Well, the Standard for Engagement Rings Just Went Up

Forget offering even the triple digit carats now.

To put that into perspective, it is nearly 400 miles larger in diameter than our Moon.

[Kenobi] That’s no Moon. That’s a diamond![/Kenobi]

Link to picture?

Here ya go!

Ok, I feel stupid. I never opened your first link. That’s one helluva diamond. New levels of bling. :eek:

I envy the corpse of the girl lucky enough to slip that on her finger.

If diamonds are a girl’s best friend, what does that make this?

From the article linked by the OP:

Here we see encapsulated the biggest fear of the diamond industry: that some day the emotionalism, monopoly, and artificial scarcity that keeps the price of diamonds so high will be broken, and you’ll be able to buy them for a fraction of their current price.

Judging from the photo, that’s a terrible cut…

The only diamond that wears you.

Must be Soviet.

Anything it wants to be.

This isn’t really news - the story is four years old.

Wouldn’t they be entirely worthless, if that massive space diamond was available?
How much diamond (in tonnes) is 10 billion trillion trillion carats exactly?

That’s a big-ass rock!

Don’t anyone show my wife this thread – our 10-year anniversary is coming up and I’m pretty sure I can’t afford to buy her something like that!

Meh.

As supply goes up, price comes down.

Try to interest your partner in other gemstones.

The weight in pounds was given as five million trillion trillion, so divide by 2000 for short tons (2.5 thousand trillion trillion) and take about eight-ninths of that for long tons or tonnes, which are about the same. So 2.25 thousand trillion trillion, more or less.

Mind you, there’s inevitably some wastage when it’s cut. :smiley:

Those numbers are too big for me to comprehend… how many elephants or double-decker buses is that? I need it in a standard tabloid format! :smiley:

More than enough for everyone in the world to give everyone else in the world an elephant-sized diamond… easily. :cool: