Veganism

Myself, I have a problem with people who say things like “our nearest relatives, the great apes, eat X, Y, and Z so that’s our natural diet”. First of all, we aren’t chimps or gorillas, we’re humans. For all that we have in common (and there is much that we have in common) there are also significant differences. For that matter, chimps and gorillas do not eat an identical diet, either. And chimps do eat meat when they can get it, and have even been known to hunt for it. I wouldn’t argue that a steak a day is natural for them, but obviously eating the occassional slow monkey, rodent, or termite is something they do.

But there are also arguments like “milk isn’t natural for an adult mammal”. You might just as well say egg-laying isn’t a natural mammal activity, either, but Australia has several egg-laying mammals so obviously there are exceptions. The fact is some human populations DO retain the ability to digest lactose into adulthood, and by virtue of that biochemical ability I’d have to conclude that yes, it IS “natural” for at least some varieties of human to eat dairy all their lives. Maybe we’re evolving into to cow parasites - why not? Would that be somehow less “natural” than vampire bats and tapeworms? Maybe it’s not a glamourous lifestyle but food is food. While eating dairy as an adult is not a universal human trait I see no reason to deny milk-based foods to those who do retain lactase beyond childhood. They don’t have to consume dairy, but it is an option.

Likewise eating meat - while there may be some folks with a genuine physical intolerance the vast majority of humans can eat, digest, and gain nutrition from meat and other animal products. They can choose to not eat those foods, but eating them is in no way “unnatural” as long as we are able to actually digest the stuff. In this regard, I think those arguing from ethics have a stronger position than those attempting to argue from biology.

Um… yes and no. In theory there are a LOT of low-carb vegetarian foods, but they aren’t always easy to obtain since some are exotic and not commonly found.

The other problem is how vegetarians obtain complete proteins in their diet. This usually involves combining a legume with a grain, and grains are considered high-carb. So, yes, I can see there would be some difficulty in eating a balanced low-carb no-animal-product diet.

On the other hand, the Atkins diet is not NO-carb forever. After weight loss goals are achieved you are supposed to add fruit and some carbs back in

Solely as my opinion, I do think some vegetarians eat too many carbs and might benefit from taking a page or two from Atkins. On a true vegan diet a person has to make an effort to get enough fats and oils, particularly if growing or very active, which is contrary to what most of us in the western world are dealing with. A few more low-carb, high vegee salads with nuts on top and a little less bread and potatoes might do some of the vegetarians some good.

Well, for starters there is not just one and only one “vegan diet”. Certainly, some vegans eat a lot of bread, pasta, and flour but not all. You also have to look at the quality of the grain products (which is what we’re really talking about). Brown rice, true whole wheat, and the like are much more nutrient dense and fiber rich than their processed cousins, and the carbs in them are digested and absorbed much more slowly.

There’s also the matter of proportion. In a vegetarian diet some of the daily protein requirement is satisfied by that “bread, pasta, and flour” (or rice, wheatberries, etc.) so you can’t consider it as just carbs, it plays a slightly more complex role. Some meals will be high-carb, but as the low-carb salad (which, by the way, can be quite satisfying a meal) shows not all of them will be. As with all diets, variety is important. The more varied the diet the more likely it is to be healthy. A vegan who’s diet is 50-75% grain is not as healthy as one who eats a wider variety of stuff in more equal proportions. Just because someone gives up meat/animal derieved foods does not make them a paragon of health.

Hmm… no, you couldn’t - mainly because you’d be so busy eating you wouldn’t have time for other stuff.

There’s a reason critters like elephants, horses, and cows spend so much of their time eating. If you live on just plants, you’re big, and you’re busy you need to eat a LOT of stuff. Could a human being consume 5,000-10,000 calories a day on a vegan diet? Yeah… and this person would spend 18 hours a day eating, probably. Not counting all the time spent, uh, >cough<, >cough< disposing of the used fiber-rich food.

Which might be why our ancestors started eating more meat in the first place - it has concentrated energy (fat) as well as protein. Spend less time eating and you have more time for chipping flint, discovering agriculture, inventing writing and civilization and, oh yes, making those airplanes someone mentioned earlier.

In fact, in some cultures the fat of the animal is valued more than the meat - think about muktuk, which is whale blubber, that is, whale fat. That’s an extreme example, but folks used to save the lard as well as the pork chops. When there was a lot physical labor involved in existance fats and oils were necessary parts of the diet. (They still are - but we eat too much of them now for our activity levels)

If I was hungry enough…

It is not that I care what their diet is, but rather that if they want me to switch, they’d have to give me a justification for that. One cannot legitimately say that the onus is upon me to explain my views; I am not the one proselytizing.

And as it stands, the fact that animals die is no more consequences to me than my fingernails.

Apart from an apparent hyperbole, I agree with smiling bandit. Whatever compassion I have for animals does not translate into even for a moment not considering them as a source of food.

I was looking at the trend more then a conclusive statement.

Agreed, but it doesn’t meant here is no basis for compairason between the 2.

Also I would not think tofu is natural for humans.

Biologically speaking we can eat other humans, ethically we can’t (not willing to argue this point! - does not serve the OP). So there is justification for ethics overriding biology. I am interested in the ethics that does not permit us to kill and eat animals.

[quick lesson on Atkins]
Atkins is not No-carb it is low carb which in short can be broken down into 3 stages:
1 - Induction - less then 20 g carbs per day
2 - Atkins diet - less then what is known as your critical carb level (CCL), which is the level over which you will go out of ketoisis, usually between 30 at 70 g/d.
3 - Meat and millet (now called maintainance) which allows some more carbs once you wish to stop weightloss - perhaps another 20-30 g.

Of the 3 the only one that allows fruit is the meat and millet, but very sparingly. For the most part fruit will be out. Also if you cheat on Atkins you have to re-do induction to get back into it.
[/quick lesson on Atkins]*

For overall health benifits meat and millet is just as good at Atkins but w/o the weightloss aspects. If you are on lowcarb for the heath benfits, such as lowering colestrohol or controlling diabedies (yes I know I mangled the spellings), you can go from induction right to meat and millet (once you find your CCL). So some fruits can be eaten - but don’t think some fruits as a lot, it’s maybe a cup of strawberries a day, perhaps a 1/3 of an apple per day while restricting other carbs to compensate. You are indeed extreamly limited in such high sugar fruits.

There are other ‘low’ carb diets, that do allow fruits (neatherthin) and ones with reward meals which allow youto eat anything in moderation once in a while. They are not as low carb as Atkins but have some simularities.

I was using the term vegan diet loosly in a sense to refer to those who don’t eat aminal products of any kind. I really don’t know much of the food choices that a vegan has but made the following assumptions:

1 - They eat a broader range of ‘legal’ foods then a non-vegan would eat that could fall into ‘legal vegan’ food catagory. Example:

Vegan might eat a soyburger & greenbeans.
Non-vegan might eat hamburger & greenbeans
Vegan has 2 ‘vegal legal’ foods while non vegan has only one and would not consider a soyburger. So a vegan has a broader selection.

2 - Vegans have an overall smaller number of foods available to them then the non-vegan

3 - Vegans have to be careful to get needed nutrition much more then non-vegans and as a result become more aware of the food chioces and their health effects.

So it would seem that it vegans might tend away from pasta and the like if they are informed and what to get the maximun health benifits. Also whole grain breads and such are known in both circles (low-carb and vegan) to be in general better.

I see a lot of simularites between low carb and veganism, even though the actual food consumed is different.

I like a good chicken ceaser salid and often order it as a meal, yes I know it has chicken but understand how a salid can be a meal - an quite a satisfying one at that.

The Eskimo diet is sometimes cited by Atkins as proof of healthy life w/o carbs. Just wanted to point that out.

Vegans are actually a good example of why Atkins’ diet is suspicious: I’ve known a lot of vegans, but no overweight vegans. Scylla, there are plenty of extremely active vegetarians and even vegans out there; this website lists a few famous athletes who don’t eat meat, including a Triathlon winner, some boxers, a champion weightlifter, and a certain Ms. Serena Williams.

I do think that the “natural” arguments for veganism are wholly specious: anyone who is vegan because eating meat is unnatural has no business typing that message on something as “unnatural” as the Internet.

Actually, the vegan argument pits an animal life against a human convenience. Many vegans admit that if a human will suffer a significant loss of health from not eating animal products, the human is justified in eating animals.

There are very strong arguments based on behavioral science that animals can, in every sense of the word, suffer. I tend to assume that these arguments are widely known – I work in an animal shelter and am daily exposed to animal suffering – but if you need cites, let me know.

Daniel

As I pointed out the meat and millet diet (aka maintance) is not for weight loss but has benificial health benifits. Eskimos are frequently cited as examples of good health through low-carb.

The website you list is for vegitarian athleats, I differenciate vegitarian from vegan with eggs, milk products and possibly fish. I have no doubt that many can thrive on a vegitarian diet, I am not totally convinced about vegan - actually I am somewhat convinced that most will not thrive on a vegan diet.* Interesting site though.

  • Much of my convincing that most will not thrive on a vegan diet comes from my understadnign of low-carb and importance of fats and oils which I see the vegan diet lacking w/o great care.

Fair enough, I pointed out the views based on the pro-lifes camps POV, It’s only fair to compare it from the vegan’s POV as well.

[aside]I must point out that vegans who forced their babies to eat vegan food killed their child - well at least one time.[/aside]

So it boils down to human life against conveinence for abortion and animal life against conveinence for veganism.

The question might still exist as to where you put animal life with respect to human but the bigger question this really raises is life vs convienence.

I do to, is you shelter on petfinder by any chance? anyway I am not convinced that the ‘suffering’ that animals do is the same as people experence - I could be wrong. Perhaps a handy cite would be helpful, but don’t go overboard as I’ve seem cites to both effects over the years.

Well, it’s just a modest proposal.

Now I will go microwave some chicken. Try’n’stop me.

Another thing about this, as I’ve pointed out many aspects of Atkins and vegan are the same, namely green vegitables are encouraged. The problem lies in what you combine with it. Both diets make you aware of the nutrition of food in ways that the standard diet does not - that in itself is benificial.

Also most people start Atkins to loose weight, there is really noone on Atkins who is overweight because of Atkins. Like I’m sure that there are people who just started veganism today and weigh 300 lbs. Once the weight is lost a very good reason to stay on Atkins (maintance) is the health benifits, another good reason is that if you go backl to ‘normal’ eathing you will gain the weight back.

Also I would like to make the compareson that low-carb via Atkins is not a weight loss plan, it is a way of eating for life much the same as veganism is. If used just for weight loss it will fail as one switches back, as I’m sure veganism would be too if used in that matter.

We probably shouldn’t hijack this into a discussion of Atkins; God knows we’ve had more than enough of those around here.

You suggest that both pro-life and animal-rights folks pit life vs. convenience. While this is technically true, pro-wart-burning-off pits life against convenience as well. Prolifers have you pit potential human sentience against “convenience”, whereas animal-rights folks have you pit actual animal sentience against “convenience.”

(I put the words in quote marks now because I disagree that either case is merely about convenience. Giving birth, like eating, is both a health and a psychological issue; my disagreement with animal rights folks stems from my belief that eating foods is a profound experience interwoven with the eater’s culture and psychological makeup, much more than a mere convenience).

Yeah, our shelter is on Petfinder. Great website, especially with their new insurance for shelter pets. :slight_smile:

Daniel

Scylla- yes, you could eat a “vegan” diet- but you’d have to work at it, eat a lot of fats & soy, not to mention chocolate. Trust me, dude, you can get PLENTY of calories from eating nothing but chocolate covered macadamia nuts. :smiley:

And that is why you see many fat omnivores, fewer fat O-L Vegitarians (I had a friend who was O-L-V, and he WAS Fat), and few fat Vegans- and one of the reasons why the “Atkins diet” works- and why most “Fruitarians” look like the living dead. The “see food diet” is thoughtless and easy. It takes some willpower to skip some food types- and this will usually result in some wieght loss. Skipping more food types= more wieght loss. Which is why any “eat all the X you want, but no Y” diets work. (There is more than this to the Atkins diet, note, or at least many think so).

Heck, I had one freind who had a problem with dieting. Could never remember the “rules”. So watching his usual meal of 2 doublecheese burgers, XL fries and a super-big gulp Coke- I suggest only TWO changes. No more french fries or potato chips, and switch to Diet cola. He dropped 20 pounds- and kept it off. Ne could remember those rules, and it wasn’t a hardship- he wasn’t hungry, but some empty calories went away.

Scylla- yes, you could eat a “vegan” diet- but you’d have to work at it, eat a lot of fats & soy, not to mention chocolate. Trust me, dude, you can get PLENTY of calories from eating nothing but chocolate covered macadamia nuts. :smiley:

And that is why you see many fat omnivores, fewer fat O-L Vegitarians (I had a friend who was O-L-V, and he WAS Fat), and few fat Vegans- and one of the reasons why the “Atkins diet” works- and why most “Fruitarians” look like the living dead. The “see food diet” is thoughtless and easy. It takes some willpower to skip some food types- and this will usually result in some wieght loss. Skipping more food types= more wieght loss. Which is why any “eat all the X you want, but no Y” diets work. (There is more than this to the Atkins diet, note, or at least many think so).

Heck, I had one freind who had a problem with dieting. Could never remember the “rules”. So watching his usual meal of 2 doublecheese burgers, XL fries and a super-big gulp Coke- I suggest only TWO changes. No more french fries or potato chips, and switch to Diet cola. He dropped 20 pounds- and kept it off. He could remember those rules, and it wasn’t a hardship- he wasn’t hungry, but some empty calories went away.

Actually the Atkins diet is pretty much total bullshit. I started a thread debunking it not long ago. I’m pretty careful about my fitness and nutritive needs. Atkins works because you consume less calories than you do on an omnivore’s diet, and you tend to do so because of the unpalatable nature of the diet and the long prep lead times.

When you lose weight, your cholesterol also tends to drop. In this fashion it is really no different from any other fad diet, like an all ice cream diet, or one of those fruit diets.

Can you live on the Atkins diet and survive fairly healthy? yes probably. Is it a wise move? No.

Mainstream nutritionists strongly agree with what I’ve said. Atkins methods of justifying his claims are scientifically unsound. He is a fraud.

There is a central dietary registry that I linked to in that thread. All you have to do to sign up is lose thirty pounds and keep it off for three years (or 1 year, I forget.) The results there are clear. Almost nobody achieves lasting weight loss with Atkins. it’s a classic boomerang fad diet, and may be potentially dangerous as well.

Thank you Scylla for your humble opinon on the Atkins diet. Now what does that have to do with the OP?

I 1st brought it up in resposnes to the OP, Low carb and veganism is extreamly hard do do together.

Then I was able to see some simularities between the 2. I have much more experence on Atkins the veganism so I was using my information on nutrition gathered though Atkins to question different aspects of vegan nutrition.

**

You brought it up.

Informattion on nutrition gathered through Atkins? Why not just ask an astrologer?

Maybe this is slightly off topic, but I’ve become curious about this.

What’s the reasoning behind not consuming dairy products in a vegan diet?

Exgineer, virtually every dairy farm in existence kills most or all male calves that are born. I’ve heard of a Hare Krishna dairy that didn’t do this, but they didn’t sell their milk commercially; it was just for the cultists’ consumption.

Modern dairy farm techniques, in addition to killing the male calves, tend to treat the female cows very poorly indeed, allowing them to satisfy very few of their natural desires.

Daniel
drinking his coffee with cream

I’m no dairy farm expert, but isn’t this… umm… stupid? Rather than kill something that could grow into a profitable sales item, why not sell the calves to a beef farm, or just start raising and butchering the males yourself?

But you’re right about the justification behind veganism. The general philosophy as I understand it is that any food that comes from an animal represents cruelty and oppression. I’ve even seen complaints (I think from PETA, but don’t hold me to that) that eating honey is wrong, because bee farms promote the oppression of bees, and the rape of the queen bee. Basically, unless it grows in the ground, it’s off limits. Of course, these are the same people who say that claiming to “own” a dog is oppression, too, so YMMV.

Of course, that’s ethical veganism. I’ve also known vegans who just felt their diet was healthier, and they had no problem with honey.
Jeff
drinking his coffee with lotsa cream, and anticipating a tasty cow-burger at lunch, with plenty of cheese and bacon drooooool

Sorry I wasn’t clear: most dairy farms sell their male calves to veal farmers who kill them, or raise them as veal themselves and then kill them.

My parents were vegan hippies before I was born, and they lived on a commune that forbade the eating of honey. My understanding is that honey was verboten because commercial honey harvesting results in the death of hundreds or thousands of bees from each hive. Smaller beekeepers use harvesting techniques that kill far fewer bees (bees still die from trying to sting the beekeeper, for example, but they’re not crushed by industrial-strength blowers).

And this is a problem with veganism: even organic vegetable growing techniques result in the death of dozens or hundreds of small mammals per acre. Field mice are plowed up; traps are set. I talked with one organic apple grower who spoke delightedly about pumping propane into vole holes and lighting it on fire; while few voles would be caught in the direct blast, more voles would be killed by the shockwave, and at any rate this farmer found it immensely satisfying to blow up these varmints who would eat the roots of his saplings and destroy whole sections of his orchard.

Although I’ve never done the math on it, it seems plausible to me that more mammals are killed by a crop-based diet than by a range livestock-based diet. How many mice, voles, rabbits, and field rats should die in order to save one cow?

Daniel

DanielWithrow:

Okay, that makes more sense. While I certainly don’t have a problem with it (kill them when they’re young, kill them when they’re adults, whatever - they still wind up in my belly), I can see the argument against dairy farms from a vegan perspective.

Also, from what I’ve read, the type of organic farming that vegan-types tend to promote result in huge amounts of forestation being lost, especially as practiced in third-world nations. Modern, non-organic methods are much more compact and efficient. When you’re clearing out forests to make way for your green-beans, the death toll of unsuspecting woodland creatures continues to rise.

But cows are cute and cuddly! :wink:
Jeff