"Wanna dance? Wait -- sign this waiver first."

This is not recreational outrage.

From CNN:

After I stopped laughing at “flipping her into the air at an office party,” which calls to mind the disco scene in Airplane!, I started wondering why the dancing had to factor into it. Because she didn’t want to, or couldn’t, charge him with assault or whatever it would be when you “grab [someone] by the forearms and [toss] them in the air”? As in, it’s reasonable that he wouldn’t do that if they hadn’t been dancing, so he was negligent in his dancing.

Just sounds odd, that’s all. I never thought of dancing as such a heavy responsibility.

I think the lawyer just used that term to get a little publicity. That is what ‘he says’ not what he put in the actual suit.

Throwing partners in the air is something that requires practice, not a few drinks.

From the article I read, the woman was at a mandatory after-hours employees party. They were dancing in a group, not as a couple, her boss just suddenly grabbed her arms and flipped her into the air, and she fractured her skull on the floor.

Hardly the same thing as dancing the jitterbug with a “dance partner” with whom you’ve been practicing. Looks like she’s got a decent civil case there. Employees were required to attend, her boss grabbed her without warning. It’s not like she went into a mosh pit where there is some kind of assumption of risk.

What made me laugh in the article I read was where she said: “I fell hard enough, you could hear the impact of me hitting the floor over the sound from the jukebox.”

All I could think was, “Well, sure. You could hear the impact over the jukebox.”

‘Negligent dancing’? Isn’t that called ‘assault’?

He flipped her into the air by grabbing her forearms? What were they dancing to, “Kung Fu Fighting”?