Updike and New Iskander, it's a twofer tuesday!

I’d like to take this opportunity to thank you for contributing $14.95 to this community.

I’d also like to take this opportunity to tell you that I would happily have paid $14.95 to not have it contaminated by you.

If we ask nicely, will you go away?

But I thought we were supposed to respect and honor different cultural practices, not ridicule (or condemn) them. Where did I go wrong?

What a juicy Straight Line…

By ignoring the human rights element as usual (funny that the left is usually paying more attention to items like that).

Your troglodyte position only justifies either killing the doctors performing or the women having abortions, it is a moral position that indeed will be at home in locations that stone and perform FGM.

Since you hate that America is protecting women against that, I suggest to you to leave at once to the places were you will be proud to show your ignorance.

I can see the difference, but it’s you who refuses to see the similarity!

It’s politically incorrect, and quite likely racist, for you to insinuate that cultural practices in places like Nigeria are ignorant.

What are you, the Great White Savior? We should just try to understand stoning, etc. and Celebrate! our differences. It makes the world go around. Right?

Ok, you got me there. What is the similarty between a Jew and an abortionist?

They’re both the innocent victims of terrorists! :wally

similarty is spelled similarity, you missed the I :wally

In what way, shape, or form are abortionists “innocent” victims?

:dubious:

sim·i·lar·i·ty (sĭm’ə-lăr’ĭ-tē) pronunciation
n., pl. -ties.

  1. The quality or condition of being similar; resemblance. See synonyms at likeness.
  2. A corresponding aspect or feature; equivalence: a similarity of writing styles.

So what now, Jews are similiar to abortionists? That’s a rather interesting theory there. Please explain further.

The way, shape, and form that involves not having been convicted of a crime.

Except in the opinion of a terrorist.
crowmanyclouds, all due respect, but the copy-editor schtick has a definite shelf-life.

I’m bored with it myself!

Most of the terrorists haven’t been convicted of a crime, either. They have a fortunate tendency to blow themselves up first. It doesn’t mean they deserve any sort of consideration, though.

abortion (for Aryans) was banned in Nazi Germany. Cite. Happy now?

Your attempts at tap dancing are pathetic. Seeing a troglodyte attempting that is amusing though.

The whole “I’m going to attempt to use your own rhetoric against you, but, um, I don’t know what your rhetoric actually is” is quite a cute game.

I’m glad that Puppy is working on proving how stupid he is without me needing to lift a finger.

So Updike is now calling other people racist? In this thread, he found it perfectly reasonable to assume that any black people headed across the bridge from New Orleans into Gretna to escape the destruction from Hurricane Katrina must necessarily be going there to loot stores and shoot at firefighters (posts 18, 22, 27, 28, 40, 44, 45).

Out of curiousity, Updike, what’s a receptionist working for an abortionist guilty of and why should she have to die? What are rescue workers responding to a bomb going off guilty of? For that matter, what’s a woman going to Planned Parenthood for treatment of a miscarriage or infertility guilty of? The latter may not be killed, but what is she doing to deserve to be called a “baby killer”?

For the record, I’ve researched Planned Parenthood’s prices for basic gynecological care. They are a good bargain for people without insurance.

CJ
I know I should stay out of this trainwreck, but I’m appalled by the possibility that someone might think that a doctor’s *receptionist * should deserve to die! [Snarky remark omitted]

Aww, this isn’t a trainwreck. This is a finely tuned Pitting! :smiley: