It has been brought to my attention that my case against Oredigger was, well, lacking, so here goes…
Oredigger falls into the catagory of high poster/low suspicion. But so do others, and there are plenty with less suspicion, so this reason is only part of it.
There is quite a lot of fluff and testeriser talk from Oredigger - talking about the testeriser is a good way for wolves to look like they are contributing, but really it is just pointless speculation at this point.
But then there is the strategy posts. For both Seeker and FS Oredigger argued against voting for these people - once their vote counts were so high that lynching was almost guaranteed. It certainly looks good, defending people who turn out to be innocent - but the wolves knew that they were innocent, and that trying to save them was likely a lost cause.
The case against EH is simple, but no less valid. Low vote count, fluff posts, no justification for votes and a highly defensive and aggressive attitude.
Telcontar used to top my suspicions list, but lately I have found his posts perfectly reasonable. Could be a wolf’s reaction to a near-lynch experience, but it could also be a townie’s reaction to NLE, or just a natural change in post style. Worth keeping an eye on, just like everybody else.