God, you again with your lunatic conspiracy theory, for which you made outlandish claims and offered exactly zero evidence. You were like Rudy Giuliani outside Four Seasons Total Landscaping with brown hair dye dripping down the side of your head.
Liar, liar, pants on fire.
(wipes spittle off my monitor)
You are a funny, funny little man.
You described my posts as “disgusting” and “sickening”, so you were clearly insinuating that I supported what Hamas did. For that, I will not forgive you.
No, I fucking wasn’t, you dumb motherfucker.
I used to think you were confused about this point, but it was explained to you very thoroughly, with far more patience and empathy than your behavior has merited, by a posted who is a better person than I:
Since you continue with this delusional assertion - just as you continued to assert that I want to ethnically cleanse the Gazans and chiding me by comparing me to “moderate Israelis” whose positions I not only agree with but had been advocating the whole time - I can only conclude that you are not posting in good faith. You are either a troll, or blinded by irrational hatred of Israel, or the densest being on two legs.
Where did I assert that you want to “ethnically cleanse the Gazans”? You said I “continued to assert”, implying I did so more than once.
Show me the cites, so I can see for myself what you claim.
[BTW, WTF? Nowhere in my post do I equate Hamas and Palestinians. If I was equating Hamas and Palestinians I’d ask you to show me heinous crimes committed by Palestinians, but since Hamas!=Palestinians that’s not what I did. More lies…]
Only one of your cites comes close to supporting your claim. That comment was made after you were rude after I made a post that was supportive of Palestinians, as part of the overall Israel-Palestine issue. Even though Israeli newspapers like Haaretz were bringing up and being supportive of the perspective of Palestinians before I did, I will accept that it was in a period of emotion and it could have waited an additional day.
The other comments were only made after you had equated me with supporting the murder of innocent civilians.
On Twitter, thousands of people are supporting Babale, so they must be right.
What the hell are you talking about this time?

I used to think you were confused about this point, but it was explained to you very thoroughly, with far more patience and empathy than your behavior has merited, by a posted who is a better person than I:
Thank you for the compliment, although I deny the assertation that I’m a better person than you are. Because of my own issues though, I’m keeping out of the subject, and trying (often failing, but TRYING) to be as dispassionate as possible about it. Because about 2-3 minutes into any talk about it an my emotions go through the roof.
I’m not going to say anymore past the post you quoted, because it’s just going to throw more wood on the fire, but for the record, I still stand behind everything I typed then. I still don’t think Walken is a troll, but they’re still mistaken or missing the reasons for the results.

Only one of your cites comes close to supporting your claim. That comment was made after you were rude after I made a post that was supportive of Palestinians, as part of the overall Israel-Palestine issue. Even though Israeli newspapers like Haaretz were bringing up and being supportive of the perspective of Palestinians before I did, I will accept that it was in a period of emotion and it could have waited an additional day.
As someone very much on the outside looking in, is it then possible that if you made one comment that indicated you thought that Babale advocates for ethnic cleansing, and never previously took it back but rather posted other times that seemed to at least imply that you still felt that way, it would be reasonable to read you as pushing that view on multiple occasions? (Even if that wasn’t your intention at all.)
It’s good that you don’t actually think that, and the one unambiguous assertion was made while angry and not really something you actually believed, but you should understand why it may have come across that way.
Just putting in my two cents on just one part of what is clearly a wide and ongoing feud that I really have no intention of participating in.

I still don’t think Walken is a troll, but they’re still mistaken or missing the reasons for the results.
Obviously, I think it is you that are the one that is mistaken or missing the reasons.

As someone very much on the outside looking in, is it then possible that if you made one comment that indicated you thought that Babale advocates for ethnic cleansing, and never previously took it back but rather posted other times that seemed to at least imply that you still felt that way, it would be reasonable to read you as pushing that view on multiple occasions? (Even if that wasn’t your intention at all.)
No, I would not agree with that.
Fwiw, i thought that @Walken_After_Midnight believed @Babale advocated genocide, too. I am happy to read that i was mistaken.
And yes, i guess i am blurring any distinction between genocide and ethnic cleansing.
I agree!

Babale Fish
Not at all. The Babale is a majestic creature with the body and legs of a baboon and the head and tail of a sperm whale. It possesses the size and swimming capability of the whale, as well as a devestating sonic attack, but also the agility and mobility of the baboon.
I don’t have any surviving photographs of the noble Babale, but I found this picture online of its cousin, the Moosale, which shares the Babale’s size and profile but possesses the hooves and body of a moose.
okay, now find a Walken fish