Trump releases argument that the 2020 election was stolen

Probably just like how he managed to pass in college. And high school. And kindergarten.

Oh, I never imagined for a moment that he compiled this himself. But I’m even surprised that he had the initiative to get an underling to do it. Usually he just promises that he has some major breakthrough coming and never delivers anything, ever.

Electoral-vote.com had a take on it, which was not much different than the take in this thread.
Electoral-vote.com

I am not a Trumper. Nor do I know any personally. Not that admit it openly at least.

But I’d wager that if you pointed out this cowardice, this hypocrisy, this insincerity, if you brought up this point to a Trumper, they’d say that it’s because the courts are crooked and another tool that the Left/Deep State uses to persecute him.

The courts. Where everything is on the record. Where you’re entitled by law to defend yourself. Where evidence is carefully analyzed. Where either an impartial jury or a nonpartisan judge makes a ruling. That’s where the bias is.

Well, yeah. If someone or some thing (like facts, or reality) goes against His Majesty, it must be biased. Facts have always been left-leaning.

Where half the judges were appointed by Republicans, and many by Trump himself.

I’m really saddened to know that The Deep StateTM finally got to @Atamasama :wink:

LOL, I’m technically part of government so I guess I am the Deep State. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

This release goes along with his claim that the January 6 Committee destroyed all the evidence that the election was stolen. Therefore, he can’t be properly defended in the Election Interference case. (In reality Jack Smith is working to keep him from bringing this bullshit into the trial.) So, in his quest for jury nullification, he released this. Here’s the proof America, the truth is being covered up, decide for yourselves.

Yeah, but…

This is necessary for the ongoing grift. Nevermind that it’s a weak re-hash of obvious half-truths and discredited theories, to the TRUE BELIEVER, it’s proof. It’s another document that can be pointed to and linked to and forwarded and used to keep the TRUE BELIEVERS truly believing.

TRUE BELIEVER - you know, people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know… morons.

Or, as Hillary said, deplorables.

In the case of the NYT, they’ve thoroughly debunked everything and probably saw no reason to give this idiot more space in their paper.

Hate to disagree with the interpretation, but…

Yes, in 2022, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal. The stats following show how drop boxes were used in the 2020 election and how they could have been abused. It’s not saying that the drop boxes were illegal in 2020, it’s saying that they should have been.

This is not proof that they were abused, but they show circumstantial evidence that they were. The creator of the report is obviously biased, for example:

calling them "trafficker " is loaded language, and how do they know that they made “multiple visits to non-governmental organizations”? Especially since the article footnoted said that video was unavailable.

Question, if the Dems are so good at fixing elections, then why do we have a GOP controlled Congress?

The evidence is cell phone data.

So if you work in the vicinity of the drop box, and pass by it on your way to and from work, you probably would be counted as making 26 “visits” to the drop box during the 13 day period in question.

Even if you never dropped anything in the box.

Why, just today, I went to my job at a private school, and then stopped by Staples and the bank on the way home, and then came back to my apartment. That’s, by my count, four visits to non-governmental organizations, at least.

Which illustrates, of course, why “visits to non-governmental organizations” is completely meaningless.

It’s just like…

If the Democrats hadn’t fixed the elections, the Republicans would have won all of them by from 117% to as high as 124%.

I’d be curious for any explanation Trump might care to offer as to how exactly the dog ate his homework here. So there was one single copy of “the evidence” that was going to exonerate Trump but that evil secret-Democrat Liz Cheney somehow got her hands on all of it and made it disappear? Is that what happened now? It’s like an episode of 24, set in the universe of Idiocracy.

The easy response to Trump’s claim is to tell him that he’s making a serious accusation and that he’d better have evidence of it that he can bring to court. Otherwise that is defamation. And he definitely knows what that is at this point.

Yes, but he still has no concept of the consequences of defamation. As far as Trump is concerned, the consequences merely mean he has to send out another fundraising letter, and then stall the payment of his fines as long as possible so he can pocket the cash.