Yeah, but it’s a big cast and for ever Peter Dinklage (4’5”) or Kit Harrington.(5’8”) you also have a Jason Momoa (6’4”) or Rory McCanne (6’6”) against a Masie Williams (5’1”) and Emilia Clarke (5’2”)
If movies count then any movie with Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman
The problem with movies is that it’s going to be much harder to come up with an acceptable definition of which actors to consider. Movies tend to have dozens of credited actors; if you consider the whole cast then it will be virtually impossible to find any films where all the women are taller than the men. On the other hand, if you consider only the top-billed ones (such as, say, the ones writ large on the movie poster), then it becomes trivially easy to find examples.
TV shows are a good compromise because there is almost always a very clear delineation in the credits between starring and recurring/guest roles, and because even shows regarded as having large ensemble casts don’t usually have more performers than you can count on your fingers. There are plenty of well-known shows with only two or three starring roles.
Only three male characters regularly appear on the new iteration of Matlock, and they’re all shorter than the main female characters.
Kathy Bates is 5’3”. At 77 years old I wouldn’t be surprised if she shrunk a little but still has her height listed the same.
NiCole Robinson wasn’t in the opening credits, but she played Margaret (Leo’s secretary) in 109 episodes. She’s 5’10".
Yeah, I’m confused about this claim of @HeyHomie’s. Surely Bates, who plays the series’s main character, isn’t taller than Jason Ritter and David Del Rio.
Yeah that was my bad. I don’t know what I was thinking.
I was going to submit Leanne, a Netflix sitcom that features Kristen Johnston, but it also featured Ryan Styles, who stands 6’6”.