there’s no product to show or do something with, so they have to rely on imagery
the imagery of perfume is sex, sex, sex, so lots of shots of women in various states of undress and flirtatious, passion-filled looks and heavy eyelids
originally, surreal imagery had to be used to suggest sex without being to racy. As standards became more lenient, advertisers could get away with more direct imagery, but the weird stuff still remains
focus groups showed women liked the dream of “breaking free”, so the ads often show the woman running away from a man or busting through walls
it’s a crowded market, and people expect fragrance ads to be weird, so the way to get noticed is to be even weirder and more nonsensical than the other ads
Side note: the Natalie Portman ad is certainly stupid, but what behavior do you find unstable and psychotic?
I guess the yelling, throwing things, and jumping off the pier fully-clothed are a turn-off for me. A woman portrayed like that is probably high-maintenance as well (I am not saying Natalie is).
The ad isn’t trying to sell that you can “obtain” Natalie Portman (like an Axe ad would), but that you can “be” Natalie Portman and live the crazy celebrity lifestyle.
One second, she’s laughing and in love. The next second, she’s screaming on a bus. Then, she’s rolling in the sheets. Then, she’s jumping off a pier.
The quick jumping back and forth between happy, sexy, crazy, angry, etc. is what seems unstable. If they showed a progression of a relationship, it wouldn’t seem so unstable. But this jumping back and forth is what seems unstable.
I get that it’s a commercial and it’s compressed for time and they’re just trying to evoke an emotion… but why do they feel the need to evoke every emotion?