If by “thinking differently”, you mean expressing the view that someone accused of a crime should be subject to summary judgment without the benefit of legal defense and decision by a jury of peers, that is a view that rightfully deserves to be ‘trashed’.
I quoted @Jasmine’s quote in the original post (and copied verbatim from the previous thread verbatim without truncation or editing. And to be clear, while I did call out that specific poster this was not intended to be a general criticism of her character but to specifically address the view expressed in that post and shared by others. Had I put more thought into it I would have made it a non-poster-specific o.p. but it was cut & pasted from the original thread after the moderator (correctly) adjudicated that opinions about the application of summary judgment was not an appropriate discussion for the Factual Questions forum. @Jasmine did, as noted above, apologize for her off-the-cuff remarks, and you’ll note that I haven’t made any further issue of her statement, and to the extent that acknowledgement of her retraction need be made, I’ll note she did so immediately and with succinct grace after the moderator’s note, so I don’t think anything more needs to be made of her views.
You, on the other hand, have continued to protest and prostrate yourself as a victim being made the subject of criticism even as you hog the spotlight at every single opportunity. So if attention isn’t what you actually want, maybe just give it a rest.
Stranger