What are the most annoying things you see on the SDMB?

Oh god yes I hate “hi Opal!” posts. If you really need to show off that you are a childish lurker who wants to say an old inside joke to fit in, why not instead substitute it with “Fuck Zette”, who pointed out the phenomenon in this thread?

I also hate it when people say their rant is lame in the Pit. All of the rants are lame these days! Nobody has come out with anything humorous for a bazillion years. Still waiting for another one of LNO’s “I burn with the fire of…” posts, which were creative and funny.

We finally killed “all your base”. Thank Allah!

Every newb who looks at GD has to post “why G-D instead of God?” in GQ. Search the archives, troglodyte, and you will find your answer!

CAPS

Another one. People who have a joke in their sig line, but post it in every thread. Change the joke every week or be more frugal with it!

However, I have seen people use sig lines a lot less.

Another vote for the “Hi, Opal” thing. Really not at all funny or interesting anymore. In fact… I’m not sure it ever was.

But since “I agree” posts suck ass, I’ll add a few more:

Responding to a SDMB complaint thread in the pit with the exact thing someone is complaining about. You’re not fucking clever, you dumbasses. If someone posts “I hate when posters can’t spell!” and 45 people respond with “yeah mee two, thats reely stoopid,” it’s NOT FUCKING FUNNY. EVER. Stop being so god damn predictable, you sons of bitches. And of course, someone will respond to this post with something along those lines. Ha. Ha.

That is the main reason I never start pit threads about board behavior, because so many lame boring assholes will post the same unoriginal shit, and think they’re clever for it.

Not giving a link to the thread you’re complaining about. We don’t all read every thread that’s posted, so quit assuming everyone knows exactly what you’re talking about. If you say “wow, Ooner was such a cock in this thread. Ban him!” I want a fucking link so I can check out the situation without clogging up the server with a search, or clicking through every forum. Of course you have the thread open, or at least know where it is. Don’t be stupid and lazy. Link it, fucker.

Poster worship. I haven’t noticed quite as much of this lately, but posters with cheering sections bug the shit out of me. Jarbabyj kicks ass, and like I said, there’s not so much of this now, but it would always bug the fuck out of me to read posts from people just waiting for her next flame. Get over it.

Posters who act like talking to a troll will bring about the collapse of the SDMB. If people want to waste their time feeding the trolls, fucking let 'em. I think it’s kind of funny to see how much reasonable debate you can throw at a complete dumbass without any of it actually being taken into their puny little brains. DNFTT all the time is stupid, and is really just feeding the troll even more.

To kind of second a lot of the comments from above: If you’re seen a joke anywhere on the SDMB before, don’t use it. This goes for supposedly clever one-liners. This goes for references to previous threads. This goes for the “Since this is the pit…” joke mentioned above. There is more to SPOOFE than the toothbrush thing (I hope). If it’s been posted before, it’s done. Repeating jokes doesn’t make you funny or clever. It just makes you a dick.

I’m sure there’s a ton more, but I’m lazy. So, yeah.

I did one of these in MPSIMS.

I was totally joking with the bad grammar because I said: learn me something new.

guess it didn’t come out that way.

Much of the above, of course, but currently, the first on my “Boy it pisses me off” list is the drive-by political snipe.

Certainly politics are important. Certainly politics have a place on the SDMB. But not in every fucking thread

It’s fine to be passionate about politics. Passion is good. But not if it’s being used as a crutch. (“Jeepers, I don’t know what to say! I’ll do a drive-by political snipe! That’ll impress 'em!”

There are some posters who don’t seem to be able to make a post without babbling about politics.

[ul]
[li] Poster A: I don’t go out to the movies very often, but when I went to the movies last night, I was shocked to discover that the cost of the food was MUCH more than the cost of the ticket![/li]
[li] Poster B: Clinton is a lying pervert. This is Clinton’s fault![/li]
or

[li] Poster C: I need a recipe for ginger-snap cookies[/li][li] Poster D: Well if Duhbahyah hadn’t STOLEN the election, you’d already have one![/ul][/li]:rolleyes:

C’mon. Really. Keep the politics in the appropriate threads and try to get over yourselves. And I assure you, that this technique doesn’t convince anyone of anything OTHER than the idea that you’re an annoying jackass.

Fenris

I very much agree with the already mentioned “Hi Opal”, “me too” posting and especially lame attempts at humor when someone tries to be funny by doing exactly what someone is ranting about in a later post in that thread (Poster A: I hate it when people ask for cites, Poster B: Cite please!).

Finally the “spewing a soda all over my key board” lameness has slowed down a bit and the “pulling up a lawn chair” idiocy has been halted.

It annoys me when someone does an accidental double post and then immediately points it out and informs us all about what mundane mistake they made to make it happen or tells us that that they didn’t know why it happened. Who the fuck cares? It’s obvious that some sort of error happend. Big fucking deal, move on. You already accidently padded your post count so don’t add another one.

Haj

Haj

Things here that look stupid are:

When reading a thread post by post and every response says the same fucking thing.

When a nice debate is going and a few people decide to take it somewhere else entirely, turning the thing into a big semantic clusterfuck where everyone is trying to save face. It shows no class. And, it’s a HEADACHE to read that crap.

Cliche comments.

Ass kissers.

Bad logic.

The way the board software is configured.

I still don’t mind the place, though…

I also hate “Hi Opal”. It’s old, stupid, boring, and unoriginal.

And to add something new, I get tired of posts about Jack Chick. Yes, I know Chick is a narrow-minded dumbass. Always has been, always will be. Shut up about it.

I give you more!

[ul]
[li] The behavior in the very first reply to this thread warrants being shot. Repeatedly. In the face. With a cannon.[/li]
[li] Whenever someone proposes a hypothetical question(in IMHO or GD), there will be people who, rather than answering the question, will attempt to tear it to shreds. This is the equivelant of saying “What happened next?” at the punchline of a joke. The most recent example I can think of is the post “What would you do if you were in a room with a terrorist for an hour(something like that) and there were no repercussions?” and just a few posts later you get someone saying, “Well, it’s truly impossible for there to be no consequences,” and it degenerates into an argument of the merits of the question. I hate that.[/li]
[li] Relying on cites from a website with an extremely clear agenda. Especially painful in abortionist issues.[/li]
[li] General Question posts that could be solved within 20 seconds by searching the archives.[/li]
[li] Pointless comparisons to Adolf Hitler/Nazi Germany.[/li]
[li] Posting a spelling correction and :smack: as the sole content of a post. We can understand you meant to say “that” but accidentally wrote “hat.” It’s no big fucking mystery.[/li]
[li] Posting a spelling correction but for someone else’s post. Complete and utter arrogance and smugness.[/li]
[li] Generalizing American attitudes. (My god, you mean there are people in the U.S. who aren’t overweight capitalist nationalistic conservative gun-toting over-consumers?!?! :smack: )[/li]
[li] Generalizing any country’s political or social views. Ha, ha, shut up.[/li]
[li] (Excessive) “formatting” & punctuation !!![/li]
[li] Using a smily completely randomly and out of context. :cool: God, it just makes me so fucking mad! ;j[/li]
[li] Overusing smilies/pasting a random string of smilies at the end of a post.[/li]
[li] :smack: :smack: :smack: :smack: :smack: :smack: :smack:[/li][/ul]

  1. Unattributed quotes. Please add the name of the poster you are quoting.

  2. Plain URL links. Please use the available coding to descriptively name the link, or better yet, add a line or two describing the value of that link.
    Thank you for your cooperation.

Hey, Bad News Baboon…I wasn’t specifically talking about your thread. I see the “Learn me about…” threads almost every day. Yours, in context, made sense. I hope I didn’t make you feel singled out.

I’d like to re-emphasise one that both lenin and Fenris mentioned: posting a barbed comment or a statement not relevant to the thread just to express one’s hatred of something related to it.

Examples include the drive-by digs at conservatives and liberals (or Clinton, or Bush, or Britain, or Israel, or Palestinians, or whatever) in threads trying to discuss detailed issues without resorting to pointless digs.

My own personal (least) favourites are computer-related threads where specific advice on a problem leads to at least one “Well, if you had Linux instead of M$ Windows…” post. For crying out loud, it’s a valid debate but it’s not going to help the poster with their bloody question. If you can’t post something useful in response to a genuine question, don’t bother.

Similarly, MPSIMS, Cafe Society or IMHO threads where someone asks a question about their favourite band or show and some dimwit posts the obligatory “Doesn’t matter, 'cause it was a shit band/show anyway” message. If you hate rap music, don’t bloody post in a thread asking for good rap groups [hypothetical example].

If ya wanna talk old…

The "fuck december threads are getting pretty old. Yeah, he rubs a lot of people the wrong way. I get it. But, it’s been done to death and pile-on parties don’t accomplish a damn thing. You don’t have to read his threads, you know.

  1. Thread titles which tell you nothing whatsoever about the thread. Every once in a while there’s a ‘Please make thread titles descriptive’ campaign, but some posters persist in ignoring this simple policy.

  2. Misleading thread titles, designed as a sort of feeble lure to get you to open a thread which you otherwise might not. And this achieves what, exactly?

  3. Anyone can make a typo, but some of the utterly incurable and persistent errors try my patience after a while. ‘There’ and ‘their’ / ‘where’ and ‘were’… is it really that hard to learn the difference?

  4. Crass sexism aimed at men, the last known target group not ring-fenced by political correctness. Yeah, we’re all dogs, we’re all after it all the time, we’ll get it anywhere we can, we only talk to women we want to sleep with, our one and only motivation is sex, we lack finer feelings of empathy and compassion, we’re slobs, it’s heavy metal and sports all the way yawn yawn yawn. Heaven forbid that among the gazillion males on the planet there should be any who don’t fit the stereotype.

  5. The way any GD thread touching on issues of faith, religion or theology tends to degenerate into a mud-slinging insult bath. It’s a shame - faith and theology can be really fascinating subjects, and the opportunity to listen to points of view from all over the world is priceless.

  6. In CS, the intrusion of unduly aggressive extremism into what could actually be an interesting exchange of views. The “Such-and-such absolutely sucks big-time and anyone who says different is a retard” type of rant is not as rare as it should be.

when some one says something like:

and the drive by cheap shots.

and the “Hi Opals”

and the references to ‘cliques’ etc.

but the puns - well they **have ** to stay!

I get irritated when someone comes into a crush thread and whines about how thye never get mentioned in crush threads. I especially get irritated when it’s someone that registered a month ago and has 32 posts. I mean, 90% of the board never gets recognized in those threads. I don’t know what it is, but this is the sort of self-pity that makes me want to smack the person involved.

Pretentious threads that tell me what I should find annoying.

Attention: This is called irony, as it relates the following point from the OP:

On the other hand, I’m absolutely serious.

Who has told you what to hate, Batty? We’re just venting here.

[ul]
[li] When an argument spirals down to what the OP meant.[/li]
[li] When people use dictionary.com as an argument.[/li]
[li] Moo![/li][/ul]

Oh, and I hate arguments of semantics too.