Unfortunately, the chief of them was Dick Cheney, and we can only wish he had been ignorant and lazy.
Why go that route when there are plenty of young, current Nazis who would love to do their part in the Trump administration?
See? Like that guy. Attorney General material there.
From the article:
It’s interesting to me that the Nazis can overlook Trump’s marriage to a “Slav”. I thought the Nazis hated the Slavs. Anyway, Heidi Cruz is apparently a “slut” for working for Jewish bankers. I guess she had sex with all of them. Also she’s somehow committed treason. Not sure what was treasonous about that, but then I’m not Attorney General material.
Also, “Tedman Cruise Ship”? Huh?
Trump supporter who threatened to blow up a California mosque in December has been sentenced to 90 days in county jail and three years probation:
90 days in county jail. Yeah, that’ll teach him. If he was a Muslim who threatened to blow up a Christian church, I’m sure he would get the same sentence.
Ted Cruz evidently enjoys fucking rats, but not just any rat.
“Well, let me be clear. Donald Trump may be a rat but I have no desire to copulate with him.”
Even a ratfucker has standards.
[QUOTE=Futurama]
Nixon’s back!!
[/QUOTE]
!
But, really? Why do the most shady Republicans still look at the worst administration for “talent”? (Cheney, Rumsfield, etc. for Dubya)
BTW, this appears to be based on some confusion on Cruz’ part about the meaning of the word “ratfucking” in a political sense.
Which Ted Cruz has no excuse not to know.
The old ways work best, doncha know.
This apparently got lost in the wife bashing headlines:
Trump puts tactical nuclear weapons on the table in the fight against ISIS.
Trump is really begging for it:
Famous "Daisy" Attack Ad from 1964 Presidential ElectionVote for the Democrat on November 8th, the stakes are too high for you to stay home.
There’s an extension to that: Get out the vote for November 8. Suggesting it to people here is preaching to the choir. Convince people that their vote REALLY matters in stopping the media monstrosity that is the Donald.
Two simple questions should do it: Do you truly trust Trump to act in your interest in the most powerful position on Earth?..and…Is this the way you want the US to be represented to the rest of the world?
Phares is most certainly not Palestinian. He’s a Maronite from Lebanon.
He could still be a leader of a Palestinian Christian militia, even if he’s not Palestinian. Yes, it’s not clear how all the adjectives in “Palestinian Christian militia leader” modify each other, it could be (Palestinian-Christian militia) leader or (Palestinian-Christian) (militia leader) or even (Palestinian ((Christian militia) leader).
The article doesn’t mention Palestinian anything. And it should be noted the guy was apparently purely political in Lebanon and was actually a Romney campaign advisor as well.
It is obvious what the intention behind Trump’s answer was. It was a rebellion against the media’s attempt to associate him with reviled figures and groups, through repetition and insinuation, in order to vilify him. Whether or not you consider it good is just one data point. So far Trump’s methods are working well for him. No one knows how much more success they will bring him, but we will know in November.
No, I don’t think that is an unreasonable standard. It’s just that it is one of many standards. Some people on Twitter, like Trump, post all kinds of crap. To most twitterers, posting something just means “look at this thing”, not “I have carefully vetted this and endorse the message, it’s creator, and everyone who has ever retweeted it”.
Except that his judgment and knowledge seem to be working.
There is a huge outpouring of ignorant accusations directed at Trump and his supporters. They don’t help anything.
The big drop in the aggregate polls seen by Trump against Bernie or Hillary in recent weeks is hard to explain unless one takes into account that the majority of Americans are not believing in that “intention”. Besides, his official talking point is that it was a lousy earpiece that caused that snafu (implying that Trump would had come with what **drad dog **expected Trump to respond), it is really sad to continue to make the point about what he intended there.
Why would you say “even in preference to Clinton”? Clinton is the only one running who I could vote for. I don’t buy into the caricature of her that the right wing attack machine has been hammering away at any more than I buy into the BS narrative about Trump.
I rank the candidates: Cruz<Bernie<Rubio/Jeb/Mitt<Rand Paul<Trump<Hillary. All but Clinton have disqualifying characteristics in my book, I would never vote for them. I consider Trump’s statement “they are rapists” in a public discussion about illegal immigrants to be demagoguery, and so I wouldn’t vote for him or tell any one else to vote for him.
It is impossible not to appreciate his mutilation of the GOP, though. And the GOP is just one of many actors arrayed against him, and most of the rest of them deserve what he is doing to them just as much. So no, I don’t want Trump as POTUS. But every time I see these bullshit reports and arguments, essentially labeling mainstream American voters as Nazis and KKK sympathizers, that instinctive opposition to President Trump gets chipped away at just a tad. The hateful actions and language from so many quarters is so extreme that it almost seems like it justifies Trump’s rhetoric, and the stances of his supporters. If he ends up getting elected the Trumpophobes really will be getting what they deserve (and the vast majority of them are white).
Among republicans yes, but not all of them and pointing that it is “working” really does not mean good news or a flattering thing to report as you are implying.