What is Guadere's Law?

I’ve see a hand full of references to Guadere’s Law since I started reading this board, and I’m wondering what that edict is.

I tried to do a search, but the search failed because “law” is less than the required 4 characters. (I put qoutes around “Guadere’s Law” but the search feature still wouldn’t process my request with the word “Law” in it.) If I search on “Guadere’s” alone, I get a buch of threads where users are mentioning Guadere’s posts, but do not explain/define the actual edict. :frowning:

Based on this quote

found in this thread, I’m assuming that it has to do with making a stupid mistake while pointing out or correcting another user’s stupid mistake. Is this assumption anywhere near correct? :confused:

Please help out the new fella. Guadere? Anybody?

Nouveau Bozo, the new clown in town

I am neither Gaudere nor Gaudere, but the answer to your question is in a principle coined by Gaudere, the Administrator here, back before she became a Moderator, that any rant focusing on improper spelling, grammar, or other misuse of the English language will itself contain an inadvertent error of the sort condemned by the poster. Like Murphy’s Law, it holds true an inordinate amount of the time.

I wasn’t sure if it was referring to Gaudere or if there was another person named Guadere.

So mblackwell’s post about Gaudere’s Law is a perfect example of Gaudere’s Law. :smiley:

Not to mention the superfluous ‘i’ in ‘apostrophes’.

Ah, thanks to the both of you!

So it looks as if I was nearly an exemplar of the edict in that I misspelled Gaudere’s name. However, I wasn’t actually bitching about anyone else’s spelling, so I’m off the hook. Plus, in my defense, I got the spelling from the referenced thread. So I am completely and udderly innocent. Not my fault! Don’t blame me! :wink:

And, as one of life’s sweet ironies, I just realized I misspelled “utterly” :eek: (what can I say, I just finished a glass of milk). But I decided that instead of correcting it, I would point out my error, ala this thread.

And just to doubly prove the point, in attempting to gently tweak you about having misspelled Gaudere as Guadere (which as I now see was accurately copying mblackwell’s misspelling), I of course misspelled the misspelling by spelling it accurately both times! Gaudere rules even in reverse!!! :slight_smile:

Isn’t there some corollary to Gaudere’s law to the effect that attempts to correct spelling and grammatical errors will only compound the problem?

(I meant to say self-correct; when you post something because yopu spot one of your own mistakes, you are even more likely to make another in the post when you try to correct it).

“yopu”?

It just gets better and better… :slight_smile:

I menat to say ‘you’

Are you doing this on purpose now? :smiley:

Maybe I was doing it on purpose all allong

Personally, whenever I’m pointing out an error in spelling or grammar, I make it a point to deliberately include one known error, just to stay on the safe side. At least that way, I know where it is.

(and before anyone starts looking, this post is not pointing out an error.)

The Turks are said to intentionally misplace one thread in their hand-woven carpets, out of pious humility, because “Only Allah is perfect.”

Why does Gaudere get credit for the law? I recognized it on Usenet years before the SDMB existed. And I doubt I was the first to suggest the law.

Chronos, yuo forgot to capitalize “and” inside the parentheses.

Perhaps “Only Allah is perfect”, but Nouveau Bozo mispelled “ala” which, from the French, is two words “a là”.

I on the other hand misspelled misspelled, an udderly ridikulus missteak.

That’s à la, not a là.

But à la is merciful and compassionate, unlike the Grammar Police, Arnold.

My misspellings were intentional. It was supposed to be a joke.

[sub]I wonder if anyone bought that ;)[/sub]