Bottom of the hour is even more confusing for people who don’t think in terms of a clock face very often.
I explained that badly. The phrase is commonly used obviously, but in respect to a specific object that is the topic of the conversion.
Like
“That new building is going to be 100 stories tall”
“Oh is it?”
or
“That desk is made of recycled toenails”
“Oh is it?”
are common. Using “it” to refer to the general state or situation described in a statement is a different, unfamiliar usage.
Not the one in California.
John Mace was referring to the one in Pennsylvania. That one gets an “h” at the end of it.
In the UK and other parts, “should” can be used as a conditional, which is pretty much restricted to obligation in the US. For example, to express an opinion, some people say: “I should think that…”
About “quite,” I think it sometimes implies a lesser degree than “very” when the two are used together.
One person: “What about (x)?”
Another: “It’s very good.”
One person: “What about (y)?”
Another: Well, it’s quite good, but…"
Otherwise, without the contrast, they’re interchangeable.
Years ago, I heard someone from the UK say “sideboards” instead of “sideburns.” Haven’t come across that since.
A friend from Ireland has a peculiar way of ending all of our phone conversations. When it becomes obvious that we’re drawing to a close, he’ll start to say things like, “Well, nice talking to you,” “I gotta run,” “Talk to you soon,” etc., but he’ll accelerate the speed and pitch of his delivery in an uninterrupted stream until he hangs up (“rings off” in UK). It was unsettling the first time I heard it, because it sounded like he was having to deal with something urgent and unexpected.
Someone upthread mentioned “have” (present perfect tense), and I agree that it’s an important UK/US difference when describing a recent event that affects the present.
“I can’t get in because I’ve lost my keys” (UK).
“I can’t get in because I lost my keys” (US).
I had a workmate in Bristol (who was very local, and frankly one of those people who was very proud of being English because he had nothing else whatever to be proud of, definitely not Indian) who used to do that. “I went to XX at the weekend.” “Oh, is it?”
Pretty sure it’s a local thing there as well, if not a very common one.
I finally figured out what quite means to me.
If you just say, for example, “it’s chilly today,” that could mean a wide range of temperatures – let’s call it from “0% chilly” to “100% chilly.”
If you say “it’s quite chilly today,” that restricts the range – at both ends. For me, this puts it around the 60% to 80% range. So, yes, it is an “intensifier,” in that you’re saying it will be chillier than your average chilly day – BUT you’re also saying it WON’T be horrendously chilly (and that’s why “quite” can sometimes be used to damn with faint praise.)
Oh, and sloe’s mini-review of Lexicon Valley is spot-on. I adore John McWhorter (as longtime Dopers know), but sometimes I miss the banter of those other guys.
I have a small satin/velour covered box that contains a tie tack, from a jewelery store in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. The spelling helps date the box to a period of time when the “h” wasn’t used (pre-1911).
Cite
As a young man, I was acutely aware of language differences because I was linguistically marked as an outsider. I also had to learn the separate rules on talking to young women because I had no experience with that. So it was interesting to observe that the young men and women I knew were “two countries separated by a common language”.
I don’t remember any of that now, except the discussion about the meaning of the word “Sheila”, a traditional Australian colloquialism described elsewhere as a word a women would “never use about herself”. Because to the blokes I knew, it was a value-neutral term: to the young women, it was a derogatory term.
There’s a lot of that kind of thing in most English-speaking societies. Maybe in other languages too, but I’m not qualified on that.
Something about young men valuing young women for something other than what young women value themselves for. 
So there’s a construction that I’ve encountered a couple times that rather intrigues me. I assume it’s Irish because both of the songwriters in question are Irish.
In American construction, the …you ever… implies a thing that is only theoretical - in the first example, the speaker would be asking if going to Czechoslovakia to marry his daughter is something that the listener would be morally opposed to or not, in general. In the second example, the speaker is implying that the listener NEVER comes home but, in theory if they did, x would happen.
However, in the context of the songs, it seems to be more immediate - in the first example, the speaker is in fact trying to make a deal with the listener to go marry his daughter ASAP, and in the second she seems to mean it more like “if you should happen to” come home without the implication that, on their own, the listener never would do so.
I just now heard this more recent episode. From 26:00 to 29:00, it gives a more succinct explanation of “yeah, no” that I think you’ll find equally worth a listen.
Not quite the same thing, but this reminds me of something I used to notice about Drew Carey, back in the days when he was hosting Whose Line Is it Anyway? In setting up the “Weird Newscasters” game, he would usually say, “Take it away whenever you hear the music.” Whereupon they would play a dramatic 6-o’clock news style musical sting to start the improv.
His use of “whenever” in that sentence always bugged me. There would only be one occurrence of the music, and then the game would start. So he should have said “when you hear the music.” To my ear, “whenever” implies that the music will be heard multiple times, and you have to do something each time it happens. That’s not what was going on at all.
Whenever = multiple events
When = single event
Right? Or is this another regional difference I’ve never noticed before?
Definitely a regional difference. We never used the word “whenever” that way when (or, as these people would say, whenever) I was growing up in the Philadelphia area. I first encountered it in college, from a person who was from Pittsburgh. I later heard a person from South Carolina use it that way as well. It’s interesting because it’s like the word “when” doesn’t exist for them; they only use “whenever.”
I think this is regional. I have a friend from Pittsburgh who always says “whenever” when I would say “when.”
Funny. I agree that “whenever you hear the music” implies to my ears that there are likely to be multiple instances of music. But if there were no music I would almost certainly say “whenever you’re ready” even though that phrase would be equally intelligible with “when”.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interesting that you both mention Pittsburgh. Drew Carey is famously from Cleveland, which is not far from the Pennsylvania border. It seems to be more widespread than just the Pittsburgh region.
On the other hand, I’m from Indiana, and it doesn’t seem to have reached us!
To me, whenever means either there will be multiple events or that there is no time limit. “Do this whenever you have the chance” is gentler to my ear than “do this when you have the chance.”
The word “scheme” can be a bit disconcerting. In British English it just means “a plan”. In US English “scheme” generally means “an unsavory plan”. When reading on the 'Net I have to stop sometimes and check the source to see which meaning to infer.
I like the name of the local brand of bottled water, “PGH[sub]2[/sub]O.” 