On the other hand, Trump’s spokesbots spin and bend over backwards far better than any gymnast.
“A little song, a little dance,
A little seltzer down your pants.”
Pants on Fire.
only saw 1st of Blitzer show.
we’ll see.
The seltzer should help with that.
You just know that if Trump were under gunfire and a toddler within reach could be used as a shield, Trump would go for it. He wouldn’t hesitate.
Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk!"
Even more likely to do so if the toddler was somewhat, shall we say, brownish.
Brown babies make the best shields, the absolute best! Beautiful shields.
So I guess this means Trump would take Ohio, yes?
It’s a bit of an academic exercise, but: would Trump’s election chances be equally damaged by a photo of him using a white baby to shield himself from gunfire, as compared with a photo of him using a darker-skinned baby to shield himself from gunfire?
Personally I don’t think Trump would be bigoted in this regard. He’d simply grab whichever baby was closest.
They all seem to be saying that. One on Wolf Blitzer, when shown the clip of Trump saying to Blitzer that we should declare victory in Iraq and get out, pretty much denied what he just saw Trump say.
I’d love to see a 2 ton weight from Monty Python fall on these idiots. Or at least the host ask how they could possibly lie to that extent. But I guess they would never get another Trump spokesperson on if they actually got confronted.
One person did call the Trump liar Baghdad Bob, though. Maybe we should call them all Baghdad Bob.
On Wednesday, the liberal media was all abuzz over allegations that the Clinton Foundation had tried to influence the State Department.
So my question is:
WHY THE HELL WAS DONALD TRUMP CARRYING ON ABOUT OBAMA AND ISIS INSTEAD OF GOING AFTER CROOKED HILLARY?
Obama is United Church of Christ, which makes him an apostate. That’s death penalty stuff to Daesh.
Still, there is a shadow of a fair point here. The GWB and BHO administrations were very willing to destabilize secular authorities even if it created openings for religious radicals. I blame Rumsfeld and Dubya more than Obama, but Obama and Clinton supposedly “helped” spread the chaos into Syria and Libya.
So, not Daesh, but they’ve helped Daesh out entirely too much.
He’s following her game plan.
In Syria, obama did strengthen Isis by working against Assad.
The bullets they’d stop? I mean, the bullets that I hear they’d stop… because I hear a lotta things… would be YU-uuuge!!! :dubious:
My question would be:
Why would you nominate a Buffoon who can’t even read your media talking points off of the teleprompter correctly, let alone understand the points that you wanted him to try to make?
What’s Next?
“I think Hillary would make a Terrible Server. I certainly wouldn’t tip her.”
:smack::smack::smack::smack::smack::smack::smack::smack::smack:
#DrumpfCap
But did he found ISIS?
Nope, he found Osama Bin Laden, and then he blowed him up real good.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Isis would be dead by now and so much bloodshed would be prevented if it wasn’t allowed to flourish in Syria. 300k+(and counting) Syrians have died thanks to Obama’s policies.