which does tip the odds in our favour if so. It’s hardly a surprise Dante was killed, as the most experienced 100% confirmed town player remaining. snfaulkner, I’m sorry I kept on suspecting you but I’m glad I was swayed more towards any mistakes you made being due to inexperience rather than malice. Like you I find myself feeling my way through this game even more so than the experienced players.
I’ve never even read an endgame before, so I’m not sure whether it’s best to let confirmed town snf state his thoughts first, or whether I should just go ahead and post what I think. Screw it, it’s been a long game and I’m impatient so I’m just going to go with it.
Clearly Hooker, Biotop and me are all going to vote for each other in some permutation toDay. If we do in fact all vote for each other (one vote each), snf will effectively have the casting vote on who to lynch. If on the other hand two of us agrees to lynch the third, snf would have to be very convinced of someone else’s guilt to vote for them instead. Indeed, odds would suggest he probably shouldn’t (creating a tie - clearly in a 2 votes to 1 scenario, snf voting for the other player with no votes would be a bizarre choice).
On re-reading the thread last Night, I found something interesting - Hooker has only had one vote against him in the entire game (on Day Two), and even that didn’t stick, while Biotop has only had two votes against him in the entire game - once on Day One (later unvoted), and again on Day Three. Even more interestingly, all three of those votes were by known wolf Mahaloth. I haven’t counted how many votes I have had in the game (and votes in early Days mean a lot less than vote in later Days, I think) but it’s definitely more than two, though probably not much more. However, SP went after me pretty hard yesterDay which I would say enhances my town cred. Similarly, I went hard and early after SP and never wavered, I went hard and early after Mahaloth on Day Three and never wavered, and I went hard and early after Prof P on Day One (and unfortunately wavered at the end). While I appreciate my voting record earlier in the game could be called into question (as evidenced by SP’s attempt to frame me yesterDay), I just don’t think that stands up any more.
Now, naturally there is one good reason that neither Hooker nor Biotop have attracted many votes so far - they have both played very solid townie-looking games right from the start. But the fact remains from my perspective at least one of them is a wolf, who has played extremely well. As I indicated above, clearly I will vote for one of them toDay. I have re-read the thread in detail once already, and now really is the time when it is fair to assume scummy motives for each of their posts and see what might come out in the wash. But at the moment, I still can’t decide where my vote should go.
In conclusion then, I think (perhaps rather arrogantly) that of the three of us, I have the strongest townie credentials. That being the case, I can’t see whichever of you is town voting for me. If so, clearly that means you are obliged to vote for each other. Which gets us no further forward in itself, because snf and I will be faced with the same 50-50 choice. If one of you votes for me, maybe that will encourage the other one to vote for the other, in which case we may reach a sort of Mexican stand-off with no-one wanting to cast the first stone.
Shit - I’m out of ideas, so I think I’ll just have to wait and see what you guys make of it all.
Actually, thinking it through a bit further, I’ve just realised that if one of us townies gets voted for first, if my previous post holds up it could be easy for the wolf to create a mislynch by following that vote. On the other hand, is it suspicious to cast the first vote in an attempt to create that scenario? I just don’t know. It feels intuitively like there ought to be some sort of game theory solution to this, but I suppose there can’t be otherwise the game would be broken and people wouldn’t spend all this time playing it.
That being the case, I’m going to air my suspicions after all. At the moment I have to say they are with Biotop, on the basis that in the last couple of Days his analytical posts have rather dropped off, whereas Hooker has kept it up. I appreciate work schedules could be a genuine townie reason for this but on the other hand it might be a convenient cover. I also don’t like the fact that Biotop said we should ignore Mahaloth’s post-confession posts, I maintain that I don’t think that is necessarily correct. Finally, Biotop was late getting on the bandwagon with his votes for both Mahaloth and Suburban Plankton. In his favour is the fact that he maintained his vote on Prof P on Day One, but at that point Sario was all but confirmed as the lynch so this could have been a tactical move. My gut has been right a lot of the time so far, I think it has only let me down when others have played poorly. So:
VOTE Biotop
One more thing - if we are right about there being one wolf remaining, presumably the game ends at the end of toDay in any event, because we win on a correct lynch, and on a mislynch we are immediately into coinflip territory (because it will then be 2 town 1 wolf, and it doesn’t matter who the wolf kills) - i.e. there is no need to have another Night before deciding this thing once and for all. Unless we actually have 2 wolves. Hope not.
It’s possible that there were 3 town/3 scum yesterday. However, if that’s the case, scum grossly misplayed it by not voting as a block to lynch town. If it were 3 on 3, scum could only have lost if they never convinced a townie to break thier vote off from the other townies and lost three straight coin flips. The break in the townie block wouldn’t have to come to the scum block for them to win.
DeadCat, my job has been anything but “convenient.” I’m almost at the point of posting my work phone number and real name so that you guys could call the store and confirm my schedule with my boss. I have made no secret that the last week would be tough. I have generally posted late at night because that is when I get home, and I usually spend an hour or two with my wife before she goes to bed. My wife is also in the Grocery business as a Floral Manager at a different store than mine, and generally works much earlier in the day than I do.
+++++
Wow. We’ve been played. And I especially have been played.
I am now forced to choose between the two players I have trusted most of the game. On day 1 Professor Pepperwinkle tried to extend the hand of friendship, and I was rightly suspicious. Why should I trust anyone really? This is a game where people are trying to fool and manipulate? I thought I was so smart seeing through the Professor’s gesture. This is only my second Mafia game, but no wolf was going to fool me that easily!
But then someone found a way to do the same thing in a much more clever and insidious manner. This player acted all Townie while telling me how Townie I was. This player made a lot of helpful analysis. This player told me how great my analysis was. “Look how well I am doing in my second game,” I thought. Sigh. No pride now.
But I followed along like an idiot. Sorry Town, I forgot that no one should ever to be completely trusted in Mafia. Stupid newbie me.
Who is the final Scum player?
Is it DeadCat, who has been the “victim” of Scum Suburban Plankton’s suspicion case? Or is it Hooker, who posted the case against Mahaloth right after** TexCat** posted the same?
(Forgive me if I don’t waste your time with an “or is it me, blah blah blah…” It didn’t impress me in** DeadCat**’s analysis of the possible wolf pairings yesterDay, and it doesn’t impress me when Hooker constantly reminds us that he understands we have to consider his possible wolfdom too. Any player making a case of how they might be wolf is just so much chatter. And ultimately, it means just about as much as me simply declaring that I am Town. Instead of telling you that you need to consider my possible scumminess , which I know you of course are already doing, I will simply make my defense later in this post.)
Unless DeadCat and Suburban Plankton have been plotting a brilliant self-destructive end game, then the remaining wolf must be Hooker, it seems to me. I have spent all game defending Hooker, even after TexCat died saying we should lynch him. Why? Because even with a good case from TexCat, I couldn’t get beyond post #517. Hooker’s case against Mahaloth came just after TexCat’s. They were reading the same posts and coming to the same conclusions at the same time. How could that be if Hooker is Scum? They must both be Town.
But I see rather too late that this logic doesn’t necessarily follow. Of course they are reading the same posts, what other posts are there? And of course they are coming to the same conclusions, because those are the conclusions a reasonable Town person would reach. And they are also the same results that a Wolf who had previously voted for two Town players might come up with as well if he wanted to look Town. Wolf Hooker could easily make the same posts as Town Hooker. Why did it take me so long to see this? I should have lat least been a bit wary, especially since Hooker was the one who drew my attention to the timely similarity first. Texcat must have understood it, because she voted for Hooker after he made his post #517.
Hooker’s Post #517 is actually quite different than TexCat’s #516 though. TexCat’s case was a full-blown attack only on** Mahaloth**. Her case was to the point, well thought out and linked. Hooker’s post #517 voices lengthy suspicions on Dante G and snfaulkner as well, only finishing up with a case against** Mahaloth**. Hooker actually does not vote for** Mahaloth** in Post #517, but waits nine more minutes. I originally took this to mean that he read** TexCat**’s post and then realized Mahaloth must be scum. But maybe he realized that TexCat’s case was damning and now was the time to get credit for a wolf pelt or else be under the suspicion that would almost certainly come if he did not vote the right way.
Of course the suspicion on Hooker still came despite his post and Mahaloth’s confession. The suspicion came, in post#562 from** TexCat**. And like an idiot I let Hooker talk me out of believing her. I should have trusted the experienced player who was shown to be Town. Instead I let the accused player tell me what to think. Ugh.
TexCat’s second-to-last posting was to tell us to lynch Hooker. Her final posting was to say she thought Dante G was being set up. It looks like the **Dante G **setup is what happened after all. There’s the answer to Mystery #2. **Hooker **immediately voted for **Dante G **after the PCM night kill.
I kept wondering why Suburban Plankton was not making an active case for his innocence yesterDay. I think the reason is that they were setting **Hooker **up to be” certain” Town if SP, the likely lynch, was actually lynched. This also explains why Hooker did not find it odd yesterday that a wolf was voting for SP while still being “supportive” of me. His role must have been to be on the “confirmed” Town side if SP got lynched. Of course they might have thought there was some chance that DeadCat might actually fall under suspicion. It was Win/Win however the voting went.
And what are we to make of the question Hooker asked about the tie breaker last Night? If they really thought the Scum would automatically win by Hooker surviving until the last day with one other Town player, then that would certainly explain his vote on Suburban Plankton.
Hooker, why didn’t you ask about the tie-breaker if you were unclear when I was explicitly posting about it several times yesterDay? You say I only mentioned it once, but I either stated it directly or implied it heavily in Posts #663, #710, #727, #729 and #733. Were you not focused on any of those posts? It was also right there in the rules when we started the game. Were you not reading my posts at all yesterDay? And if not, why not? If you really did not understand the rules on the tie breaker, then I have my answer to Mystery #4. Why would a wolf vote for scum SP if the result would be at best a tie for them? Because the wolves somehow thought they would win with a tie. And Hooker, if you actually did understand the tie rule already, then the question is a fake one and only a wolf would have reason to ask a phony question.
Deadcat said yesterday he would vote for me if Suburban Plankton flipped Alpha. He has done so toDay. Deadcat, I all I have is my record. Which is thus:
Day 1: I voted for Scum Professor Pepperwinkle, and stuck with it when I could have easily voted for someone else. If I am Scum, why did I try and throw my fellow wolf under the bus on the first Day? I didn’t have a string of mislynches to my name at the time. I didn’t badly need Town cred. Hooker and** Astral** had both stated they didn’t see anything wrong with Prof. P’s postings. But I stuck with my vote and nearly got PP lynched. If I am Scum not only did I not make a vote on Sario for the mislynch, I actively worked to get PP lynched instead. None of us knew there was a vigilante. So why would I do that if Scum? I wouldn’t.
Day 2: I voted for WFTomba and made a strong case against him. When I voted for WFTomba (Post #427), the vote was already 6 votes for Tomba, and a smattering of one votes for a few others. If I am Scum, why would I do that? My vote was not going to change anything. Why would I not instead vote for another player so that I would look good the next day for not having supported the mislynch? If I was Scum, the worst thing I could do would be to make a strong case against the player I knew was a mislynch when my case and post would not matter to the outcome in any way. Why would I do that if Scum? I wouldn’t.
Day 3: Scum Mahaloth begins the Day by jumping all over me for PIS. This is the second time he has voted for me. If I am Scum… (and because** Mahaloth** is now known to have been scum)…why would Mahaloth do that? If I am Scum then I am throwing** Professor Pepperwinkle under the bus and Scum Mahaloth would be trying to do the same thing to me. There’s bussing of course, but the theory where we are all Scum attacking each other makes this theoretical wolf team so dysfunctional they should be on Jerry Springer, not playing together a game of Mafia. I did not weigh in at the time that all the postings were going on against Mahaloth because I had taken a promised Day off from the game with my wife. We visited Richmond. When I got up the next morning before work I skimmed the thread and noted that Mahaloth** was not trying very hard to defend himself. When I checked back in at lunch at work that Thursday, I found that Mahaloth had already confessed. I have no defense other than “not being around to get in a vote” before Mahaloth made his confession. I wasn’t there. I have a job and a family. Inconvenient for me, but the truth. And my job does not allow me to work on a computer with outside internet access. I only have my phone, which I can check surreptitiously in the accounting office (or rest room) or legally at lunch.
(BTW DeadCat, I believe you are not American and may not understand the absolutely holy hell that happens at the Grocery Store on Thanksgiving week in the USA. But other players from this country will understand only too well. DeadCat, please google it and you will see I am not making this up. It’s worse than Christmas.)
Note that Scum Suburban Plankton gives me grief in post #537 for being too Pro-Town. Why would he undercut me if the wolves were trying so hard to make Scum** Biotop** look Town? Imagine me, **Suburban Plankton **and Mahaloth as a Scum team on Day 3. Why would we interact like that? We wouldn’t.
Day 4: I listed my suspicions of IRConfused and Octarine for lurking before IRConfused came out and said that he was Cop. Please note that I also voiced less suspicion on IRConfused and more on Octarine (Post #608). I said I thought Octarine was Scum. I had no way of knowing that IRConfused was the Cop when I reduced my suspicion on him. I simply noted that he had picked a particularly damaging post to attack** Mahaloth** on, so if they were both Scum then that was odd. Then hero **IRConfused **comes in with the news that he is Cop. My initial reaction is to join the other posters and lynch Suburban Plankton, but I unfortunately made the mistake of switching to Octarine. But I will argue it is only a mistake in hindsight. I read the “Play Mafia Better” thread several times. We have to punish lurkers by lynching them if the vote is tight. Hooker, who made the case against **Suburban Plankton **certainly left the opening by claiming his case was “weak.” I was also irked at Octarine a bit for not posting considering how much effort some of us were putting into the game. If the same situation were to arise again in another game, I think I would do the same thing. Lynching Octarine was the right decision in theory, even if the results in practice led to a mislynch. Others seemed to agree with me at the time. DeadCat, you even said Octarine lynched himself.
Day 5: I think the questions I asked were valid. How could I just go add my name to a lynch line that included everyone else? I struggled with this and went back and forth. I tried to get Dante and** snfaulkner** to post to explain what was going on. I voted for Suburban Plankton out of frustration because I couldn’t figure out what was going on. I was sure the Alpha had been investigated. But it all made no sense.
But now I think I see clearly. SPlankton was likely destined to go down, and one of the players I trusted was Scum leading the charge, and thus making himself look very good in the process. I don’t think that player is DeadCat. I think it is HookerChemical.
I have tried all game to lay out my thoughts as open as I could. I never worried much whether I looked like Scum doing so. I ask the other Town players to look at my record in total. I have made mistakes. But I think my mistakes over the past two Days have very good explanations and are mistakes I believe any thinking Town player might make. My mistakes certainly came at the wrong time and I am sorry about that. But my record is much more than these mistakes and I stand behind it all.
I hope I am not lynched toDay. I am not asking you to believe me that I am Town. I am asking you to look at my total record. Does it make any sense at all for me to be wolf? Then please look at Hooker and ask the same.
And Hooker, if you are Town, then convince me that** DeadCat** is the wolf. ‘Cause right now I just don’t see it.
If we lynch the right candidate toDay we don’t have to rely on coinflip luck tomorrow.
Vote Hooker Chemical
**DeadCat, **I think I have answered all your criticisms of me except one. That I said we should ignore Mahaloth’s last postings. You find that wrong. I disagree in that Mahaloth is an experienced poster and would probably be quite able to be deceptive.
But if I am wolf, why is it more helpful to Scum to say that we should not pay attention to those posts? What do you see in these posts now that would make a Scum Biotop tell everyone to ignore them? What more do you realize now from reading Mahaloth’s final comments than you did if you didn’t analyze them?
We have a difference of opinion on how those final **Mahaloth **posts should have been handled at the time. Fair enough. But I don’t see why your theory of me as Scum is advanced by our disagreement.
One final note:
I am now going Christmas shopping with my wife, and then playing bridge at the Cavalier Inn tonight until at least 11:00 pm. Do I need to post a link to those results tonight in order for folks to believe that is why I am not around? Sorry I am being cranky, but I absolutely hate that my work/personal time schedule has led to suspicions on me, because it is something I can do nothing about. If I get mislynched because of my work schedule, then I apologize to Town. I was reluctant to sign-up to this game early on for fear of how much time it would take. That said, I have had great fun playing, so don’t read this as criticism. This has been a blast however the game turns out. It’s just frustrating too. I am doing the best I can.
My work schedule this week:
Today: OFF
Tuesday: OFF
Wednesday: 11;30 to 8pm
Thursday: 11:30 to 8pm
Friday: OFF
I work 45 minutes drive from my house, so that must be factored into it as well.
I’m 99.9% sure we’re down to one scum, and equally sure it isn’t snfaulkner. That leaves me two candidates who I’ve had at or near the top of my “least scummy” list for most of the game: Biotop and Dead Cat. First, to the wolf of the two, win or lose, well played. It’s come down to three people who have never brought down much suspicion.
Dead Cat, I strongly disagree that SP’s vote and arguments against you are exonerating. At least, no more so than Mahaloth’s votes against me and Biotop. SP was a marked man from dawn, and his posts must be taken with an unhealthy amount of salt.
In terms of voting record, both Dead Cat and Biotop have one major misstep in voting that I see. Dead Cat was the go-ahead vote against Sario (switching from Prof P in Post 284). Biotop’s misstep is the pivot from the SP lynch to the Octarine lynch on Day Four.
(I’m sure I have missteps in my record as well, such as my early voting record.)
VOTE DEAD CAT
Going back to Post 710, I think Dead Cat as scum gives a weak answer to three of the four mysteries posted by Biotop.
How did Professor Pepperwinkle escape the lynch on Day 1?
Dead Cat cast the go-ahead vote on Sario, switching over from Prof P on Day One. (I came over two votes later, while Biotop held his position voting for a Prof P lynch.)
- Why did the wolves kill Precambrianmollusc on Night 2?*
I cannot think of an answer to this one. I have two guesses and neither suggest either Biotop or Dead Cat as scum. First, the remaining wolf is a follower-type role and they knew PCM was a power role from a Night One result. Second, the wolves chose not to target a townie likely to be protected by a doctor (i.e. the “first tier” kill list).
I don’t think any scenario for the remaining scum offers a satisfying answer to this question.
Why did Mahaloth give in so easily on Day 3?
Mahaloth confessing lends townie credit to anybody voting before the confession, in this case me and Dead Cat, and he believed he would be lynched anyway. This is not a great answer and is weakly suggestive that either Dead Cat or I are scum.
- If Suburban Plankton is a wolf, why are all the players voting for him? Where is the other wolf?*
This is partially solved in a concrete way. We now know SP was a wolf and that the other wolf is not Dante G or snfaulkner.
Votes racked up pretty quickly on SP. Once both snfaulkner and Dante were on board the SP lynch, it was a done deal. I speculate that the night conversation was an agreement that SP was likely going to be bussed. Again, this suggests both Dead Cat and I could be the scum, as we were the first to vote SP yesterDay.
Finally, I’m trusting my gut. Over the past two Days, Biotop comes across as more genuinely townie. From the frustrated posts about timing of EOD and requests for more time to deliberate, to the content of the deliberation, I get “townie” from Biotop. Meanwhile, I get “scum” from Dead Cat’s insistence that they are the most townie.
And on preview, I see I have completed the circular firing squad.
Yes, it seems I got at least one thing right - the Mexican stand off I predicted has come to pass. However, not for long. I haven’t got time to post in more detail right now, but at the moment I find myself much more swayed by Biotop’s postings today than HookerChemical’s. As such, while I may well change a couple more times yet,
UNVOTE Biotop
VOTE HookerChemical
Biotop, I am from the UK but have been on this board long enough to know all about the ‘holidays’, and Black Friday etc. The latter is attempting to make its way across the pond but it appears we are resisting a bit for now. I have also worked retail. I feel your pain and I didn’t mean to upset you. Having said that, for clarity it wasn’t that that made me change my vote.
I should be able to come back and make further points in the next 48 hours or so.
Oh jeez! where to begin…
First of all, I’m sorry I was absent for EoD discussions. There was QUITE a LOT of drunkeness and hangoveritude over the last 4 days/nights. So even tho I was at work Thursday and Sunday, I was really incapable of putting brainpower to playing.
Second, I’m glad my deductive skills finally resulted in a wolf lynch (or so I like to think). Great game Suburban Plankton. I look forward to playing with you again. And again, sorry if I was belligerent the other Day…another reason I forced myself to not play when drinking last Night.
Third, Sub Plankton flipping as the Alpha fucks everything up for me. That cleared Dante G and me as 100% townies. But Dante G was the only other one I felt might even remotely be wolf…Good game Dante, may you rest in peace!
Fourth, I of course assume I will be killed toNight unless we lynch the last wolf toDay for the Win, so regardless, this is my last Day.
Finally, the thought of me being The One to make The Vote that could make or break this game fills me with dread. Especially sine i have to pick from the three people I thought were solidly town. As to give this my best, and to not run afoul of the hammer rule, I am forgoing a vote at this time until I can get a handle on All That Has Happened. I do have some weak suspicions, but I need to do a lot of rereading before I can voice any of them…
FWIW, updated vote record…I find the process of putting these together helps almost as much as looking at it once I’m done with it…
Day 1
Sario Lynched - 8 votes: (IRConfused 55)(Prof. Pepperwinkle 191)(snfaulkner 237)(Astral Rejection 245)(Dead Cat 284)(WF Tomba 288)(Hooker Chemical 297)(Mahaloth 303)
Prof Pepperwinkle - 4 votes: (Sario 38)(Precambrianmollusc 76)(Biotop 211)(Texcat 218)
IRConfused - 1 vote: (Octarine 160)
snfaulkner - 1 vote: (Suburban Plankton 127)
Mahaloth - 1 vote: (Dante G 129)
Night 1
Astral Rejection
Prof. Pepperwinkle
Day 2
WF Tomba Lynched - 8 votes: (Sub Plankton 372)(Octarine 377)(Dante G 378)(snfaulkner 384)(Dead Cat 404)(HookerChemical 407)(Biotop 427)(Texcat 433)
Dante G - 1 votes: (Precambrianmollusc 365)
Mahaloth - 1 vote: (IRConfused 376)
snfaulkner - 1 vote: (WF Tomba 386)
HookerChemical - 1 vote: (Mahaloth 436)
Night 2
Precambrianmollusc Doctor
Day 3
Mahaloth ROLEBLOCKER Lynched - 7 vote: (Dead Cat 500) (TexCat 516)(HookerChemical 518)(snfaulkner 519)(Biotop 549)(Octarine 550)(IRConfused 560)
Octarine - 2 vote: (Suburban Plankton 503) (Dante G 504)
Biotop - 1 vote: (Mahaloth 495)
Night 3
TexCat Macho Vigilante
Day 4
Octarine Lynched - 5 (Biotop 663, IRConfused 668, Suburban Plankton 671, snfaulkner 673, Dead Cat 676)
Suburban Plankton = 1 (HookerChemical 657)
snfaulkner - 1 vote - (Dante G 628)
Dante G - 1 vote - (Octarine 610)
Night 4
IRConfused Town Cop
Day 5
Suburban Plankton ALPHA LYNCHED - 5 votes - (HookerChemical 696)(Dead Cat 697)(snfaulkner 703)(DanteG 707)(Biotop 724)
Dead Cat - 1 vote - (Suburban Plankton 699)
Night 5
Dante G