That is as I remember it.
You’re welcome, and it brings back nice memories for me too.
Kitty. Her name was Kitty. I remembered as I was typing this. My first love, as mentioned in the OP, that is.
First time I heard it was my Aunt saying it in about 1955, Danville VA. If she had said “I swear…” her mom would have whacked her one. I’ve also heard my Southern relatives say “Well, I swigger.”
Just got off the phone with my 87 yr. old mom. Danville, VA. She said she would have been “switched” if she said anything other than “I declare.” Whether you said “swan” “swigger” or anything as a euphemism, you were in trouble. Religion in the South was serious business.
Yeah… yourdictionary.com is not my New England dictionary, haha! Never, ever, ever heard this and I have oldschool swamp Yankee family. I may start using it though.
We long ago learned how to distinguish between an individual man or woman. Only those bereft of eyesight or insight need to be vague about the sex of someone about whom they’re speaking. Sorry you are bereft of eyesight or insight; I am capable of telling a he from a she. Therefore, I have no need to use a plural pronoun to mask my ignorance, let alone to advertise ignorance by using a plural pronoun where a singular one is required.
The “I shall warrant ye” explanation sounds very strained to me. I don’t buy it at all.
I think it is simply a case of people not wanting to say “I swear” for religious reasons. (The applicable verse being Matthew 5:33-38.) There are still people who will not swear an oath in court because of these verses in the Bible, which is why the required oath before giving testimony is often rendered “Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth…”
And so…
“Well I swear!” became “Well I swan!” (“Well I Suwanee” being a humorous variant) in the same way that:
“God damn” became “gosh darn”
“fuck” became “fudge”
“shit!” became “shoot!”
…in my opinion, based on growing up around people who held those religious beliefs and tended to use those swear word substitutes.
Wow. You resurrect a dead thread to argue against the singular they which even the most strident prescriptivist grammarians are giving up the fight against since there’s just so much damned evidence that it is indeed the common usage for centuries, and therefore, correct usage.
Because, sometimes, you just don’t know the gender of the person you’re speaking of and you want to reference them without using the awkward ‘him or her.’ Now, since you have sight and insight, what was the gender of this supposed person I just referrenced?
I use ‘swannin’ round’ as a term of mild opprobrium, but it was picked up from my Brit shipmates when I worked off-shore in “the oil patch”. Don’t think it is heard here in the Colonies too often.
A tip of the hat to Mr. Tobin, who taught high school English in 1973. He called to the departing class, one day, saying, “Somebody left his purse at his desk.” Just as an illustration of the drawbacks of the default pseudogeneric pronoun.