Let’s try it out with the famous Love verses in 1 Corinthians:
You are right Joe_Cool, that just sounds so horrible. How could Lib make such outrageous claims! :rolleyes:
Let’s try it out with the famous Love verses in 1 Corinthians:
You are right Joe_Cool, that just sounds so horrible. How could Lib make such outrageous claims! :rolleyes:
The OP asks what do Christians think of other religions. Lib, and Poly have spoken to the greater implied question, “What does Christ think of other religions?”
I will join them.
The Lord loves His children. Their religions are not the object of His love, even those among them who are Christians. It is their souls that He loves, and seeks to save beyond the end that comes to all on the Earth.
I will have to place myself among those who feel that Christians know who they are, and some who speak of themselves as Christians know in their hearts that they are not. But, you and I don’t know one from another. I know that I am a Christian. Christ knows who is a Christian. I don’t know if Polycarp is a Christian. I know he speaks here with a patient, loving heart, in support of the Love of Christ for all man. That seems to me to be something a Christian should do. But I could be fooled, and end up buying Poly’s tracts, and books, and pledging to his Foundation, as he sits at home, laughing and counting his filthy lucre.
Libertarian speaks out relentlessly that God is Love, and the path to love will, and must lead to God. Sounds true to me. Sounds tautological, in fact. But then, tautology is a common thing, when we try to put faith into words.
WV Woman speaks out often here, of the biblical precedent for her faith. I do not contend with her, on the matter of her faith. I do, when she applies that to others. She can find truth, and love, and God Himself in the Bible, if she seeks Him there. Many do. But those who seek self aggrandizement can find it as well. The mind is a dangerous place to place one’s faith. Words serve all who use them, for good or ill, whatever the source of the words might be.
You see, I know many people who have no clue about religion. They just aren’t smart enough to have a theology of any sort. A dear sweet friend always tells me, as he recalls his father, passed away many years ago, that “My father, art in Heaven, with Jesus, and Superman.” What religion is he? Religion won’t keep you out of Heaven. I don’t know if it will help you, though.
I don’t go to church all that often. I won’t discuss my charity in public. Anyone who wishes may form an opinion on whether I am a “True Christian.” Only two opinions on that subject matter at all: my Lord’s, and mine.
I believe in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and Savior of Man. I believe that He shall judge the souls of men. Each one. And I believe that he will see the soul, entire, in every aspect, and with His infinite love. Every soul that will be saved, shall be saved. Sinners, pagans, priests, and fools, every one beloved of the Lord, the infinite spirit of Love. I doubt that religion will come up, in most cases, but that’s just my opinion. I am sure that my opinion won’t come up at all.
“Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength; loving someone deeply gives you courage.” ~ Lao-Tzu ~
Yeah, especially since they’re false.
God does not insist on his own way? I beg to differ:
God bears all things?
God is not jealous?
Love is God’s nature, but so are Justice, Mercy, and Holiness. There is much more to him than just a big group hug.
The problem with considering the Bible to be the infallible word of God is that it can run the risk of worshiping the Bible, and not the God that is supposedly behind it.
God is much bigger than some book.
The problem with not accepting anything as the word of God is that without any objective reference, everything becomes subjective. And it runs the risk of worshipping self and experience, since that is then all you have to rely on.
Amen, Guin.
Jesus is the Word of God.
So Joe_Cool, if God is not love, then 1 John is wrong, then the Bible is not infallable and you have a problem. Of course, the way you describe God, he is an intollerable, unmovable, uncaring entity that is only interested in putting his will on the world instead of having people come to him freely. This is the being you want everyone to have an intimate relationship with? I’d get better treatment in prison than by the God you describe.
So is God Love or isn’t He? Is He infintely merciful as the Bible claims or is he bent on punishing all who don’t believe in words written on papyrus? Does He require us to love all or is he so jealous that we must love only him? If he is the same yesterday and tomorrow, how can you attribute these changes in his nature?
“His ways are not our ways”. But to explain God to people, you must attribute our ways to His. I believe that God is bigger than anyway we can describe him in words that can be misused and misunderstood.
Here I though Jesus taught all about looking beyond the words and look to the meaning. He taught to look beyond the wedding vows spoken to the love that sparked those very vows. He spoke out about people following the letter of the law instead of understanding the spirit and meaning of the law giver. And here we are, 2000 years later, and people are still using his words to oppress instead of using his love to embrace. How sad.
Sad indeed, my brother. Sad indeed. Saddest most of all for the man Who said, “Take my yoke upon you, for I am gentle in spirit, and you will find rest for your soul.”
True, but there’s quite a lot of that dogma imbedded in christianity. Pope II and his comments regarding various other religions etc. A lot of it is pure religious/cultural supremacy rhetoric at its root.
No doubt, but if you look at it in terms of the big picture these religious wars have always been occurring.
I was referring to the Far east, I thought the whole confucianism comparison of morals would tip the reader off on that. Next time i’ll clarify…
More waxing poetic, but still no answer, I see. What a surprise. I don’t know why you think you get to pick and choose the elements of God’s nature to the exclusion of the ones you don’t like.
Or why you refuse to respond to such a simple, straightforward question.
Pssst… Joe_Cool. Lib already answered your question on Page One when DJ brought it up. Just so you don’t have to look, here it is:
Do try to keep up.
Joe,
Do you really need someone to go to Hell for some reason?
Does it cheapen your salvation if the love of God is greater than you imagine it to be?
Look for the source of this need. It might be your own.
Tris
Joe, does it not say that whatever you do to the least of our brothers, that you do unto Him?
Does that not mean, that God is a part of everyone-whether or not we think that is so?
Tris, where in this entire thread did I say anything relating to hell or anybody going there? No place that I am aware of. I don’t believe I even alluded to the possibility. In fact, I have no desire whatsoever for anyone to go to hell. However, the OP asks what Christians believe about other religions. As a Christian, I feel well qualified to answer that - I believe they are false.
Additionally, I am absolutely certain that God’s love is far, far greater than any of us is even capable of imagining. However, I do have a problem with an image of Him that is contrary to what He has revealed to us.
I have a further problem with “creative interpretation” of plain text that has plain meaning. If I made a statement as plain as that, and people who know me told others that I meant something other than what I said, I would not be pleased. Jesus made, in no uncertain terms, claims of exclusivity in salvation.
Thunderbug, What you quoted does not answer my question, which, since I guess it’s not as clear as I had thought, is: What indication is there in the text that when Jesus said ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life, no man comes to the father but by me,’ he in fact meant anything other than Himself?
What indication is there that he even said that? Other than John?
Curiously, does anyone really know how many times the term “Christian” is used in the Bible? As far as what christians think of other religions, what do christians think of other “christians”? I’ve already read from several different responsed from people who consider themselves christian, yet there are well over 1000 different christian denominations. I know of many Christian denominational churches that practice things that are made up from men, not God. And many who leave critical stuff out.
Just because you attend a church that considers themselves a christian denomination, you really need to compare it the the bible to determine you are following God the way God intended.
But when you choose what book to consider to be the word of God, or when you read the Bible and try to figure out what it’s saying, what do you rely on?
Self and experience?
Personally, my objective reference is reality.
Here’s a link to my FAQ:
Creative interpretation?! Most of Christian theology is based on creative interpretation! Jesus as Messiah, the Devil opposing God only to be cast out of Heaven and the Trinity are all examples of “creative interpretation”. What makes your “interpretation” any more correct than that of Libertarian or Polycarp’s? Why do you think Jesus, who spoke constantly in riddles with deeper hidden meanings, could not have been doing so here. Why do many Christians take the parable of Lazarus and build an everlasting torturous hell from it instead of seeing it as it is, a parable, yet when Jesus says something as metaphoric as “I am the way, the truth and the light, no one comes to the father but by me” claim the message is perfectly clear? Was Jesus literally a walking yellow brick road (the way), or a philosophical statement (the truth) or a halogen lamp (the light)? It’s a metaphor open to interpretation. You interpret it as some exclusive club with set rules. Seems to me Poly and Lib interpret it in the context of Jesus’ overall message.
My favorite accounts of Jesus are by Kahlil Gibran, in Jesus the Son of Man, available in its entirety online.
I count 3. Two in Acts, one talking about the growth of the new religion in Antioch:
and one in a passage where Paul describes his beliefs to King Herod Agrippa:
and one in the first letter from Peter: