Joey said, in [post=11436687]620[/post] :
You have to keep justifying it because you miss the point of the accusation (at least as far as I’m concerned.
BS PI was asked for the justification, and answered it, a full seventy-five minutes before Joey chimed in and accused him of not justifying his vote so that he could wait until after he saw other people’s reactions before trotting out his reasons.
In other words Joey accused BS PI of doing something that he knew, or should have known, BS PI did not do. Taking a sound principle and using it as the basis for an attack in a case where it is not applicable is something that the Crimson Thorn would want to do, since it seems a solid ground on which to build a case, if one can only fudge over the fact that the accusation has already been shown to be groundless.
That was the basis for my Day 1 vote for Joey, and I have not seen it explained.
Cucuy’s vote created a tie between Joey and MentalGuy. If necessary, I will switch my vote to Joey to break ties, but not until a bit closer to the deadline.