Trump's Promises & What His Fans Expect

All Presidential candidates make promises. But Trump’s have seemed to be more ridiculous and unrealistic than most–building a wall to keep Mexicans out; bringing back factories with high-paying jobs; deporting all immigrant criminals during his first hour as President; and vastly increasing spending on the military while radically cutting taxes, for starters.

Some of his supporters take these promises literally: they genuinely believe that Trump can sign some paper and big factories paying $100,000 annual salaries to workers will instantly appear. Mexico will pay for that Wall and Americans will be paid high wages to build it (and go on getting those high wages for life). Tax revenues can be cut drastically, and yet police protection and military spending will be increased.

Other Trump supporters may realize that these promises are unlikely to be fulfilled. But they still support Trump-----because they are confident that he will do the one thing that won’t be expensive for the government to provide, yet will mean the world to them:

Trump’s implicit promise is that he will give white straight Christian males the status to which their birth entitles them: First Class Citizenship. And what makes a particular level of citizenship First Class is, of course, the existence of Second Class (and below!) citizenship.

In the past couple of days there’s been a lot of argument around the question, is birtherism racist? And why did Trump go on working the birther angle for so many years after “forcing” Obama to petition the state of Hawaii to release his long-form birth certificate?

Trump made his political career by asserting his entitlement to the deference of any black man: he claimed his right to make the black man Show His Papers. Because Trump outranks any black man. This is what Trump’s birtherism was all about–not just about delegitimizing an African-American President (though it certainly was that), but more importantly, about upholding the birthright of any white Christian straight male to force a black man to show him deference.

That’s the promise Trump has made to his followers: White, Northern-European-ancestry straight Christian males are, of course, at the top. But even if you fail to be at the very top (white Northern European straight Christian male), you can still claim your rightful dominance over those below you.

Look at all Trump’s positions, and how they fit in with his implicit promise to defend those who wish to assert dominance over those ‘below’ them:

[ul]
[li]—Women who don’t like being harassed at work can just leave those jobs–Trump will support the right of men to do as they like with the women working for them. [/li][li]—Non-Christians will have to prove that they hold the “correct” values if they want to enter this country–Christians have the right to enforce their values on non-Christians.[/li][li]—Christians (males, even) who fail to have white Northern European ancestry, and who came here without proper papers, will have to leave and maybe then get to come back–even if they came here as small children. Those who came here without proper papers but who are of Northern European ancestry won’t be put through this upheaval and humiliation. Northern Europeans have the right to look on with disdain as Christians who fail to be Northern European are called names and/or deported.[/li][li]—Christians (males, even) who fail to have enough white Northern European ancestry (e.g., have substantial African ancestry) will have to get used to having a “C” for “colored” put next to their name when they apply for housing, jobs, etc–following in the glorious tradition of Trump’s own businesses.[/li][/ul]
This is Trump’s pledge to his supporters: If you are a white person of a certain degree of personal insecurity, the idea that those “below” you in rank (the black, the Hispanic, the Muslim, the gay, the female, etc.) will have to bow their heads to you when you enter a room, must be irresistible. Trump will make those people official Second Class Citizens—with the “C” next to names, the “extreme vetting,” the deportation forces, the roll-back of sex-discrimination laws and women’s health care, and all the rest of the measures he’s promised so far.

The promises about high-paying factories and Wall and other improvements requiring massive spending while government revenues are slashed, may fool a small fraction of Trump supporters. But the promise of being able to expect your officially-designated “inferiors” to respectfully step aside for you, bowing and apologizing, is a potent motivator. It’s the most naked appeal to ego any politician has ever made: “you will be a little king in your own world as long as you make me king over the USA.” That’s powerful stuff–powerful enough to bring Trump’s voters to the polls with rabid enthusiasm.

Hillary Clinton cannot make an equivalent promise. All she can do is try to expose the game.
(Credit to MSNBC contributor Touré Neblett, whose remarks on yesterday’s AM Joy got me started on this line of thought.)

Could we get a little more documentation on this? Both that Trump has said he would do this, and that his businesses currently do this?

I very much agree with the overall principle of your post: Trump is trying to “Make America Great Again” by a return to 1950s social values, including institutionalized racism. I’m just dubious that he’s ever said anything specific enough to count as a smoking gun, specifically regarding mandatory labeling of persons by race.

Has Trump taken a position on affirmative action?

The site “On the issues dot org” has:

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Donald_Trump_Civil_Rights.htm

There are also sources online describing Trump criticizing Scalia for his anti-affirmative action stance, so it’s possible to argue that Trump has taken both sides of this issue—a common tactic for Trump. But on the whole I’d say that advocates for affirmative action are not going to be happy with what emerges from a Trump Presidency.

A lot of what has attracted white supremacists to Trump is that he has a ‘proud’ family heritage of institutionalizing racism over several decades, starting (at least) with father Fred who apparently used the “N” word without apology and discriminated freely in his business. Donald took over the family business in 1971 and investigations into the “C for colored” practices took place “in the 1970s”, so presumably Donald was down with the bias in renting housing.

http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/07/25/new-york-times-nicholas-kristof-highlights-trump-s-devastating-decades-long-pattern-racism/211869

As to whether a “c” is still attached to application of black applicants for Trump’s current apartment buildings: does it matter? If white supremacists believe Trump is willing to discriminate against non-whites when he is in a position to make the rules (i.e, when he becomes President), does it matter whether Trump currently abides by non-discrimination laws?

The issue is not so much 'can we document that Trump is currently discriminating?‘, it’s 'can we reasonably believe that much of Trump’s electoral support comes from people who are confident he will institutionalize discrimination when given the chance?’ —isn’t it?

It’s more about the confidence his supporters have that all Trump’s dog whistles, nods and winks, added to his existing record on the issues (religious test to enter the US; ‘deportation forces;’ ‘C for colored;’ women can just leave their job when harassed; etc.) mean that they can count on him to institutionalize second-class citizenship for those who fail to be white straight Christian males.

If elected, he will not only be naming at least one (and possibly three) Supreme Court justices, but scores of federal judges. He’ll be issuing Executive Orders and working with a Congress still filled with many Tea-Party types. Making “atrumpheid” the law of the land will be a fairly simple matter.

Acceptable to type a multi-paragraph anti-black racist rant here to match your anti-white racist rant?

Racism

Yeah, that’ll earn you a warning for insults. Don’t do it again.

Interesting that the position ‘Trump’s fans believe he’ll make all non-whites officially second-class citizens’ could be interpreted by anyone as being “anti-white.”

Although what you posit may be the desires of some Trump fans I see no reason to believe that anyone besides the paranoid left think he will go to the extremes you suggest, any more than Clinton will take away everyone’s gun, or Obama will make all whites second class citizens.

What Trump supporters actually expect is for Trump to build a wall across the Mexican border, for him to enforce immigration laws in a manner similar to Sheriff Arpaio, to prevent Muslims from entering the US, and use the Justice department to investigate Muslims and Muslim organizations in the US, similar to the way J. E. Hoover did “subversive” organizations in the 60’s. As to how many of these he will actually do it is difficult to say since he is not generally one to keep his promises.

There is a lot of other things that I expect him to do on his own such as to do whatever he can to use his post to enrich himself, and possibly try to rewrite slander laws so he can sue anyone who says bad things about him, but those are not the sort of things he is going to campaign on.

I don’t think either Trump or his supporters consider measures that will institutionalize discrimination against certain demographic groups to be “extreme”…I believe they consider such to be merely ‘restoring the natural order.’

Erhm, even by the most extreme interpretations of Trump’s intentions and views, he isn’t a pan-Nordicist. This isn’t 1900 anymore-you can’t build a nativist coalition anymore by appealing to just “Northern Europeans” as opposed to a broader white/Euro-American identity and if voting returns indicate anything, he has plenty of support from Italians, Irish, and Eastern Europeans. Additionally, Trump is probably the least religious Republican candidate in decades.

I agree with the proposition that Trump doesn’t personally care about exalting Protestants above all others–but many of his allies do care about accomplishing that, and Trump does need allies.

Similarly, the Eastern and Southern Europeans may well be raised to the level of the Nordics due to the need for a coalition. (But we don’t want the Irish!)*

*just kidding. The Irish will pass.

If Hitler was able to accept the Italians and the Japanese as honorary members of the Aryan Race, the Trumpenstinians will have no problem with the U.S. citizen descendants of the non-Nordic white immigrants.

There is still some good will left in the world then.

Amazing how much of a push back from the last 30 years trump’s campaign represents… Is this the last gasp of ignorant, racist (white) men in a rapidly changing country? I hope so, I’m strong believer in a better tomorrow not some fake glorious past…

The sad part is that he probably could care less about his base, he is flat out using them (by lying and saying what their dark sides want to hear) for his own benefit.

“Can’t we get you on Mastermind, Sybil? Next contestant, Mrs. Sybil Fawlty from Torquay. Specialist subject, the bleeding obvious.” – Basil Fawlty

Well, it’s not obvious to his fans. (So perhaps it does bear repeating.)

For many Trump supporters, it’s not that complex. The specific policy details can wait, or don’t matter. What they are tired of is “same old, same old”. They are sick and tired of being sick and tired, to use the expression. They can overlook almost any flaw in the Donald. What they want is to take a sledgehammer to Washington DC and smash the establishment. They want upheaval of the status quo.

For these folks, talking about racism, sexism, “Trump’s budgets don’t add up” is just noise whistling past their ears. They don’t care. They want to smash the “same old” and have something radically different for once. The pieces from the wreckage can be picked up and sorted out later.
And in an era of poverty, high student debt, $30,000 hospital bills, job outsourcing, laws not being enforced, condescending media, everyone-has-a-grievance, and short attention spans, and endless stories about Washington gridlock - frankly, they do have a point. It’s hard to blame them. I don’t support Trump, but his supporters’ visceral disgust with the status quo is perfectly understandable. Wanting to smash the “same old, same old” establishment is a legit sentiment to a certain extent.

This claim is frequently made by Trump supporters, but I’m skeptical. Really, what people are craving is to have Grandma’s Social Security check fail to show up, and the meat-processing plant stop being inspected, and the National Guard pay system go kablooey? Really? People are craving highways that don’t get repaired and seeing the Coast Guard shut down their bases and VA hospitals close? Seriously??

As I say: I’m skeptical. I can’t help suspecting it’s just another fake excuse.